Look Good In Leather wrote:Otherwise known as the "Protect the Amateur League from those nasty country teams rule"
I think you mean "Protect the depth of Div 1 and 2 Amateur League from both lower division C9AFL teams and those nasty country teams"
The SAAFL are implementing internal clauses like this so SAAFL players have more incentive to remain in the SAAFL, seems logical to me. Maybe leagues like the Barossa should follow suit, instead of not allowing any internal transfer and making players leave their league if they want a change of club.
Its not an internal clause and when you think affiliated league, think division also
Yep, misread it, sorry. Might stop clubs from poaching Under 18s with the potential to be very good senior footballers in the future.
Look Good In Leather wrote:Otherwise known as the "Protect the Amateur League from those nasty country teams rule"
I think you mean "Protect the depth of Div 1 and 2 Amateur League from both lower division C9AFL teams and those nasty country teams"
The SAAFL are implementing internal clauses like this so SAAFL players have more incentive to remain in the SAAFL, seems logical to me. Maybe leagues like the Barossa should follow suit, instead of not allowing any internal transfer and making players leave their league if they want a change of club.
Its not an internal clause and when you think affiliated league, think division also
A division is not an affiliated league, the C9AFL is the affiliated league.
Another poorly thought out rule by the C9AFL (who now control the CFL, hence it has been added), aimed to protect their league, will just make opposition players within the league more attractive as they are 0 pointers, watch the cannibalism!
Mr Beefy wrote:I think you mean "Protect the depth of Div 1 and 2 Amateur League from both lower division C9AFL teams and those nasty country teams"
The SAAFL are implementing internal clauses like this so SAAFL players have more incentive to remain in the SAAFL, seems logical to me. Maybe leagues like the Barossa should follow suit, instead of not allowing any internal transfer and making players leave their league if they want a change of club.
Its not an internal clause and when you think affiliated league, think division also
A division is not an affiliated league, the C9AFL is the affiliated league.
Another poorly thought out rule by the C9AFL (who now control the CFL, hence it has been added), aimed to protect their league, will just make opposition players within the league more attractive as they are 0 pointers, watch the cannibalism!
9.5 Affiliated Leagues that have divisional competitions will consider each division as a League for the purpose of implementing the APPS.
Pag wrote:The SAAFL are implementing internal clauses like this so SAAFL players have more incentive to remain in the SAAFL, seems logical to me. Maybe leagues like the Barossa should follow suit, instead of not allowing any internal transfer and making players leave their league if they want a change of club.
Its not an internal clause and when you think affiliated league, think division also
A division is not an affiliated league, the C9AFL is the affiliated league.
Another poorly thought out rule by the C9AFL (who now control the CFL, hence it has been added), aimed to protect their league, will just make opposition players within the league more attractive as they are 0 pointers, watch the cannibalism!
9.5 Affiliated Leagues that have divisional competitions will consider each division as a League for the purpose of implementing the APPS.
Look Good In Leather wrote: A division is not an affiliated league, the C9AFL is the affiliated league.
Another poorly thought out rule by the C9AFL (who now control the CFL, hence it has been added), aimed to protect their league, will just make opposition players within the league more attractive as they are 0 pointers, watch the cannibalism!
9.5 Affiliated Leagues that have divisional competitions will consider each division as a League for the purpose of implementing the APPS.
Pine Warmer wrote:Fair get for united, but still wonder why some clubs spend massive on 1 or 2 players and expect to go from bottom to top? You would think if they spread the cash around, recruited 6 or 8 decent divvy 1/2/3 players, even fringe a graders, you would think they would get alot more out of the season.
A point system doesn't allow them to do this.
Yeah but aren't ressie players 0 points? Ive seen plenty of div 1 b grade players that would dominate the plains league. Bring in 4 a graders worth 3 points each and throw in 3 or 4 zero pointers and ya starting to build a decent side.
I've seen Div 1 A grade 'stars' not be able to dominate a lot of country leagues including the Plains, what makes you think B Graders can...
Look Good In Leather wrote: A division is not an affiliated league, the C9AFL is the affiliated league.
Another poorly thought out rule by the C9AFL (who now control the CFL, hence it has been added), aimed to protect their league, will just make opposition players within the league more attractive as they are 0 pointers, watch the cannibalism!
9.5 Affiliated Leagues that have divisional competitions will consider each division as a League for the purpose of implementing the APPS.
Good
Yes, you were wrong, no apology needed
What's good?
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
Mr Beefy wrote:9.5 Affiliated Leagues that have divisional competitions will consider each division as a League for the purpose of implementing the APPS.
Pine Warmer wrote:Fair get for united, but still wonder why some clubs spend massive on 1 or 2 players and expect to go from bottom to top? You would think if they spread the cash around, recruited 6 or 8 decent divvy 1/2/3 players, even fringe a graders, you would think they would get alot more out of the season.
A point system doesn't allow them to do this.
Yeah but aren't ressie players 0 points? Ive seen plenty of div 1 b grade players that would dominate the plains league. Bring in 4 a graders worth 3 points each and throw in 3 or 4 zero pointers and ya starting to build a decent side.
I've seen Div 1 A grade 'stars' not be able to dominate a lot of country leagues including the Plains, what makes you think B Graders can...
Coz Goodwoods 2's would beat most of the plains league
