Clubs in strife

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Post Reply
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:27 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by marbles »

how much does the league charge a club to play a team in a division??
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
Posts: 2079
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:50 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Has thanked: 154 times
Been thanked: 289 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Look Good In Leather »

jo172 wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:A-graders from Div1-3 are 3 points each
B-grades from Div1-3 are 2 points each as are A-Graders from Div4 down

Unless they recruit spuds, they can bring in minimal players.

Effectively the points system only lets you tinker around the edges


Wrong.

B Grade players are worth nothing (apart from SANFL reserves, VFL reserves etc)


Not according to the CFL regulations.


http://www.saafl.asn.au/uploads/Pages/p ... _copy1.pdf


That is from 2012

see page 46 http://www.sacommunityfootball.com.au/f ... h_2014.pdf
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Q. »

morell wrote:
Yank Man wrote:
morell wrote:
Bombers4EVA wrote:Get rid of the points system and paying players and all will be good.
Those two things are definitely factors, but they 2/10s of the overall picture.

Player apathy
Work/Sport Quandary
Competition from other sports
Time poor lifestyles
Geography
Demographics
Club density

etc

It's a complicated story.



A-get used the the points system, the majority are in favour and it's here to stay. Yes I believe there should be more flexibility with it, maybe that will come in time.
B-get used to player payments it's here for good, times changed years ago. Smart clubs work a way to compete without throwing big $$$$ around. Be it right or wrong it ain't changing. :)
I've racked my feeble mind on how to get rid of player payments (for lower divisions in particular) as I think it's having a massive derogatory impact on our sport and league. The only solutions I've ever thought of either require a massive shift in the mindset of the league, sport and its players, or a massive influx of resources to monitor and police it...or support from the state and feds:

If player x is getting income from playing sport, that should be taxed, unless I am mistaken.

Therefore, technically, players that receive said income could be audited and fined by the ATO.

If this happened enough times eventually individuals and clubs would have to begin declaring their payments.

If that then happened for long enough, then there would be records available for, say, an office of Recreation and Sport to begin putting a stamp on it, and possibly, providing some of those records to approved governing bodies, such as the SAAFL.

From there, they could put in policies and regulation to control it.

Pipe dream and perhaps draconian.


Can we then claim for expenses like equipment, medical, insurances etc?
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Cohiba »

Q. wrote:
morell wrote:
Yank Man wrote:
morell wrote:
Player apathy
Work/Sport Quandary
Competition from other sports
Time poor lifestyles
Geography
Demographics
Club density

etc

It's a complicated story.



A-get used the the points system, the majority are in favour and it's here to stay. Yes I believe there should be more flexibility with it, maybe that will come in time.
B-get used to player payments it's here for good, times changed years ago. Smart clubs work a way to compete without throwing big $$$$ around. Be it right or wrong it ain't changing. :)
I've racked my feeble mind on how to get rid of player payments (for lower divisions in particular) as I think it's having a massive derogatory impact on our sport and league. The only solutions I've ever thought of either require a massive shift in the mindset of the league, sport and its players, or a massive influx of resources to monitor and police it...or support from the state and feds:

If player x is getting income from playing sport, that should be taxed, unless I am mistaken.

Therefore, technically, players that receive said income could be audited and fined by the ATO.

If this happened enough times eventually individuals and clubs would have to begin declaring their payments.

If that then happened for long enough, then there would be records available for, say, an office of Recreation and Sport to begin putting a stamp on it, and possibly, providing some of those records to approved governing bodies, such as the SAAFL.

From there, they could put in policies and regulation to control it.

Pipe dream and perhaps draconian.


Can we then claim for expenses like equipment, medical, insurances etc?


Of course.......also Work Cover for injuries sustained at the "office"..... :roll: :)
easy TIGA
Under 16s
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 11:09 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 35 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by easy TIGA »

Cohiba wrote:
easy TIGA wrote:Has the points system had a negative effect on grass roots football? Is it more of a coincidence that when this came in, it made college sides stronger and the less aussie rules populated area weaker?


Is that why you "deserted" a sinking ship....or was it just for the money........ :roll:


While it's none of your business. I gave the chics my all when I was there and family was my reasoning as to why I left to a club I live 2 minutes away from. I wasn't blaming points system on kilburns down fall. Simply asking what people thought. But thanks for the personal attack.
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Cohiba »

easy TIGA wrote:
Cohiba wrote:
easy TIGA wrote:Has the points system had a negative effect on grass roots football? Is it more of a coincidence that when this came in, it made college sides stronger and the less aussie rules populated area weaker?


Is that why you "deserted" a sinking ship....or was it just for the money........ :roll:


While it's none of your business. I gave the chics my all when I was there and family was my reasoning as to why I left to a club I live 2 minutes away from. I wasn't blaming points system on kilburns down fall. Simply asking what people thought. But thanks for the personal attack.


PG bailed me up on my post and copped for it being a smart alec remark.... it was crass and offer my apologies......and have removed the post.
User avatar
Tony Clifton
League - Top 5
Posts: 2804
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:00 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Carlton
Team: Adelaide University
Has thanked: 1492 times
Been thanked: 255 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Tony Clifton »

Look Good In Leather wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:
In 2013 Pulteney had 534 boys enrolled
CBC 1135
Trinity 1842
Blackfriars 1005
Mercedes 591

Whilst it is not instant, that is going to make a huge difference to the average district club that may have 100-200 players in their junior ranks in a season.

In 5-10 years time, these will be power clubs unless they don't capitalise on it. Likewise clubs like Henley, TTG, Modbury, PNU and Golden Grove should be very strong.

How many of those kids play football though? Those schools would only have a handful of football teams. Certainly less than a mid-sized football club.

Plus any of those kids who are decent at football would be playing junior club footy for someone else. Not all of them gravitate to their old scholars team.

They've had kids at their school for umpteen years and aren't powerhouses.
This is Tony Clifton! A name to respect! A name to fear!
Yank Man
League - Top 5
Posts: 2912
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:15 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Richmond
Team: Edwardstown
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 327 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Yank Man »

Mr Beefy wrote:Incorrect 2 and 0 and 2



Div 2 reserves players attract 2 points each under CFL regs for 2013. ;)
User avatar
FOURTH ESTATE
Veteran
Posts: 3686
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:08 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Richmond
Team: Broadview
Location: Front Row in the "Black Hole" of Allegiant Stadium
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 135 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by FOURTH ESTATE »

If they leave the league and if these country league apply the pts to those players. Country clubs not in favour of this one from memory.
2017, 2019 & 2020 PREMIERS
RICHMOND, RICHMOND, RICHMOND.


Let that be a lesson to you, Port Adelaide Sturt. & Norwood You don't beat Glenelg in Grand Finals and get away with it.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by heater31 »

Cohiba wrote:
Q. wrote:
morell wrote:
Yank Man wrote:[quote="morell"]

Player apathy
Work/Sport Quandary
Competition from other sports
Time poor lifestyles
Geography
Demographics
Club density

etc

It's a complicated story.



A-get used the the points system, the majority are in favour and it's here to stay. Yes I believe there should be more flexibility with it, maybe that will come in time.
B-get used to player payments it's here for good, times changed years ago. Smart clubs work a way to compete without throwing big $$$$ around. Be it right or wrong it ain't changing. :)
I've racked my feeble mind on how to get rid of player payments (for lower divisions in particular) as I think it's having a massive derogatory impact on our sport and league. The only solutions I've ever thought of either require a massive shift in the mindset of the league, sport and its players, or a massive influx of resources to monitor and police it...or support from the state and feds:

If player x is getting income from playing sport, that should be taxed, unless I am mistaken.

Therefore, technically, players that receive said income could be audited and fined by the ATO.

If this happened enough times eventually individuals and clubs would have to begin declaring their payments.

If that then happened for long enough, then there would be records available for, say, an office of Recreation and Sport to begin putting a stamp on it, and possibly, providing some of those records to approved governing bodies, such as the SAAFL.

From there, they could put in policies and regulation to control it.

Pipe dream and perhaps draconian.


Can we then claim for expenses like equipment, medical, insurances etc?


Of course.......also Work Cover for injuries sustained at the "office"..... :roll: :)[/quote]

With the supposed figures of player payments it could be argued that it is not a hobby anymore. SANFL players are taxed like a 2nd job, including the reserves players that are paid peanuts!

Filling out mountains of work cover paper work should also put a stop to clubs throwing cash about Willy billy...
Bombers4EVA
League - Best 21
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:05 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 89 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Bombers4EVA »

Yesterday arvo on Triple M. Ditts and Roo were discussing about Kilburn again and the word going around is that they are going to play in Div 3 in the next round. But if they cant get players then they could be looking at folding. Did anyone else here the conversation yesterday around 4:30pm?
Yank Man
League - Top 5
Posts: 2912
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:15 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Richmond
Team: Edwardstown
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 327 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Yank Man »

Interesting that round 3 saw 19 games throughout the league decided by between 104pts and 436, with 7 of them A grade clubs. Seems like more than the obvious are struggling particularly with depth. :(
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Cohiba »

Yank Man wrote:Interesting that round 3 saw 19 games throughout the league decided by between 104pts and 436, with 7 of them A grade clubs. Seems like more than the obvious are struggling particularly with depth. :(


It's been cooked and done before but on Yank's stats..... and history would suggest....... a merge for some of these Clubs would preserve proud traditions and this at least would be a better outcome than seeing"pride before a fall" result as a sad end to a Club and it's supporters.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Q. »

We're being slightly alarmist. Yes, a couple of those margins are effin huge, but it's always been a case that the bottom teams get pumped by the top teams.
User avatar
bickle
Under 16s
Posts: 487
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:45 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Always In Front
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by bickle »

....
Last edited by bickle on Sun Apr 27, 2014 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bickle
Under 16s
Posts: 487
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:45 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Always In Front
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by bickle »

bickle wrote:yeah there seems to be a "have" V's a "have's not" going around more than usual this year.
money is an issue with some clubs having more money than sense then there's the have more cents than money.
but I would say there's other issues that effect clubs, players not committed to play at the highest level the club is in, not experienced enough committees, lack of volunteers to do the unrewarded stuff that happens in the back ground & the big one creating the right culture for your club. some clubs will have to take a hit to get that culture right.
I know Angle Vale have lost a few players but there has been about 10-12 clearances with the other 30 not playing cause of work, family, just about to start one or fear of getting injured. we've seen this with 10 regular A grade starters missing from the first 3 rounds of the season due to work or slight injuries. no depth.
maybe this is the leveller year that shapes what's to come in the next few years with clubs going on or slowly getting buried against the so called bigger clubs.
whatever happens we'll still have a local game of footy to go see even though you might not really support that club.
have heard the SAAFL are brain storming about how to fix mass exits from clubs to keep them viable. you never know they might re float the idea they had a few years ago of north, south east & west divisions, or whatever they were going to call it.
from what I've heard around the traps this is an issue with the SAAFL.
will have to wait & see their proposal on this problem, if there is in fact a problem.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:56 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by morell »

Q. wrote:We're being slightly alarmist. Yes, a couple of those margins are effin huge, but it's always been a case that the bottom teams get pumped by the top teams.

Agree, but it's usually 20 goal margins, not 30, 40 and 50. Also, the sheer number of clubs copping these margins is unprecedented in my time.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Q. »

What's unprecedented is the whinging. Two years ago you just copped it on the chin and rebuilt the next year.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by bennymacca »

Q. wrote:We're being slightly alarmist. Yes, a couple of those margins are effin huge, but it's always been a case that the bottom teams get pumped by the top teams.


any more than a 20 goal thrashing is too much. and definitely shouldnt happen in a competition that has divisions designed to eliminate that.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: Clubs in strife

Post by Q. »

It's not designed to eliminate it, it's designed to give clubs a chance at rebuilding in the following year by playing at a slightly lower standard.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests