marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Can you sweeten the deal with Dean Gore
marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
LMA wrote:marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Can you sweeten the deal with Dean Gore
marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
MW wrote:marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Done
marbles wrote:MW wrote:marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Done
But then you got the old pavlich or mcgregor question with lukosius or rankine question
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:marbles wrote:MW wrote:marbles wrote:mcgovern and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Or mcgovern, cheney and ellis_yolmen for pick one
Done
But then you got the old pavlich or mcgregor question with lukosius or rankine question
If this deal went out though we could get both. Rankine will slip down the draft IMO
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:Jim05 wrote:Saints cut two more. Hugh Goddard and Nathan Wright
Get Hugh Goddard to a decent club and he will become a 200 gamer. Kid can play
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
MW wrote:Andrew Jarman eluded to that last night. Reckons footy is just not his passion.
Would probably be more passionate if he wasn't treated like a robot, where GPS stats mean more than ability to hit targetswoodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:Andrew Jarman eluded to that last night. Reckons footy is just not his passion.
do you think he'd be more passionate if he was good enough????
i wanna stress, to be even considered by an AFL side you are pretty darn good, just in comparison to the rest of the comp
Lightning McQueen wrote:Dutchy wrote:Brodlach wrote:A good player shines in a shit team. Look at Cripps
Look at Rockliff also
Rockliff will be better next season.
woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:Andrew Jarman eluded to that last night. Reckons footy is just not his passion.
do you think he'd be more passionate if he was good enough????
i wanna stress, to be even considered by an AFL side you are pretty darn good, just in comparison to the rest of the comp
MW wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:Andrew Jarman eluded to that last night. Reckons footy is just not his passion.
do you think he'd be more passionate if he was good enough????
i wanna stress, to be even considered by an AFL side you are pretty darn good, just in comparison to the rest of the comp
Better players than him have retired early.
Maybe he thought he had to play considering his Dad and uncle.
Who knows. Just not good enough physically and mentally.
Corona Man wrote:MW wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:Andrew Jarman eluded to that last night. Reckons footy is just not his passion.
do you think he'd be more passionate if he was good enough????
i wanna stress, to be even considered by an AFL side you are pretty darn good, just in comparison to the rest of the comp
Better players than him have retired early.
Maybe he thought he had to play considering his Dad and uncle.
Who knows. Just not good enough physically and mentally.
Saw him playing as a 17 y/o at North. Skills looked ok, I just thought he had a very small body. The only way to get away being that size in the AFL, was to be quick. He wasn't.
marbles wrote:
Ben Jarman has retired.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests