Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
-
LaughingKookaburra
- Coach
- Posts: 6334
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:52 am
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Kenilworth
- Has thanked: 74 times
- Been thanked: 816 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Who points at the scoreboard at 1/4 time when you're 4-5 up? Good work Hamish....
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
-
westozfalcon
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:00 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Brisbane Lions
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 113 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
I thought Ken Hinkley handled that post-match press conference really well. Michelangelo Rucci was trying to put him to the sword and had a disgracefully condescending manner..asking questions with his hand resting on his chin etc. I thought Hinkley showed class by sitting back down without complaint to answer another Rucci question when the interview seemed over.
- Grenville
- Veteran
- Posts: 3709
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:23 pm
- Team: Central District
- Has thanked: 262 times
- Been thanked: 761 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
As an neutral who went tonight I can honestly say that is one of the most appalling umpiring displays (both ways) I have ever seen. And why were the Port supporters booing Dangerfield?
- marbles
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Carlton
- Location: Titan
- Has thanked: 295 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Grenville wrote:As an neutral who went tonight I can honestly say that is one of the most appalling umpiring displays (both ways) I have ever seen. And why were the Port supporters booing Dangerfield?
danger pulled hartlett to the ground first quarter
Edit: it was ebert actually sorry
Last edited by marbles on Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bum Crack
- Coach
- Posts: 8006
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:50 pm
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Berri
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 329 times
- Been thanked: 923 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Grenville wrote:As an neutral who went tonight I can honestly say that is one of the most appalling umpiring displays (both ways) I have ever seen. And why were the Port supporters booing Dangerfield?
Because they're a mob of **** and shit ones at that
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Geelong were ways going to work there way intonthe game. I thought there ruck combo was excellent, and the stoppage work was very good.
Port are just not good enough. And as much as we all say the crows looks better without Dangerfield, Geelong certainly look better for having him!
Port are just not good enough. And as much as we all say the crows looks better without Dangerfield, Geelong certainly look better for having him!
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
-
TEX07
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1461
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:10 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Golden Grove
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
stan wrote:Geelong were ways going to work there way intonthe game. I thought there ruck combo was excellent, and the stoppage work was very good.
Port are just not good enough. And as much as we all say the crows looks better without Dangerfield, Geelong certainly look better for having him!
I think the crows have just adapted better to not having Dangerfield than everyone expected, I can't see any side who would be better without him in it.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
TEX07 wrote:stan wrote:Geelong were ways going to work there way intonthe game. I thought there ruck combo was excellent, and the stoppage work was very good.
Port are just not good enough. And as much as we all say the crows looks better without Dangerfield, Geelong certainly look better for having him!
I think the crows have just adapted better to not having Dangerfield than everyone expected, I can't see any side who would be better without him in it.
Very true.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
-
MW
- Coach
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 2804 times
- Been thanked: 2098 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
westozfalcon wrote:I thought Ken Hinkley handled that post-match press conference really well. Michelangelo Rucci was trying to put him to the sword and had a disgracefully condescending manner..asking questions with his hand resting on his chin etc. I thought Hinkley showed class by sitting back down without complaint to answer another Rucci question when the interview seemed over.
Ken is good at talking...
-
MW
- Coach
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 2804 times
- Been thanked: 2098 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Reckon there was about 20,000 left in the crowd at Adelaide oval with about 2 minutes to go...funny for a supporter group who don't leave early.
- Grenville
- Veteran
- Posts: 3709
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:23 pm
- Team: Central District
- Has thanked: 262 times
- Been thanked: 761 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
They started leaving in droves from the 11min mark of the last quarter. They were booing Dangerfield pretty early on,before any shenanigans had taken place. Not a great game, Geelong were workmanlike, Port were a rabble.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64099
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8790 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
MW wrote:Reckon there was about 20,000 left in the crowd at Adelaide oval with about 2 minutes to go...funny for a supporter group who don't leave early.
Reckon you're wrong with the figure, and it always makes me laugh, who gives a **** when people leave? Pathetically childish in my view.
Do you question people who show up late or go for a piss mid quarter?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51721
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:30 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
MW wrote:Reckon there was about 20,000 left in the crowd at Adelaide oval with about 2 minutes to go...funny for a supporter group who don't leave early.
Bloody Geelong fans leaving early.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
-
MW
- Coach
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 2804 times
- Been thanked: 2098 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Wedgie wrote:MW wrote:Reckon there was about 20,000 left in the crowd at Adelaide oval with about 2 minutes to go...funny for a supporter group who don't leave early.
Bloody Geelong fans leaving early.
I know right, arrogant pricks
- Corona Man
- Coach
- Posts: 13229
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 1:58 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Hawthorn
- Team: Echunga
- Location: Near the Beer Fridge
- Has thanked: 1354 times
- Been thanked: 3821 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Jimmy Toumpass could have left early.... To a standing ovation!
1961, 1971, 1976, 1978, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015.... And don't you forget it!
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51721
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:30 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Corona Man wrote:Jimmy Toumpass could have left early.... To a standing ovation!
I think Gray left before the opening bounce!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
-
woodublieve12
- Coach
- Posts: 17951
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Has thanked: 3235 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Rapt with the swans win yesterday. Really good response from the previous week... Teddy Richards was on fire!!!
We should have won by a fair bit more...
We should have won by a fair bit more...
"Be curious, not judgmental""
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64099
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8790 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Geelong targeted Gray and Wingard as our most dangerous at kept them virtually unseen. Enright gave Wingard a bath. Not the first player to be beaten by Boris.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64099
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8790 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: Round 5 & its ensuing palaver.
Corona Man wrote:Jimmy Toumpass could have left early.... To a standing ovation!
My 73 year old Mother would be tougher at the contest.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 191 guests
