Hackham Hawks

A Mum · Post by **A Mum** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:36 am

Have the boys in question been training (at Hackham) smelly?

smelly · Post by **smelly** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:40 am

Some have and some have gone walkabout

Sorry Dude · Post by **Sorry Dude** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:43 am

it is a bit disapointing that is has come to this as they are very good footballers, and would have helped us to where we want to go in the 09 season. but you cant force people to stay where they dont want to be. but like smelly said it might be a bit hard to get 2 clearances in the year.....

A Mum · Post by **A Mum** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:50 am

I'd say very disappointing for you guys.
You'd think if someone were to commit, sign a clearance etc, that they'd stay even if for just one season

Will be interesting to see what does happen with clearances etc.

smelly · Post by **smelly** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:58 am

Yes it is disappionting but they may still may play at Hackham and if they dont we will get on with our job of re building our club

A Mum · Post by **A Mum** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:08 am

Exactly right.

I hope it all goes well for you guys O:)

Professor Plump · Post by **Professor Plump** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:36 am

hackham hawk wrote:it is a bit disapointing that is has come to this as they are very good footballers, and would have helped us to where we want to go in the 09 season. but you cant force people to stay where they dont want to be. but like smelly said it might be a bit hard to get 2 clearances in the year.....

I spoke to one of the players yesterday who has been cleared to Hackham but is now training with Aldinga?? said he knows the coach at Aldinga which is the exact same reason he went to Hackham in the first place. Bit stupid if ya ask me

smelly · Post by **smelly** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:42 am

Your write PP y sign at a club and then change your mind this show's no respect for Dennis i think

shoe boy · Post by **shoe boy** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:45 am

hackham hawk wrote:it is a bit disapointing that is has come to this as they are very good footballers, and would have helped us to where we want to go in the 09 season. but you cant force people to stay where they dont want to be. but like smelly said it might be a bit hard to get 2 clearances in the year.....

Simple you clear them to where they want to play!

Why have someone on your list that doesnt want to be there??

Do as many clearances as you want till june 30

smelly · Post by **smelly** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:54 am

Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

eagles23 · Post by **eagles23** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:10 pm

smelly wrote:Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

I've heard they were 'encouraged' to sign on the first night they trained down there.
As they are all fairly young I guess they found it hard to say no.

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:18 pm

eagles23 wrote:
smelly wrote:Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

I've heard they were 'encouraged' to sign on the first night they trained down there.
As they are all fairly young I guess they found it hard to say no.

Im pretty sure they'd been training with us a few weeks before signing. Still piss weak to leave before even playing in a trial game.

spanner · Post by **spanner** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:28 pm

smelly wrote:Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

we are talking young lads not mature men.
The kids properly dont have someone to turn to for advice except club coaches who are telling them to sign for them and are more worried about their future and not the yound lads

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:36 pm

spanner wrote:
smelly wrote:Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

we are talking young lads not mature men.
The kids properly dont have someone to turn to for advice except club coaches who are telling them to sign for them and are more worried about their future and not the yound lads

You talking like someone got on their case about signing. Dennis invited them to play for us. They came out to training. We asked them if they want to sign, like you would with anyone, since they have to be signed to play and the season was approaching. They signed. Then left a few weeks later.

I hope they decide to stick around but they're not showing much respect to a great coach who is as respectful a person as ive ever met.

spanner · Post by **spanner** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:15 pm

hackham_hawk_3 wrote:
spanner wrote:
smelly wrote:
we are talking young lads not mature men.
The kids properly dont have someone to turn to for advice except club coaches who are telling them to sign for them and are more worried about their future and not the yound lads

You talking like someone got on their case about signing. Dennis invited them to play for us. They came out to training. We asked them if they want to sign, like you would with anyone, since they have to be signed to play and the season was approaching. They signed. Then left a few weeks later.

I hope they decide to stick around but they're not showing much respect to a great coach who is as respectful a person as ive ever met.

Mate relax dont even know the kids and the comment was not directed at any perticular coach.
My point was there young and by the sounds of it they have got clubs chasing them they need someone independent (father) to advise them.
personally i would rather your club get there services

Bag The Points · Post by **Bag The Points** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:19 pm

Poaching from Hackham is about as low as you can get :evil:

Professor Plump · Post by **Professor Plump** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:36 pm

spanner wrote:
smelly wrote:Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

we are talking young lads not mature men.
The kids properly dont have someone to turn to for advice except club coaches who are telling them to sign for them and are more worried about their future and not the yound lads

these players are hardly young lads, they were all aged 20-23. Probably need to start maturing soon :roll:

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:38 pm

Professor Plump wrote:
spanner wrote:
smelly wrote:Shoe Boy i agree with you but y sign in the first place ?

we are talking young lads not mature men.
The kids properly dont have someone to turn to for advice except club coaches who are telling them to sign for them and are more worried about their future and not the yound lads

these players are hardly young lads, they were all aged 20-23. Probably need to start maturing soon

I was thinking the same thing. They'd be older than me.

Zelezny Chucks · Post by **Zelezny Chucks** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:39 pm

Bag The Points wrote:Poaching from Hackham is about as low as you can get

Calm down BTP no one said anything about poaching.

Jayne · Post by **Jayne** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:11 pm

shoe boy wrote:
hackham hawk wrote:it is a bit disapointing that is has come to this as they are very good footballers, and would have helped us to where we want to go in the 09 season. but you cant force people to stay where they dont want to be. but like smelly said it might be a bit hard to get 2 clearances in the year.....

Simple you clear them to where they want to play!

Why have someone on your list that doesnt want to be there??

Do as many clearances as you want till june 30

Here here...

Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Re: Hackham Hawks

Who is online