Pidge wrote:I agree Phantom. 208 is probably a sub par score.
The game will probably go until about 6:30 as from my experience in div 5 this season PV liked to time waste.
Saying that, i'd still have Enfield as slight favourites as runs on the board especially in finals is important.
I agree mate Enfield still slight favs but im not willing to risk an extra $400 on a coin toss. This season PV 'C' have shown they are capable of scores above 200 and on that oval i would think it would suit Shannon Ai$$$$$$$$tropes game to a tee... the big man will make a half ton i think..
no half tone bowled j mcleod caught m beckman this was the wicket that won the GF well played all great spirits by both teams but can only be one winner thats me hehehehehehe and the other 11 blokes
Pidge wrote:I agree Phantom. 208 is probably a sub par score.
The game will probably go until about 6:30 as from my experience in div 5 this season PV liked to time waste.
Saying that, i'd still have Enfield as slight favourites as runs on the board especially in finals is important.
I agree mate Enfield still slight favs but im not willing to risk an extra $400 on a coin toss. This season PV 'C' have shown they are capable of scores above 200 and on that oval i would think it would suit Shannon Ai$$$$$$$$tropes game to a tee... the big man will make a half ton i think..
no half tone bowled j mcleod caught m beckman this was the wicket that won the GF well played all great spirits by both teams but can only be one winner thats me hehehehehehe and the other 11 blokes
No1_Source wrote:haha that would be 10 others special that wicket and when captain wise bowled captain brown that was just as good he was starting to hit a few..
indeed all wickets are vital but all post previous stated that this bloke was going to tear us apart.brown also was a vital wicket but he was in a possition he did not want to be under because of the pressure the whole team applied just stating that you cant depend on one or two blokes to do the job this is why we win and everyone else folds.
No1_Source wrote:haha that would be 10 others special that wicket and when captain wise bowled captain brown that was just as good he was starting to hit a few..
indeed all wickets are vital but all post previous stated that this bloke was going to tear us apart.brown also was a vital wicket but he was in a possition he did not want to be under because of the pressure the whole team applied just stating that you cant depend on one or two blokes to do the job this is why we win and everyone else folds.
No1_Source wrote:haha that would be 10 others special that wicket and when captain wise bowled captain brown that was just as good he was starting to hit a few..
indeed all wickets are vital but all post previous stated that this bloke was going to tear us apart.brown also was a vital wicket but he was in a possition he did not want to be under because of the pressure the whole team applied just stating that you cant depend on one or two blokes to do the job this is why we win and everyone else folds.
nice photo goat herder what the hell is wrong with vines was a funny g/f . but i guess the old saying is true . anything can happen in a grand final . well done to both sides in making it. but extremely well done to para vista also well bowled frick
Time taken to get 10 of the 11 para vista premiership players to look normal in order to take a photo - 106 minutes (please note j.Vines is a lost cause)
well . rumour is paralowie will be merging with someone from our div or someone who use to be. but only rumour but from good source. other rumour will get new umpires
Smasha wrote:well . rumour is paralowie will be merging with someone from our div or someone who use to be. but only rumour but from good source. other rumour will get new umpires
Smasha wrote:well . rumour is paralowie will be merging with someone from our div or someone who use to be. but only rumour but from good source. other rumour will get new umpires
Cmon Lads Chinese whispers suck, lets get into the nitty gritty..names..places..evidence.
Just as a side question what is the association gonna do if they keep losing teams/clubs? Running a competition is one thing, growing it and ensuring the longevity of the competition is another.
automaticwicky wrote:Cmon Lads Chinese whispers suck, lets get into the nitty gritty..names..places..evidence.
Just as a side question what is the association gonna do if they keep losing teams/clubs? Running a competition is one thing, growing it and ensuring the longevity of the competition is another.
Its not my place to give specifics sorry, im sure in due time when the parties involved are ready then they will let you know
In regards to your other query i dont really know the answer, this assoc is a funny one since majority of clubs involved are formed out of churches or such and few have club rooms etc, also there are no juniors or junior programs so obviously no players being filtered through and of course if you dont have players to replace players eventually the river will run dry..
i think the assoc should talk more with teams from said assoc and see what they have to say. rather than making up there own solutions all the time.Then maybe we as clubs will have fairer goes.so maybe it is time we all stand up and put our thoughts together and see what happens.just my thoughts.
Remember that our association presentation night is on this Friday night at the Adelaide Lutheran clubrooms from 6pm. Bar facilities and a BBQ will be available.
Come along and catch up on all the gossip first hand.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
what the hell is wrong with vines 
also well bowled frick 
