AFL Round 13

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Jim05 »

North deserved the win and they probably won’t get another this year so should be on the cans tonight
User avatar
mots02
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4341
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Gold Coast Suns
Team: Reynella
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 1341 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by mots02 »

And Spargo won the bet with his Mrs…. Hope the prize is a good one!
Vamos
League - Top 5
Posts: 2970
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:55 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Vamos »

tigerpie wrote:Geez you'd think north had won the flag.
Rubbish free kick finished off the eagles. Absolute howler once again.
Good finish by Simpkin though.
A dubious free that cost West Coast the game, shame that :lol:
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by whufc »

The sooner the last touch rule comes into the AFL the better.

At the moment a defender can deliberately ‘fumble’ a ball over the boundary where everyone in the ground know what they were doing.

However if a player kicks it 45m takes two leg breaks, does a flipper and then trickles over the line it’s ’insufficient intent’

I know last touch wouldn’t change the result of those two decisions but at least the rule would be right and clear.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Spargo
Coach
Posts: 17680
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Sacred Heart OC
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has thanked: 6417 times
Been thanked: 5688 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Spargo »

whufc wrote:The sooner the last touch rule comes into the AFL the better.

At the moment a defender can deliberately ‘fumble’ a ball over the boundary where everyone in the ground know what they were doing.

However if a player kicks it 45m takes two leg breaks, does a flipper and then trickles over the line it’s ’insufficient intent’

I know last touch wouldn’t change the result of those two decisions but at least the rule would be right and clear.
Last touched is paid on a handball/kick - not a fumble.
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

Time to get moving…
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by whufc »

Spargo wrote:
whufc wrote:The sooner the last touch rule comes into the AFL the better.

At the moment a defender can deliberately ‘fumble’ a ball over the boundary where everyone in the ground know what they were doing.

However if a player kicks it 45m takes two leg breaks, does a flipper and then trickles over the line it’s ’insufficient intent’

I know last touch wouldn’t change the result of those two decisions but at least the rule would be right and clear.
Last touched is paid on a handball/kick - not a fumble.
I know.

What I’m saying is the current rule is ‘insufficient attempt to keep it in’ which isn’t really what they are paying at the moment. When kicks that take double legs breaks, land 20m in play and then spin out are given as ‘insufficient attempt’

It’s kind of a hybrid rule. Just make it last touch on kicks and handballs like the SANFL rather than this grey ‘insufficient attempt’ when there is heaps of times in a game blokes aren’t trying to keep it in.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Vamos
League - Top 5
Posts: 2970
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:55 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Vamos »

How come no team announcements have been made for Monday's game yet?
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by tigerpie »

Spargo wrote:
helicopterking wrote:That’s the worst Holding the Ball call this season.
Why can’t players go for the ball? Just call Incorrect disposal and obvious no attempts.
GWS, WC matches determined by Free Kicks and WB wrecked in the first half.
If they’d paid the blatant high tackle to Wardlaw first it wouldn’t have mattered, as it was Yeo did drag it in & to the letter of the law the HTB decision was 100% correct. The irony of a WC supporter whinging about umpiring in Perth is gold.
North the better team for most of the game, tackling & pressure was good.
Deserved win albeit the hard way.
The ball lobbed in his lap, yes he took possession he had no choice, then got tackled no prior I'll bounce it fellas should have been the call.
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62509
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

How's that not htb against King?
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Vamos
League - Top 5
Posts: 2970
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:55 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Vamos »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:How's that not htb against King?
Leniency for his Birthday on Monday
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by tigerpie »

How was that not holding the ball? Bloody hopeless.
User avatar
Bandit
Reserves
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:47 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Geelong
Location: Shed
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 111 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Bandit »

Gold Coast goal line efforts are heading into Ratuglea territory!
Another umpire decided game coming up? 3/3 today perhaps. *it will be a non htb decision.
Extend The Dukes
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20247
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2496 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by DOC »

On cue there it is.

A disgraceful free kick which goes with an overall sub par performance.

There is no professional league in the world with umpiring this bad.
User avatar
saintal
Coach
Posts: 5886
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:31 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: St Kilda
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has thanked: 379 times
Been thanked: 488 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by saintal »

Bandit wrote:Gold Coast goal line efforts are heading into Ratuglea territory!
Another umpire decided game coming up? 3/3 today perhaps. *it will be a non htb decision.
Good call.

Saints win a snooze fest 51-48. Football was the loser.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
Bandit
Reserves
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:47 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Geelong
Location: Shed
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 111 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Bandit »

Well I would say that's the worst of the lot... feel for the sun's there, especially Mac Andrew.
Extend The Dukes
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12447 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by The Dark Knight »

Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Jim05 »

Hard to feel sorry for the most looked after team in the comp
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12447 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by The Dark Knight »

.
Screenshot_20240608_212520_Instagram.jpg
Screenshot_20240608_212520_Instagram.jpg (109.73 KiB) Viewed 3256 times
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by tigerpie »

Go back to two umpires. This is bullshit.
There's no more thuggery in the game so no need for two extra field umpires.
I'm certain now that 4 blokes do not interpret the rule exactly the same.
Two exact same game scenarios tonight ( player takes possession and tackled) one holding the ball the other play on.
These decisions a minute apart, different spots on the ground so had to be different umpires.
And again umpires have a major bearing on the result.
User avatar
wristwatcher
Coach
Posts: 7132
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:50 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide Oval. The happiest place on earth
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 871 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by wristwatcher »

Pure dogshit.

Un-mic these clowns and pay some players who have played footy before to hold the whistle.

Another game decided by absolute Bullshit. Play on 100/100 times
The PNU Falcs 2005,06,13 x 2,14 and Div 1 Premiers in 2019......The SA 3peat - 2003,04,05
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 231 guests