Squids wrote:Wouldn't be surprised. Its going to get nasty when Dank and Robinson take everyone down with them.
Dank perhaps but not Robinson. I believe Robinson has only been stood aside until the investigations are over, if he is found innocent I think you will find he we still do some work for the club just with a bit less control
Nothing but he isnt compelled to give evidence. Same as Dank. ASADA has already stated that because Dank is not currently employed in a club he is not compelled either, they obviously would like him to but by law he cant be forced. I think it would be wise for Dank and McVeigh to have their say.
Nothing but he isnt compelled to give evidence. Same as Dank. ASADA has already stated that because Dank is not currently employed in a club he is not compelled either, they obviously would like him to but by law he cant be forced. I think it would be wise for Dank and McVeigh to have their say.
if he doesn't though he would then get a automatic ban.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
Nothing but he isnt compelled to give evidence. Same as Dank. ASADA has already stated that because Dank is not currently employed in a club he is not compelled either, they obviously would like him to but by law he cant be forced. I think it would be wise for Dank and McVeigh to have their say.
if he doesn't though he would then get a automatic ban.
Banned from what, dont think he has any intention of working with sport again.
Nothing but he isnt compelled to give evidence. Same as Dank. ASADA has already stated that because Dank is not currently employed in a club he is not compelled either, they obviously would like him to but by law he cant be forced. I think it would be wise for Dank and McVeigh to have their say.
if he doesn't though he would then get a automatic ban.
Banned from what, dont think he has any intention of working with sport again.
don't think his intention matters, as I couldn't imagine anyone dumb enough to employ him. If there is evidence that he has done something wrong and doesn't front to ASADA they will give him a automatic ban.
I don't know how ASADA told the player they would be right when shane charter gave evidence today on what they where taking and how they got pass ASADA testing.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit wrote:I don't know how ASADA told the player they would be right when shane charter gave evidence today on what they where taking and how they got pass ASADA testing.
He only knows what Dank was given. Not what Essendon footballers were given. Credible witness too. Any other ex cons giving evidence?
helicopterking wrote:Didn't Shane Warne get banned for taking a supplement for weight loss? Game into disrepute (similar to Ben Cousins) should be the minimum punishment
And I think thats what will happen $1m fine and loss of draft picks for 2 years
helicopterking wrote:Didn't Shane Warne get banned for taking a supplement for weight loss? Game into disrepute (similar to Ben Cousins) should be the minimum punishment
And I think thats what will happen $1m fine and loss of draft picks for 2 years
helicopterking wrote:Didn't Shane Warne get banned for taking a supplement for weight loss? Game into disrepute (similar to Ben Cousins) should be the minimum punishment
And I think thats what will happen $1m fine and loss of draft picks for 2 years
Plus a few officials sacked??
1 already has (Hamilton) 1 will soon (Corcoran) 1 potentially (Robson) David Evans has brought the election forward 2 years and he could be voted out but like myself I think most members will vote him back in
kickinit wrote:I don't know how ASADA told the player they would be right when shane charter gave evidence today on what they where taking and how they got pass ASADA testing.
He only knows what Dank was given. Not what Essendon footballers were given. Credible witness too. Any other ex cons giving evidence?
if he has rock hard evidence text emails what does being a ex con have to do with it? actually it makes essendon look pretty bad doing dealings with a ex con. I think essendon would be hoping that dank doesn't speak to asada, i'm sure he's the one with all the evidence to bring them down.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
helicopterking wrote:Didn't Shane Warne get banned for taking a supplement for weight loss? Game into disrepute (similar to Ben Cousins) should be the minimum punishment
And I think thats what will happen $1m fine and loss of draft picks for 2 years
both of those players where banned from the game. If it is found that the players have been doping then they will have no choice but to ban them from playing.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit wrote:I don't know how ASADA told the player they would be right when shane charter gave evidence today on what they where taking and how they got pass ASADA testing.
He only knows what Dank was given. Not what Essendon footballers were given. Credible witness too. Any other ex cons giving evidence?
if he has rock hard evidence text emails what does being a ex con have to do with it? actually it makes essendon look pretty bad doing dealings with a ex con. I think essendon would be hoping that dank doesn't speak to asada, i'm sure he's the one with all the evidence to bring them down.
Essendon didn't deal with Charter. Dank had dealings with Charter. Being an ex con says he is an unreliable person. Sorry I'm not buying into all the speculation, just going on what facts are out there.