England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/7/13

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)
Post Reply
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47498
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4842 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by Dutchy »

Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.

And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

Dutchy wrote:Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.

And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!

When was there any doubt last night?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

whufc wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
whufc wrote:Yep no issue with broad or Haddin for that matter.

Its the system thats the issue, the drs sole purpose was to get rid of the howler yet the biggest howler in the game still stood.

Isn't that clarke's fault for wasting a referral on an lbw appeal that would not of been out even with 4 stumps?


Isn't accepting the umpires decision a bigger part of the game than questioning an umpires decision

Personally I would rather see bad decisions influence a game rather than who uses a review system strategically better

Have you logged in wrong? Sound like kickinit.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
Posts: 11379
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Salisbury
Location: Burnside, 5066
Has thanked: 341 times
Been thanked: 172 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by CENTURION »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.

And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!

When was there any doubt last night?

none, the umpire had doubt but the review system worked this time, he was out.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by RustyCage »

I don't know how the ump didn't give it out live, was clearly out.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47498
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4842 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by Dutchy »

How? No clear evidence on hot spot and the noise was well after the ball went past the bat. On what basis did he over rule the umpires decision?
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29218
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by whufc »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
whufc wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
whufc wrote:Yep no issue with broad or Haddin for that matter.

Its the system thats the issue, the drs sole purpose was to get rid of the howler yet the biggest howler in the game still stood.

Isn't that clarke's fault for wasting a referral on an lbw appeal that would not of been out even with 4 stumps?


Isn't accepting the umpires decision a bigger part of the game than questioning an umpires decision

Personally I would rather see bad decisions influence a game rather than who uses a review system strategically better

Have you logged in wrong? Sound like kickinit.


:lol:
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by stampy »

that last review was inconclusive proven by the amount of time it took, that being the case the batsman should have been given the benefit of the doubt, pure and simple
Go The Tiges!!!
Killa
Under 18s
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:43 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: South Augusta
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by Killa »

Dutchy wrote:How? No clear evidence on hot spot and the noise was well after the ball went past the bat. On what basis did he over rule the umpires decision?

There was conclusive evidence with hot spot front on and side on and then through the stump microphone. There was no doubt, just Dar with no guts to give it out after his blunders and let England use drs to make the decision.
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
Posts: 11379
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Salisbury
Location: Burnside, 5066
Has thanked: 341 times
Been thanked: 172 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by CENTURION »

Dutchy wrote:Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.

And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!

and every ball bowled needs to be checked for a no ball. DRS or not, that's one thing that can be & should be checked every ball, pretty quick & easy to do.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 169 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by Grahaml »

No doubt at all that was out. Clear spot on the bat exactly where the ball passed. The noise was a clear edge sound and nothing else could have made that. Ball didn't hit pad and bat didn't hit pad. The sound not matching up perfectly is no proof because the sound and picture are captured by different devices. They try to match those up as best they can but the exact timing is managed, which is why snicko isn't used for referrals.

I've also no sympathy for times that there are howlers and the referrals are used up. They're there to overturn terrible decisions. On that basis, no captain should ever get a referral wrong. If captains want to start using it as a tactic, you've just got to wear the odd time down the track you get a real rough one.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47498
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4842 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by Dutchy »

Killa wrote:
Dutchy wrote:How? No clear evidence on hot spot and the noise was well after the ball went past the bat. On what basis did he over rule the umpires decision?

There was conclusive evidence with hot spot front on and side on and then through the stump microphone. There was no doubt, just Dar with no guts to give it out after his blunders and let England use drs to make the decision.


No there was no hot spot, otherwise it would have been given out without going to the audio, he was given out on the audio which didnt match up and could have been from anything.
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
Posts: 11379
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Salisbury
Location: Burnside, 5066
Has thanked: 341 times
Been thanked: 172 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by CENTURION »

I saw a little white spot on the side of the bat.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
cripple
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:21 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Mexico
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by cripple »

Definite hot spot just lower then the sticker. Used sound as extra proof. If Haddin didn't hit it, he would've been a lot more upset then what he was.
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by RustyCage »

Definitely hit it, and as others have rightly said, Haddin would have reacted differently if he was shafted, he definitely isn't someone who would hide his emotions and not say anything!
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

Was a hot spot and sound.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
Failed Creation
Coach
Posts: 21225
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:42 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Gawler Central
Location: Location, Location.
Has thanked: 3338 times
Been thanked: 616 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by Failed Creation »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Was a hot spot and sound.


Spot on. Although they looked at the hot spot quite a few times to make sure the white mark didn't appear before the ball passed the bat.
Politicians kissing babies for good luck,
TV preachers sell salvation for a buck.
You don't need no golden cross to tell you wrong from right,
The world's worst murderers were those who saw the light.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36137
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12448 times
Been thanked: 1745 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by The Dark Knight »

I'm absolutely guttered that we lost it. I heard the nick straight away and knew Haddin was out unfortunately. Felt sorry for him after playing so well, it's a credit to him for batting the way he did when the pressure was on. Boof needs to swing the axe, Cowan needs to drop out, it f**king pissed me off to see him get out to a part spinner in Joe Root. I was glad Rogers got some runs in the second innings and he'll get better and better, it's great to see him in the test eleven. I think the bowlers will retain their spots for the seond test with only Starc the only one who could maybe get dropped for Jackson Bird, I would love to see him in there.

The momentum shift in this test match was crazy, it changed every session, neither side had complete dominance for two whole sessions in a row, it was great to watch. Can't wait for the second test on Thursday.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by tigerpie »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
whufc wrote:Yep no issue with broad or Haddin for that matter.

Its the system thats the issue, the drs sole purpose was to get rid of the howler yet the biggest howler in the game still stood.

Isn't that clarke's fault for wasting a referral on an lbw appeal that would not of been out even with 4 stumps?

No its not! That was a friggin shocker and was plain and simple the umpires responsibility to give that out. Brain fart,or is it a symptom bought on by the fact DRS is there as a backup.
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
Posts: 11379
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Salisbury
Location: Burnside, 5066
Has thanked: 341 times
Been thanked: 172 times
Contact:

Re: England v Australia, 1st Test TRENT BRIDGE commences 10/

Post by CENTURION »

it's simple. if you're gonna have a drs, use it for every bloody ball & not to be used just when a player calls for it, if not, piss it off!!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests