cracka wrote:redyellow&blue wrote:whufc wrote:jo172 wrote:Might also add that for an offence apparently so serious to warrant an extraordinary fine/huge suspensions that 4 APPS points seems a bit trifling? One player a year?
Yep 100%.
Real misalignment between the financial fine and the players fine.
Personally if the breaches were 'so serious' then imo a fair result would be the club can still operate but they would have next to no points (which can be tracked through APPS) and that we would see them drop through down through the grades.
At the moment its hard to see how they would open the doors with such a fine.
No one learns that way. Why would it be fair? how many clubs would have lost or been relegated because GAZA were not playing fair by being over the cap and rorting the system?
I would hazard a guess that GAZA have
- been over the cap by big $$ for more then before 2018
- it's endemic at the club with multiple parties involved.
- It's cultural at some clubs to do this kind of thing.
Id' go as far to even suspend the players that got extra payments from playing in any comp anywhere for a year, and ban then from being allowed to sign contracts for 5 years. You want to play? play for free champ.
That's what would p!ss me off if I was an administrator of a club. The players seem to get off without punishment. Very happy to take the money
Exactly, I think it'll be a nice topic at the next Adelaide Footy league meeting....