mal wrote:Im not LOOKing forward to the opening up the borders Thanks to Marshall Law we are living in extremely safe confines , a lifestyle envied around the world But its inevitable that : The borders will open The incidence of Covid will rear its ugly nature in South Australia
Almost realistically , I should prepare my placard , and do at least a one man demonstration "" Dont open the borders YET""
98% of fully vaxed people with see little to no symptoms when they contract COVID, good enough for me, open them up!
daysofourlives wrote:so all you supporting vaccine passports, whats your opinion when they link your bank accounts to this and if you havent had your 800th booster shot your accounts are frozen until you do? Thats where this is heading, but at least you'll be free to travel
wow
Bookmark it, you said the same thing last year when i suggested we were heading for vaccine passports.
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019 Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
daysofourlives wrote:so all you supporting vaccine passports, whats your opinion when they link your bank accounts to this and if you havent had your 800th booster shot your accounts are frozen until you do? Thats where this is heading, but at least you'll be free to travel
Will they put money in my account coz I got **** all for them to take.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Jim05 wrote:Dan just went bang! Has dropped mandatory vaccination on nearly every worker
Surely this is the final straw, massive protests to come which is what Dan wants. He and Victoria police wants protests, they want to inject their agitators and actors in amongst them like he did last week. My prediction is one of the placed stooges will shoot at Victoria police, might even "kill" a police officer, what better way to get the police back in the good books with the bleeding hearts that have started to question their stand by Dan ethos. This will be just the invite they need to shoot innocent protesters. Lets see what happens.
Does anyone know what religion you need to be part of to claim that you cant have vaccines? Or can you start your own religion relatively easily? I remember years ago some guy starting one where you had to wear a colander on your head, memory escapes me what that was about.
Wasn't it the flying spaghetti Monster?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
They've only locked down when the cases were community transmitted and opened as soon as under control. I'll back in the experts rather than end up like Vic and nsw
I'm sure he's just an antivaxer it couldn't possibly be happening, our hospitals here have no one in them lol
Great work DOOL have seen similar evidence from other countries where Doctors and Nurses have spoken up what happens in some cases but for some reason they are censored and deleted.
Everyone has been programmed to just accept the MSM narrative and not question it.
In this information war today the Truth are lies and the LIES are truth.
Todays conspiracy is tomorrows truth.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.
Ivermectin versus the recent molnupiravir both antiviral drugs made by Merck.
There are three possible explanations for health regulators’ refusal to allow the use of a highly promising, well-tolerated off-label medicine such as ivermectin:
As a generic, ivermectin is cheap and widely available, which means there would be a lot less money to be made by Big Pharma if it became the go-to early-stage treatment against covid.
Other pharmaceutical companies are developing their own novel treatments for Covid-19 which would have to compete directly with ivermectin. They include ivermectin’s original manufacturer, Merck, which has an antiviral compound, molnupiravir, in Phase 3 clinical trials for COVID-19. That might explain the company’s recent statement claiming that there is “no scientific basis whatsoever for a potential therapeutic effect of ivermectin against COVID-19.
If approved as a covid-19 treatment, ivermectin could even threaten the emergency use authorisation granted to covid-19 vaccines. One of the basic conditions for the emergency use authorisation granted to the vaccines currently being used against covid is that there are no alternative treatments available for the disease. As such, if ivermectin or some other promising medicine such as fluvoxamine were approved as an effective early treatment for Covid-19, the vaccines could be stripped of authorisation.
Once again follow da money.
Its a shame that the boffins in charge did not approve ivermectin thousands upon thousands of more lives could of been saved.
