No other "building" has clinical areas and the complexities that come with that.
Yeah but with in the last 15 years there’s been a new Glenside health facility and RAH built, significant redevelopments at FMC, NH, and LMH and current redevelopment occurring at FMC there’s are plenty of recent case studies on how to plan and budget for a new health facility build inclusive of treatment rooms , theatres and fire protection systems to meet IS0 4085 (I think is the health facilities emergency standard)
When you consider the current CEO for W&C health network was the executive lead for the Glenside redevelopment. They are well aware of the budgetary and infrastructure challenges when it comes to Billion dollar builds
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
No other "building" has clinical areas and the complexities that come with that.
Yeah but with in the last 15 years there’s been a new Glenside health facility and RAH built, significant redevelopments at FMC, NH, and LMH and current redevelopment occurring at FMC there’s are plenty of recent case studies on how to plan and budget for a new health facility build inclusive of treatment rooms , theatres and fire protection systems to meet IS0 4085 (I think is the health facilities emergency standard)
When you consider the current CEO for W&C health network was the executive lead for the Glenside redevelopment. They are well aware of the budgetary and infrastructure challenges when it comes to Billion dollar builds
Thank you, this is the point I was trying and failing to make
am Bays wrote: Yeah but with in the last 15 years there’s been a new Glenside health facility and RAH built, significant redevelopments at FMC, NH, and LMH and current redevelopment occurring at FMC there’s are plenty of recent case studies on how to plan and budget for a new health facility build inclusive of treatment rooms , theatres and fire protection systems to meet IS0 4085 (I think is the health facilities emergency standard)
When you consider the current CEO for W&C health network was the executive lead for the Glenside redevelopment. They are well aware of the budgetary and infrastructure challenges when it comes to Billion dollar builds
Thank you, this is the point I was trying and failing to make
All fair and reasonable but none of the QEH, FMC or LMH are on the scale of the NW&C, all are redevelopments or extensions ( been involved in all of them ) and many of them were budgeted and priced pre-COVID. The impact of COVID and the timing of the T2D connector has impacted on this ( as well as on going EBA's with the Unions ). Changing the design team well into the planning wasn't ideal, either. Not sure why they did that.
PS - the nRAH was announced in 2007, started in 2011 and opened in 2017 so it's only just inside your 15 year time line.
shoe boy wrote:No surprise both state and federal have zero credibility, zero leadership, aligning with Trump American style politics.
The weird thing is when I speak to some real lifetime hardcore Labor folk they are actually disgusted in the current Fed Labor especially and all brand Albo as a weak and spineless fool. Their belief is that with the Libs being out of the picture Labor should be returning their roots but instead have pretty much just become Liberal Lite now and as the Libs go further right so do Labor. One of them actually calls Mali the best Liberal leader this state has had
Tarzia announcing if they win the election if you breach your bail you are going to jail. Strike 1 and your inside.
Whereas i agree that should be the case in serious offences it is totally impossible for that to happen over the majority of offences people are charged with.
You would need to build 3 remand centres, mens, womens and young offenders, the cost would be enormous, remand centres and jails are already close to capacity
The Court system would get more clogged than it already is
Obviously vote chasing but the reality is that you would also have to change the law stipulating the fact that you must be imprisoned for a breach of bail.
Would surely have to stipulate the type of offences, imagine having been arrested for driving unlicensed or similar, bailed and caught again, you get arrested for breach of bail, due to the clogged court system you could be imprisoned for 6 to 12 months whilst waiting for your matter to hit the courts
No issues with Major Indictables (who probably shouldnt be bailed anyway) one strike and in you go but has to be alot of leeway with the rest
locky801 wrote:Tarzia announcing if they win the election if you breach your bail you are going to jail. Strike 1 and your inside.
Whereas i agree that should be the case in serious offences it is totally impossible for that to happen over the majority of offences people are charged with.
You would need to build 3 remand centres, mens, womens and young offenders, the cost would be enormous, remand centres and jails are already close to capacity
The Court system would get more clogged than it already is
Obviously vote chasing but the reality is that you would also have to change the law stipulating the fact that you must be imprisoned for a breach of bail.
Would surely have to stipulate the type of offences, imagine having been arrested for driving unlicensed or similar, bailed and caught again, you get arrested for breach of bail, due to the clogged court system you could be imprisoned for 6 to 12 months whilst waiting for your matter to hit the courts
No issues with Major Indictables (who probably shouldnt be bailed anyway) one strike and in you go but has to be alot of leeway with the rest
I must say that's of serious concern (or am I misreading this?) Not so much those who have not been convicted and are out on bail pending their time in Court. But, surely, if you've been tried, convicted, spent time inside and now bailed; conditional on being of good behaviour, any breach should put you back inside until it's heard?
