Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

bazza1 · Post by **bazza1** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:09 pm

once bitten twice shy REBs its all on cricket stats mate, i got a caning last time a revealed a bit about the club i love, if people want to have a go at my club, they have to do there research, nothing against you mate, just some of the other people that have there un-educated opinions.

swingman151 · Post by **swingman151** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:03 pm

When this Quirk character comes up against sides like Cavs & Kenilworth & he makes runs then he is playing lower than he should be Guys like Harris & Robertson (old as he is) will really show him how to bat not slog

Shake 'n Bake · Post by **Shake 'n Bake** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:37 pm

Any results from The Weekend?

bay boy · Post by **bay boy** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:38 pm

Shake 'n Bake wrote:Any results from The Weekend?

South Road 205
keswick 0/17

Red Ink · Post by **Red Ink** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:29 am

I'm still having trouble with people concerned how many runs Quirk is making, there are a few players in section 5, who could be playing higher, but I can't see any comments being made against them. For example Harris and Morris at Cavs should definitely be playing in higher grades of cricket. I know Cavs A grade is section 5, but does that change the fact that they could play at another club at a level that suits them. Correct me if i'm wrong but Morris played section 1 within the last couple of years and has gone to play section 5 averaging around 50.

Shake 'n Bake · Post by **Shake 'n Bake** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:51 pm

Any truth to the rumour that Krutli is now at Noarlunga didnt play yesterday but there was a Scott Krutli playing for Noarlunga that would have to be him if it were true?

The sarge · Post by **The sarge** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:32 pm

Its Sean Krutli. I have also heard that he has gone to noarlunga. If so that is a massive loss for south road and also for the association team

smithy · Post by **smithy** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:00 pm

he definitely played for the shoes against Porties on the weekend..
Wonder what made him leave south road?

bay boy · Post by **bay boy** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:27 pm

smithy wrote:he definitely played for the shoes against Porties on the weekend..
Wonder what made him leave south road?

he got a transfer for 3 games, so he could qualify for the SA country team

The Hound · Post by **The Hound** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:44 pm

bay boy wrote:
smithy wrote:he definitely played for the shoes against Porties on the weekend..
Wonder what made him leave south road?

he got a transfer for 3 games, so he could qualify for the SA country team

Hoping that the Scott Krutli named for Noarlunga is not Shaun from South Road playing under a different name. Captain of Noarlunga up to some old tricks???

Any rules about players transferring between sides and back to the original club.

bay boy · Post by **bay boy** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:10 pm

The Hound wrote:
bay boy wrote:
smithy wrote:he definitely played for the shoes against Porties on the weekend..
Wonder what made him leave south road?

he got a transfer for 3 games, so he could qualify for the SA country team

Hoping that the Scott Krutli named for Noarlunga is not Shaun from South Road playing under a different name. Captain of Noarlunga up to some old tricks???

Any rules about players transferring between sides and back to the original club.

ASCA are obviously ok with as there agreed for it to happen

Legend killer · Post by **Legend killer** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:42 pm

[quote="bay boy"][quote="The Hound"][quote="bay boy"][quote="smithy"]he definitely played for the shoes against Porties on the weekend..
Wonder what made him leave south road?[/quote]

he got a transfer for 3 games, so he could qualify for the SA country team[/quote]

Hoping that the Scott Krutli named for Noarlunga is not Shaun from South Road playing under a different name. Captain of Noarlunga up to some old tricks???

Any rules about players transferring between sides and back to the original club.[/quote]

ASCA are obviously ok with as there agreed for it to happen[/quote]

i heard the sca r goin to change their rules because of this so it doesnt happen again and i heard its a long shot but cause the sca rnt happy with it they will not get picked for the sca open team

Shake 'n Bake · Post by **Shake 'n Bake** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:57 am

[/quote]Hoping that the Scott Krutli named for Noarlunga is not Shaun from South Road playing under a different name. Captain of Noarlunga up to some old tricks???

Any rules about players transferring between sides and back to the original club.[/quote]

ASCA are obviously ok with as there agreed for it to happen[/quote]

i heard the sca r goin to change their rules because of this so it doesnt happen again and i heard its a long shot but cause the sca rnt happy with it they will not get picked for the sca open team[/quote]

That would be the SCA lose wouldn't it? And why does he need to play for SCA to play for this SA country side? Why not go district if he wonts to play a higher level of cricket

wycbloods · Post by **wycbloods** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:50 pm

WYC Scored and impressive 2/387

Russ King 140*
Pressy 109
Hopkins 51* (very quickly)
J Whenan 49

Scored 160 odd of last 19 overs.

Amateur Footy · Post by **Amateur Footy** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:38 pm

wycbloods wrote:WYC Scored and impressive 2/387

Russ King 140*
Pressy 109
Hopkins 51* (very quickly)
J Whenan 49

Scored 160 odd of last 19 overs.

That's a great score, all coming from the usual suspects and plenty to Xavier Traz by the looks. So I assume Morphy's haven't got any players back. Will there be a return of any of their players or are they done?

wycbloods · Post by **wycbloods** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:26 pm

Anyone got some ideas on who will win the trophys this year in section 1

Batting Hutchinson (Sth RD)
Bowling Hopkins (WYC)
GF Between ICC and Sth RD atm
Hewett Medal Hopkins

What does everyone else think.

bay boy · Post by **bay boy** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:11 pm

wycbloods wrote:Anyone got some ideas on who will win the trophys this year in section 1

Batting Hutchinson (Sth RD)
Bowling Hopkins (WYC)
GF Between ICC and Sth RD atm
Hewett Medal Hopkins

What does everyone else think.

Hutchinson youv'e got to be kidding don't u

Even though Krutli (southrd) is missing 3 games he will beat Hutchinson
Hutchinson will struggle to get 300 runs

Amateur Footy · Post by **Amateur Footy** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:00 pm

Still not sure about South Road for GF.....will have a better idea next round when the Ramblers knock them off. I may be biased, buut don't discount the ramblers yet...have made some very impressive additions to the side this year and may yet have more to come.

Still think it's a 6 team race.

rainbow warrior · Post by **rainbow warrior** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:13 pm

Amateur Footy wrote:Still not sure about South Road for GF.....will have a better idea next round when the Ramblers knock them off. I may be biased, buut don't discount the ramblers yet...have made some very impressive additions to the side this year and may yet have more to come.

Still think it's a 6 team race.

What grade is big Damien Allen playing for the Ramblers? Good bloke and he has said he is playing out there.

Shake 'n Bake · Post by **Shake 'n Bake** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:15 pm

This forums boy quirk scores 171 is enough enough or is this kid just going to keep cross batting average attacks in sec 5 all year and bosting his chest. Fair enough still he wants to play with his father but his fathers hand can only reach so far. I think its time to let go and test yourself

Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Re: Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

Who is online