Trial matches
- DOC
- Coach
- Posts: 20257
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Has thanked: 934 times
- Been thanked: 2496 times
- Contact:
-
northerner
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:48 pm
- Team: Central District
- Team: Eastern Park
- Has thanked: 295 times
- Been thanked: 573 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
-
gazzamagoo
Re: Trial matches
northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.
- Big Phil
- Coach
- Posts: 20316
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
- Has thanked: 122 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
gazzamagoo wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.
See above, Gazza.
-
gazzamagoo
Re: Trial matches
Big Phil wrote:gazzamagoo wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.
See above, Gazza.
My back is bent, my eyes are weak..............
-
northerner
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:48 pm
- Team: Central District
- Team: Eastern Park
- Has thanked: 295 times
- Been thanked: 573 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
Big Phil wrote:gazzamagoo wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.
See above, Gazza.
And further to that he is definitely a big bodied (mid) recruit... in fact some have confused him with Buechner (BP!)
-
gazzamagoo
Re: Trial matches
northerner wrote:Big Phil wrote:gazzamagoo wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs will play round one with 8 or 9 debutantes.
5 recruits
McCormack as a mobile ruck is a very good pick up.
Buechner as a big bodied full back is going to be excellent and allows Llewellyn to shift to the pocket.
Kendall an active, pack crashing fwd is a bonus.
Launer and Reeves add bite and strength to the mids.
Then some local teenagers
Whitelum and Gant who both played impressively in the last 6 weeks in the reserves last season (after playing all season at College and Country league respectively) and have continued to show in the trials that they will impact at this level.
Richards and Deakin are two young talls who would also be in the mix.
This season, I believe our top 22 is better than in the past 4 seasons. We are taller and cleaner with the skills, and there appears a willingness to contest.
What we lack though is the depth of previous seasons. With so may peripheral players no longer at the Club, the ressies are mainly going to be filled up with kids who might be a season or two away from being league-ready.
I know he's not a big-bodied recruit but don't forget Bailey Reeves too.
I don't care if the reserves lose every match, as long as they hang around & learn better skills.
See above, Gazza.
And further to that he is definitely a big bodied (mid) recruit... in fact some have confused him with Buechner (BP!)
Now that the NT season is over, Jamie Jones is joining us from Nightcliff, another defender.
- Hazydog
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: Paralowie
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
He was named in the ressies on Saturday - did he play?
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
-
TDJ44
- Under 16s
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:03 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 250 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
Hazydog wrote:He was named in the ressies on Saturday - did he play?
Yes he did,wears a helmet.
- DOC
- Coach
- Posts: 20257
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:15 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Has thanked: 934 times
- Been thanked: 2496 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
No side was undefeated in the trial games.
I think there will be a lot of confusion/adjusting to the stand rule.
I think there will be a lot of confusion/adjusting to the stand rule.
-
oldfella
- Under 16s
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:47 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
On face value as a West Adelaide's support the performance against a team i have high respect for Glenelg (top 5 IMO) gives me hope for this season will not be as bad as last year for us long suffering Bloods supporters .
But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please
But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please
-
Spargo
- Coach
- Posts: 17680
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Team: Sacred Heart OC
- Location: Getting out of Dodge
- Has thanked: 6417 times
- Been thanked: 5688 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
oldfella wrote:On face value as a West Adelaide's support the performance against a team i have high respect for Glenelg (top 5 IMO) gives me hope for this season will not be as bad as last year for us long suffering Bloods supporters .
But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please
I watched the trial vs North but not against West. We played a near full strength side both times.
It was also over 30 degrees at Richmond last week, different players were managed I’m told.
Trial game form is just that, forgotten already.
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Time to get moving…
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Time to get moving…
-
Fluffbag
- Under 16s
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:24 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Modbury
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Re: Trial matches
oldfella wrote:On face value as a West Adelaide's support the performance against a team i have high respect for Glenelg (top 5 IMO) gives me hope for this season will not be as bad as last year for us long suffering Bloods supporters .
But the real question in trying to judge this is how strong was the Glenelg side --- can a Bay supporter give me some feedback on the Bays in this trial game please
Long Suffering Bloods Supporters? At least you seen a premiership in your lifetime (assuming you are over 6 years old)
I never seen a GF win in colour!
- RB
- Coach
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
- Has thanked: 931 times
- Been thanked: 1392 times
- Contact:
Re: Trial matches
Fluffbag wrote:I never seen a GF win in colour!
The 1964 grand final was actually played in colour, but yes no colour footage of it unfortunately.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 254 guests
