Round nintelevewelve

[Jim05]

That was always my understanding to

They showed the actual AFL rule on the Sunday Footy show and the umpire was spot on, its taken from in play closest to where it lands out of play.

How did they explain it Wedgie? Rule as quoted in post above seems pretty clear.

They quoted the law (printed it on the screen), I assume the AFL is different or the above rule is outdated.

Apparently the laws got rewritten in 2019 to take a few grey areas out

[Armchair expert]

I do not watch the footy shows, did they explain why Newnes took the kick and not Gibbons, or was that a **** up?

[Wedgie]

I do not watch the footy shows, did they explain why Newnes took the kick and not Gibbons, or was that a **** up?

As per my previous post that appeared to be a **** up, most people agreed they didn't think Gibbons wouldn't have got close too, he was miles closer to the ball than Newnes was.

[LMA]

Another example of how confusing our rules are, if you push someone in the back just after they have disposed of it, it's called back to the spot. But if you bump someone over front or side on after they dispose of it, it goes down field.

[Dutchy]

Brayshaw stuffed up, but the focus is on the umpires?

[Wedgie]

Hawthorn don't even look like scoring atm.

[Wedgie]

Must be a breeze, one goal one so far in the 2nd quarter!

[Booney]

Apparently the laws got rewritten in 2019 to take a few grey areas out

You mean they get rewritten every week to include more grey areas, yes?

[Booney]

The Bulldogs using Dunkley and Macrae against Adelaide in the ruck the ultimate troll. They were using it as a practice match.

[Dutchy]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

[Bum Crack]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

Yes. Most definitely

[Booney]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

Adelaide don't have to try and get rid of Polec and has contract this summer.

[mighty_tiger_79]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

Well thats a Bruce McAveney style question, sitting 18th, the Crows have the most upside of any side.....[emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

[Jim05]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

Adelaide don't have to try and get rid of Polec and has contract this summer.

Next years crop of SA kids look pretty darn good so a couple of lean years for the Crows could work out ok

[Dutchy]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

Adelaide don't have to try and get rid of Polec and has contract this summer.

Nah just Gibbs..

[Booney]

Does Bum Crack still think Adelaide have more upside than North?

Adelaide don't have to try and get rid of Polec and has contract this summer.

Nah just Gibbs..

Gibbs has one year to run on probably $600k and Polec has 3 to run on probably $800k.

Gibbs is an easier sell every day of the week, even at 32 years old.

[Dutchy]

Polec was heavily front ended.

[Booney]

Polec was heavily front ended.

Like I said, $800k.

[Dutchy]

Im guessing Shaw wants Polec to test the trade waters, if he gets interest he leaves, if he doesn't he either buys into the Shaw rebuild or sulks in the ressies for 3 years. There is only one party that loses in this scenario.

[Bum Crack]

Im guessing Shaw wants Polec to test the trade waters, if he gets interest he leaves, if he doesn't he either buys into the Shaw rebuild or sulks in the ressies for 3 years. There is only one party that loses in this scenario.

Yep North