by Armchair expert » Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:58 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:05 pm
Armchair expert wrote:I only go to the supermarket and the all male brothel and I am still get to sign in anywhere
#winning
#badluckbigbrother
by mots02 » Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:16 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Armchair expert wrote:I only go to the supermarket and the all male brothel and I am still get to sign in anywhere
#winning
#badluckbigbrother
The supermarket is a bit suss but you'd think your work would already know you're there.
by stan » Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:33 pm
by Armchair expert » Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:35 pm
mots02 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Armchair expert wrote:I only go to the supermarket and the all male brothel and I am still get to sign in anywhere
#winning
#badluckbigbrother
The supermarket is a bit suss but you'd think your work would already know you're there.
Is it really your work if its your hobby too?
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:04 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:How do you prove to the joint you have signed in?
I was asked no less than 5 times to sign in even though I already had at the door?
I signed in twice(scanned the code) but told the 3rd person who asked to politely PO.
I don’t have the app I just scan the QR code that brings up the info already(I had to enter it manually the first time).
Had do you prove to them you have signed in?
When you open the app / scanner you can "Open last check in" and it shows your last venue check in.
Yeah right.
Cheers.
An old couple walked in behind me to the pub and the old dear said to me, ‘how do we do this’?
Her husband pulled out a nokia phone(not sure if the model was a Nokia but it was old) and pretended to take a photo of the door and said **** it that’ll do, and proceeded to walk in behind me.
It’s clearly working!
by whufc » Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:07 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:41 pm
Q. wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Q. wrote:daysofourlives wrote:ABSOLUTE BOMBSHELL : Just published study finds Invermectin more effective than any of the experimental vaccines in preventing Covid infections.
https://medicalpressopenaccess.com/.../ ... 9_1007.pdf
This is huge.
Months ago Australian Professor Tom Borody told the world that Ivermectin was super effective against Covid. Then our health bureaucrats went after him and silenced him.
This study looked at ‘IVERCAR’ which was a combination of Carageenan and
ivermectin
Carrageenans are naturally occurring extracts from the Rhodophyceas seaweed. They are commonly used as thickening agents in the food industry with FDA approval for this indication.
Now look at the results of this study;
‘’A total of 1,195 health care workers were recruited from 4 major hospitals in Argentina ..... 788 participants received IVERCAR and PPEs, while the remaining 407 simply adhered to standard PPEs.
RESULTS :
‘’The overall infection rate in health care workers recruited for this study was 20% with 237 testing positive for CoVid 19 during the 3 month study recruitment.
‘’Of those infected, all patients were from the comparator group of using PPE alone. This represented an overall infection rate of 58.2% ( 237 of 407) in the PPE group.
‘’No patients of the 788 treated with IVERCAR tested positive for CoVid 19 during the study.’’
That’s not a misprint - out of the 407 hospital workers that used PPE only - 58.2% became infected with Covid.
And in comparison, of the 788 hospital workers that took Ivermectin - there was not a single Covid infection - 0%, zero, none, zip. Incredible. Not even the experimental mRNA vaccines are reporting such results.
How many lives and how much economic destruction could have been avoided, if only our Health Bureaucrats looked at the evidence and listened to Professor Borody, instead of shutting down free speech and open debate and hounding him into silence.
The Australian studies were retracted and the Argentinian study is yet to be published or peer reviewed.
Looks like its been published to me
In which peer-reviewed medical journal?
by Groover » Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:36 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Q. wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Q. wrote:[quote="daysofourlives"]ABSOLUTE BOMBSHELL : Just published study finds Invermectin more effective than any of the experimental vaccines in preventing Covid infections.
https://medicalpressopenaccess.com/.../ ... 9_1007.pdf
This is huge.
Months ago Australian Professor Tom Borody told the world that Ivermectin was super effective against Covid. Then our health bureaucrats went after him and silenced him.
This study looked at ‘IVERCAR’ which was a combination of Carageenan and
ivermectin
Carrageenans are naturally occurring extracts from the Rhodophyceas seaweed. They are commonly used as thickening agents in the food industry with FDA approval for this indication.
Now look at the results of this study;
‘’A total of 1,195 health care workers were recruited from 4 major hospitals in Argentina ..... 788 participants received IVERCAR and PPEs, while the remaining 407 simply adhered to standard PPEs.
RESULTS :
‘’The overall infection rate in health care workers recruited for this study was 20% with 237 testing positive for CoVid 19 during the 3 month study recruitment.
‘’Of those infected, all patients were from the comparator group of using PPE alone. This represented an overall infection rate of 58.2% ( 237 of 407) in the PPE group.
‘’No patients of the 788 treated with IVERCAR tested positive for CoVid 19 during the study.’’
That’s not a misprint - out of the 407 hospital workers that used PPE only - 58.2% became infected with Covid.
And in comparison, of the 788 hospital workers that took Ivermectin - there was not a single Covid infection - 0%, zero, none, zip. Incredible. Not even the experimental mRNA vaccines are reporting such results.
How many lives and how much economic destruction could have been avoided, if only our Health Bureaucrats looked at the evidence and listened to Professor Borody, instead of shutting down free speech and open debate and hounding him into silence.
The Australian studies were retracted and the Argentinian study is yet to be published or peer reviewed.
Looks like its been published to me
In which peer-reviewed medical journal?
by Q. » Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:24 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Q. wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Q. wrote:The Australian studies were retracted and the Argentinian study is yet to be published or peer reviewed.
Looks like its been published to me
In which peer-reviewed medical journal?
Im glad you bought up the peer-reviewed medical journal.
I was wondering where i can find this for Pfizers approved covid vaccine in the UK?
Are you happy to be a guinea pig when they roll it out here?
by stan » Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:30 am
by Booney » Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:49 am
by Booney » Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:50 am
by Trader » Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:50 am
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:56 am
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:57 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Dysfunctional SA Health just doing what SA Health does
https://indaily.com.au/news/2020/12/07/ ... EAD%20MORE
Wade needs to replace the top.
Maybe they should have given the top job to Nick Reade (although he probably would have declined it!)
by locky801 » Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:38 pm
Booney wrote:From Monday December 14th -
Stand up drinking
Gatherings at home 50 people
by amber_fluid » Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:34 pm
by Booney » Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:35 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Have they mentioned easing of office restrictions?
by amber_fluid » Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:35 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Have they mentioned easing of office restrictions?
Yep, get back to work.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |