It's an outrageous amount of money for a bloke who simply can't defend. When Lever has to defend I'd have Kelly well in front of him. Yes, he plays the loose man role well but, would you pay $800+ for a bloke to play loose man in defense? I certainly wouldn't.
carey wrote:It's an outrageous amount of money for a bloke who simply can't defend. When Lever has to defend I'd have Kelly well in front of him. Yes, he plays the loose man role well but, would you pay $800+ for a bloke to play loose man in defense? I certainly wouldn't.
Agreed, if Melbourne want to pay him that amount of money good luck to him glad the Crows weren't silly enough to do it.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
carey wrote:It's an outrageous amount of money for a bloke who simply can't defend. When Lever has to defend I'd have Kelly well in front of him. Yes, he plays the loose man role well but, would you pay $800+ for a bloke to play loose man in defense? I certainly wouldn't.
when we played Essendon Talia had kept Daniher quiet ad then when they swapped Lever to him Daniher kicked a couple. He still struggles on key forwards, i wouldn't have thought Adelaide's backline suited him perfectly as 3rd option
amber_fluid wrote:Exactly some clubs pay overs for Free agents and some clubs pay overs for 'joe the gooses'.
Except he's neither of these, and this is a big problem with the current setup. Benny mentioned the solution recently. Almost (but not quite) feel sorry for the Corporation.
amber_fluid wrote:Exactly some clubs pay overs for Free agents and some clubs pay overs for 'joe the gooses'.
Except he's neither of these, and this is a big problem with the current setup. Benny mentioned the solution recently. Almost (but not quite) feel sorry for the Corporation.
I was having a dig at the Crows for paying overs for JJ but not paying overs for Lever
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
carey wrote:It's an outrageous amount of money for a bloke who simply can't defend. When Lever has to defend I'd have Kelly well in front of him. Yes, he plays the loose man role well but, would you pay $800+ for a bloke to play loose man in defense? I certainly wouldn't.
when we played Essendon Talia had kept Daniher quiet ad then when they swapped Lever to him Daniher kicked a couple. He still struggles on key forwards, i wouldn't have thought Adelaide's backline suited him perfectly as 3rd option
He is not a key defender though, he plays a certain role that he is very good at. Good luck go him I say, only get to make these sort of $$$’s for a short time.
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
amber_fluid wrote:Exactly some clubs pay overs for Free agents and some clubs pay overs for 'joe the gooses'.
Except he's neither of these, and this is a big problem with the current setup. Benny mentioned the solution recently. Almost (but not quite) feel sorry for the Corporation.
I was having a dig at the Crows for paying overs for JJ but not paying overs for Lever
Oh my bad, I would never intentionally pull someone up for potting Janet Jenkins .. Carry on mate
carey wrote:It's an outrageous amount of money for a bloke who simply can't defend. When Lever has to defend I'd have Kelly well in front of him. Yes, he plays the loose man role well but, would you pay $800+ for a bloke to play loose man in defense? I certainly wouldn't.
when we played Essendon Talia had kept Daniher quiet ad then when they swapped Lever to him Daniher kicked a couple. He still struggles on key forwards, i wouldn't have thought Adelaide's backline suited him perfectly as 3rd option
He is not a key defender though, he plays a certain role that he is very good at. Good luck go him I say, only get to make these sort of $$$’s for a short time.
so if the Crows offered him 600K then that tells me we have some money to play with.
carey wrote:It's an outrageous amount of money for a bloke who simply can't defend. When Lever has to defend I'd have Kelly well in front of him. Yes, he plays the loose man role well but, would you pay $800+ for a bloke to play loose man in defense? I certainly wouldn't.
100% whenever he needs to play man on man defense he gets beaten. Crows will push for 2 first rounders for sure, a player like Lever alone worth it? not in my opinion. But when you're offering more than $800K/year for him then thats what a $800K+ player is worth and thats what they need to push for.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
Only my thought but I reckon McGovern could become a very good defender reads the ball through the air very well. On a side not I bang on but why why why did we sign JJ for so long got a bit of Tippett about him about as useful to the crows as Matthew wade to the Aust cricket side.
Robran wrote:Only my thought but I reckon McGovern could become a very good defender reads the ball through the air very well. On a side not I bang on but why why why did we sign JJ for so long got a bit of Tippett about him about as useful to the crows as Matthew wade to the Aust cricket side.
I think we jumped at shadows with JJ to be honest. Really didnt want to lose another player right after PD and knew that there was still others that could have left. He was never going to go to Brisbane IMO - he is still our third target up forward. Up there he is possibly first. He must have a good manager.
Agree on Gov he could go back but to be honest they do have options - Gov was missed up forward saturday.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español