Round 22 - Possibilities and Probabilities.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:15 pm

With both clubs having record members I cant see the AFL passing up the almighty dollar when everything they do regarding fixturing etc is aimed at maximising profits.
Not fussed if its at Etihad apart from the fact a lot of fans would be locked out

Ron Burgundy · Post by **Ron Burgundy** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:24 pm

carey wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Spargo wrote:See ya next year cows. We should've iced it much earlier.

with the exception of the first quarter, and ziebell, i dont think you guys deserved the win either.

crows dominated most of the game but just couldnt put it on the scoreboard. ziebell was the difference in that regard

But you have 'The Best' Full forward in the game as well as the most expensive forward pocket ever surely it's not the forward lines fault with them to up there?????

Oh the Port scum win a match and find their voice.

carey · Post by **carey** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:27 pm

Its 14 wins mate.

Better luck next year!

carey · Post by **carey** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:29 pm

A sure sign you've hit a nerve when it results in name calling..... Gold :lol:

Ron Burgundy · Post by **Ron Burgundy** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:32 pm

Sorry xx

Yeah today was a kick in the guts. There's been a few, but in reality we have too many average footballers at the moment. Walker and betts don't fit in that category but.

Ruben Carter · Post by **Ruben Carter** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:35 pm

Ron Burgundy wrote:
carey wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Spargo wrote:See ya next year cows. We should've iced it much earlier.

with the exception of the first quarter, and ziebell, i dont think you guys deserved the win either.

crows dominated most of the game but just couldnt put it on the scoreboard. ziebell was the difference in that regard

But you have 'The Best' Full forward in the game as well as the most expensive forward pocket ever surely it's not the forward lines fault with them to up there?????

Oh the Port scum win a match and find their voice.

Ouch Ron, that hurts we do have feelings you know.... :lol:

As Ken says, you get what you deserve (mediocrity)

Ron Burgundy · Post by **Ron Burgundy** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:39 pm

It's a term you blokes would be familiar with. Hopefully we aren't there for too long.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:06 pm

Nice bit of play by Dempsey

Ruben Carter · Post by **Ruben Carter** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:07 pm

Ron Burgundy wrote:It's a term you blokes would be familiar with. Hopefully we aren't there for too long.

circa 2006-2011 maybe- apart from that period, the last 100 years haven't been too bad I reckon..

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:16 pm

Ruben Carter wrote:
Ron Burgundy wrote:It's a term you blokes would be familiar with. Hopefully we aren't there for too long.

circa 2006-2011 maybe- apart from that period, the last 100 years haven't been too bad I reckon..

SANFL thread is that way >

Q. · Post by Q. » Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:55 pm

We got any players left for our last game?

daysofourlives · Post by **daysofourlives** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:02 pm

No 30 up to his old tricks, no surprise there, loves Geelong

Ron Burgundy · Post by **Ron Burgundy** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:18 pm

Few dodgy calls against the hawks in some bad spots but geelong have been fast and have controlled the ball.

Why can't they just get too old and slow....

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:25 pm

daysofourlives wrote:No 30 up to his old tricks, no surprise there, loves Geelong

So duncan stokes Guthrie having 67 touches before half time has nothing to do with it?

carey · Post by **carey** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:27 pm

These rabbits at half time banging on about how bad Melbourne have been and only kicking 21 points for a half blah blah blah maybe if these dicks look at the game there at The Hawks have kicked less in the first half!

We know Melbourne are shit, but for the Cats to keep the Hawks to 20 points in a half is a great effort.

daysofourlives · Post by **daysofourlives** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:36 pm

bennymacca wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:No 30 up to his old tricks, no surprise there, loves Geelong

So duncan stokes Guthrie having 67 touches before half time has nothing to do with it?

Where did i say the scoreline has anything to do with the umpires DH.
I'm more than happy for Geelong to keep winning the minor round games, I have even backed them for a small fortune
At least we will be playing in two weeks time.

Just referring to the Bartel free. Bet he wont cop the same scrutiny as Thomas does and IMO this was far worse than the Thomas push in the back.

cracka · Post by **cracka** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:58 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:No 30 up to his old tricks, no surprise there, loves Geelong

So duncan stokes Guthrie having 67 touches before half time has nothing to do with it?

Where did i say the scoreline has anything to do with the umpires DH.
I'm more than happy for Geelong to keep winning the minor round games, I have even backed them for a small fortune
At least we will be playing in two weeks time.

Just referring to the Bartel free. Bet he wont cop the same scrutiny as Thomas does and IMO this was far worse than the Thomas push in the back.

Wasn't it you who said if you have to resort to name calling then you've lost the argument.

And yes Bartels dive was bad but nowhere near as bad as Thomas.

Q. · Post by Q. » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:01 pm

I'm confused...why do we have video review again?

Magpiespower · Post by **Magpiespower** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:04 pm

Q. wrote:I'm confused...why do we have video review again?

Professional troll?

Finally get a camera on the goal line.

And they still get it wrong.

Unbelievable.

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:09 pm

Trolling the Hawks again. Catters home.

regards,

REB