nuggety goodness wrote: Fwd line of Dahlhous Boyd Dickson Crameri Cloke Stringer Looks ok to me,
Yeah looks ok, one weakness though.............Cloke He shouldn't be on any AFL list next year, the bloke is a liability with his kicking and his ground work is not that impressive either
Going to be a huge offseason. Reports today that WC have been meeting with Hogan's management for atleast 12 months and there is talk that he is back home currently and won't return to Melbourne. The rumour of Goldy asking to be traded out of North has grown also
GWW wrote:I cant see West Coast having anywhere near enough to satisfy Melbourne in a trade for Hogan.
Melbourne will want 2 firsts as a minimum so this years and next or trade out someone with currency like Darling
I reckon it's a massive win for Melbourne if they got Darling for Hogan. I reckon Hogan is a bit of a sook who runs to wrong place and Brendon Goddards his team mates. A bit harsh maybe after a great first season but I watch Melbourne every week and I remain unconvinced by this player.
GWW wrote:I cant see West Coast having anywhere near enough to satisfy Melbourne in a trade for Hogan.
Melbourne will want 2 firsts as a minimum so this years and next or trade out someone with currency like Darling
I reckon it's a massive win for Melbourne if they got Darling for Hogan. I reckon Hogan is a bit of a sook who runs to wrong place and Brendon Goddards his team mates. A bit harsh maybe after a great first season but I watch Melbourne every week and I remain unconvinced by this player.
regards,
REB
Has a huge upside and by all reports his old man is quite ill in Perth and he is very close to him. Apparently at the mid season break he went back to Perth and returned to club in a different frame of mind. 85 goals from his his first 40 goals in a poor side isn't too bad IMO
Anyone see on twitter last night saying Hawks deny telling Breust he is up for trade to facilitate Omera and Mitchell coming to the club? Surely they wouldn't trade Breust out? They probably have to part with a half decent player to get the trades done, the other name being mentioned is James Sicily.
hawks21 wrote:Anyone see on twitter last night saying Hawks deny telling Breust he is up for trade to facilitate Omera and Mitchell coming to the club? Surely they wouldn't trade Breust out? They probably have to part with a half decent player to get the trades done, the other name being mentioned is James Sicily.
Didn't see it. I guess its a matter of what they need (midfield speed) and what they can afford to move on (small forward) as they are well served in that area. Don't want to loose either of them, but you gotta give something to get something. Omera is a worry for me though.
1961, 1971, 1976, 1978, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015.... And don't you forget it!
Booney wrote:I would not be giving Sicily up at all. Not for a bloke who hasn't played for 2 years anyway.
Agreed.
I also agree as he clearly has a bright future ahead of him. But he is a similar mold to Bruest and Gunston so i guess there is a feeling he could be excess.
The thing is, if O'Meara gets on the park and stays there it will be a huge get. The problem is "if".
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards