The Orange Maggot wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:The 6 team comp got squashed because it was poorly explained at the AGM, ALL of the top 2 division clubs should have been invited to the initial discussions, opposed to the small group that thought they were on a winner. It became a us against them situation rather than coming to an amicable decision.
I think that it has strong merit and should be discussed at the next PDCA meeting, half of the problem was working out gradings for div.1, they couldn't really drop 4 teams down to div. 2 to allow Virginia & ATCO to be promoted and there seemed to be no fair solution. However, if it set in concrete early this year, they could have the top 5 stay up, the div. 2 premiers get promoted and keep it as 1 up, 1 down for future years.
One Tree Hill were strongly opposed to it as they were going to be relegated and really wanted to stay up, I could see thier point, if they knew earlier in the year the requirements to retain their spot in div. 1, they'd have no leg to stand on.
It's been a bit of a dog's breakfast with the grading's etc. so far this year, there's not a lot that can be done now, we should all just make sure that we are better prepared as an association next season and be more proactive as clubs in the running and laws of the PDCA.
Your on the money LM The meeting in early April was set up by the PDCA and 4 clubs. The BL delegate put it to the floor at the last PDCA meeting that if any club wanted to join in and have discussions regarding changing formats please contact him or Frank. 4 clubs did Tw SW C and Vir with the latter not coming. I agree, not much information was given out before the AGM which dissapointed the 4 clubs and the PDCA. The OTH delegate acted very poorly and considering the way they performed in the last game of 2008, they should be in grade 6.I believe the 4 clubs must again act but need more to come on board. The writing is on the wall after 3 weeks. Forfeits, massive scores, sides struggling to field teams, the kids programme changed in every grade. mmmmmm dark days ahead change we must ,use the force basil
Well I'm surprised that you agreed with me given my low "IQ" as per your previous post. My understanding was that your delegate was going to get in touch with our delegate along with some others and come up with a few draft plans to present at the AGM, apparently we weren't notified and it was sprung on us at the AGM, we were going to support it, it just seemed thrown together on the night, our delegate didn't cast a vote as it was going to have no bearing on us at all.
We all need to get the wheels in motion now to be ready for next season. I must say, the PDCA have done well so far, they were let down by a few clubs pulling junior sides out far too late. It's not rocket science, if you have 20+ kids, you put 2 teams in, if you have any less, you put 1 team in, if you have less than 5, pull your side out.
We don't advertise as we can't cater for excessive amounts of kids, 1 team in each grade is enough, no extra grounds, coaches, scorers, umpires etc. We'd prefer to have 8 players than 14, as we know we'll pick a couple up along the way and everybody gets a game every week.
As for OTH, I was surprised to hear that they were so passionate about staying in div. 1, they were pretty poor at times during the season, I thought some re-building in div. 2 would've helped them immensely.