Trial matches

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20257
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2496 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by DOC »

Adelaide beat Norwood by 28 points.
northerner
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:48 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Eastern Park
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by northerner »

Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.

5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.

Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.

This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
gazzamagoo

Re: Trial matches

Post by gazzamagoo »

northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.

5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.

Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.

This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.


I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
Posts: 20316
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 288 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by Big Phil »

gazzamagoo wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.

5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.

Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.

This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.


I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.


See above, Gazza.
gazzamagoo

Re: Trial matches

Post by gazzamagoo »

Big Phil wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.

5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.

Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.

This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.


I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.


See above, Gazza.


My back is bent, my eyes are weak..............
northerner
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:48 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Eastern Park
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by northerner »

Big Phil wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.

5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.

Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.

This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.


I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.


See above, Gazza.

And further to that he is definitely a big bodied (mid) recruit... in fact some have confused him with Buechner (BP!)
gazzamagoo

Re: Trial matches

Post by gazzamagoo »

northerner wrote:
Big Phil wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.

5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.

Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.

This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.


I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.


See above, Gazza.

And further to that he is definitely a big bodied (mid) recruit... in fact some have confused him with Buechner (BP!)

Now that the NT season is over, Jamie Jones is joining us from Nightcliff, another defender.
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Paralowie
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by Hazydog »

He was named in the ressies on Saturday - did he play?
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
TDJ44
Under 16s
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:03 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 52 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by TDJ44 »

Hazydog wrote:He was named in the ressies on Saturday - did he play?

Yes he did,wears a helmet.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20257
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2496 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by DOC »

No side was undefeated in the trial games.

I think there will be a lot of confusion/adjusting to the stand rule.
oldfella
Under 16s
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:47 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 14 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by oldfella »

On face value as a West Adelaide's support the performance against a team i have high respect for Glenelg (top 5 IMO) gives me hope for this season will not be as bad as last year for us long suffering Bloods supporters .

But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please
Spargo
Coach
Posts: 17680
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Sacred Heart OC
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has thanked: 6417 times
Been thanked: 5688 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by Spargo »

oldfella wrote:On face value as a West Adelaide's support the performance against a team i have high respect for Glenelg (top 5 IMO) gives me hope for this season will not be as bad as last year for us long suffering Bloods supporters .

But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please

I watched the trial vs North but not against West. We played a near full strength side both times.
It was also over 30 degrees at Richmond last week, different players were managed I’m told.
Trial game form is just that, forgotten already.
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

Time to get moving…
oldfella
Under 16s
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:47 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 14 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by oldfella »

Thank you
Fluffbag
Under 16s
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:24 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Modbury
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Trial matches

Post by Fluffbag »

oldfella wrote:On face value as a West Adelaide's support the performance against a team i have high respect for Glenelg (top 5 IMO) gives me hope for this season will not be as bad as last year for us long suffering Bloods supporters .

But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please



Long Suffering Bloods Supporters? At least you seen a premiership in your lifetime (assuming you are over 6 years old)

I never seen a GF win in colour!
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Trial matches

Post by RB »

Fluffbag wrote:I never seen a GF win in colour!


The 1964 grand final was actually played in colour, but yes no colour footage of it unfortunately.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 207 guests