by Rik E Boy » Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:08 am
by whufc » Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:11 am
by whufc » Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:39 am
by locky801 » Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:57 am
by Rik E Boy » Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:34 am
whufc wrote:Unpopular opinion.
I like Mitch Marsh, he gets it, he knows how lucky he is, he gets that Australia bag the crap out of him, he knows he hasn't made the opportunities count.
What's he meant to do, say sorry selectors you've picked me but tbh I don't want to give it another crack.
I don't think he will ever make it at test level but if he did I would be extremely happy for the bloke. It takes a lot to stay committed and keep coming back.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:01 am
Rik E Boy wrote:
I don't like the continual selection of Marsh but I want every guy who wears the Baggy Green to succeed so I'm glad he took four wickets last night. We really need him to step up and become the cricketer that Cricket Australia thinks he can be. Look how much difference Stokes has made for England. Arguably, we'd be four up if they didn't have him.
regards,
REB
by whufc » Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:13 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:
I don't like the continual selection of Marsh but I want every guy who wears the Baggy Green to succeed so I'm glad he took four wickets last night. We really need him to step up and become the cricketer that Cricket Australia thinks he can be. Look how much difference Stokes has made for England. Arguably, we'd be four up if they didn't have him.
regards,
REB
I have to agree, we all know what he is capable of but it's just not often enough.
I don't know why they dropped Starc for Siddle, having the extra pace bowler (Marsh) would have benefited more with a left armer, if you're facing Hazelwood and Cummins for a while and then along comes Siddle, I don't think you'll struggle too much.
I was calling for Lyon to be dropped too pre-game, 4 overs suggest he should've been.
Warner
Harris
Labersomething
Smith
Head
Wade
M.Marsh
Paine
Cummins
Starc
Hazlewood
by FlyingHigh » Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:57 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:44 pm
by amber_fluid » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:06 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
by Booney » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:48 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
by The Bedge » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:50 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by heater31 » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:52 pm
They did take 8 wickets and most probably a review or 2.....FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
by gadj1976 » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:58 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
by amber_fluid » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:01 pm
gadj1976 wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
^ This, sh1ts me to the back teeth!
Cricket in general is struggling to keep people interested and then they go and do this. They should be made to either 1, keep playing till they bowl 90 or come back the next day, early and start bowling the extra 7 overs they missed the day before.
by FlyingHigh » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:13 pm
heater31 wrote:They did take 8 wickets and most probably a review or 2.....FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
by Armchair expert » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:13 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:15 pm
heater31 wrote:They did take 8 wickets and most probably a review or 2.....FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
by Booney » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:17 pm
gadj1976 wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Australia's over rate was a disgrace.
82 over in 6.5 hours, no weather interruptions, not extreme heat, no significant injury interruptions and not being belted all over the park.
All countires do it, ICC are gutless
^ This, sh1ts me to the back teeth!
Cricket in general is struggling to keep people interested and then they go and do this. They should be made to either 1, keep playing till they bowl 90 or come back the next day, early and start bowling the extra 7 overs they missed the day before.
by locky801 » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:25 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Why did Lyon only bowl 4 overs?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |