Round 10 Port v West

bertiebeatle1 · Post by **bertiebeatle1** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:41 pm

Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again

MJP1993 · Post by **MJP1993** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:51 pm

bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again

From what I’ve seen online Port fans are up in arms some claiming on Facebook they’ll be happy they’ll leave the SANFL
So funny to read

bertiebeatle1 · Post by **bertiebeatle1** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:05 pm

MJP1993 wrote:
bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again
From what I’ve seen online Port fans are up in arms some claiming on Facebook they’ll be happy they’ll leave the SANFL
So funny to read

And what has that got to do with what I posted?

UK Fan · Post by **UK Fan** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:38 pm

I saw a different angle tonight and it looked like a clash of heads. Dixon goes down holding his head after the incident.

Totally unintentional and wouldn’t of been looked at x-amount of years ago

MW · Post by MW » Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:50 pm

MJP1993 wrote:
bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again
From what I’ve seen online Port fans are up in arms some claiming on Facebook they’ll be happy they’ll leave the SANFL
So funny to read

Port dont want the SANFL, SANFL fans dont want Port in SANFL. Seems only SANFL want Port in SANFL.

Post by **Wedgie** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:19 pm

The Power are contesting the Dixon decision.

dedja · Post by **dedja** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:21 pm

Wedgie wrote:The Power are contesting the Dixon decision.

Really don’t have much to lose so might as well.

MW · Post by MW » Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:23 pm

UK Fan wrote:I saw a different angle tonight and it looked like a clash of heads. Dixon goes down holding his head after the incident.

Totally unintentional and wouldn’t of been looked at x-amount of years ago

Yeah saw the same footage tonight and thats what it is, still choose to bump and I think that's what they pinch them on now
Not ideal but its here to stay.

dedja · Post by **dedja** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:24 pm

UK Fan wrote:I saw a different angle tonight and it looked like a clash of heads. Dixon goes down holding his head after the incident.

Totally unintentional and wouldn’t of been looked at x-amount of years ago

Where was that?

UK Fan · Post by **UK Fan** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:54 pm

dedja wrote:
UK Fan wrote:I saw a different angle tonight and it looked like a clash of heads. Dixon goes down holding his head after the incident.

Totally unintentional and wouldn’t of been looked at x-amount of years ago
Where was that?

One of the local news outlets I can’t recall which one.

Unintentional now equals reckless unfortunately for Charlie.

I understand the power challenging tbh. 3 weeks seems a tad harsh.

If you look at the footage on sanfl.com you can see Dixon go down after the hit.

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 8:55 pm

Contact high outcome severe (concussion) based on the injury report so it’s three weeks minimum

Feel for the SANFL anything less than three weeks based on the National Tribunal guidelines and they stand accused of favouring the AFL sides. Follow the guidelines and Port fans will claim the SANFZl is out to get them.

dedja · Post by **dedja** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 8:58 pm

am Bays wrote:Contact high outcome severe (concussion) based on the injury report so it’s three weeks minimum

Feel for the SANFL anything less than three weeks based on the National Tribunal guidelines and they stand accused of favouring the AFL sides. Follow the guidelines and Port fans will claim the SANFZl is out to get them.

Stick the Laws of the Game up your arse … together with your whistle!

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 9:02 pm

Maybe Port can dust off the Frampton brief and claim the sun was in
Dixon’s eyes???

http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic. ... &start=280

dedja · Post by **dedja** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 9:06 pm

am Bays wrote:Maybe Port can dust off the Frampton brief and claim the sun was in
Dixon’s eyes???

http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic. ... &start=280

whybother · Post by **whybother** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 9:45 pm

Where's Koch when you need him? SANFL is soooo different than AFL. More to whine about.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Mon Jun 17, 2024 9:58 pm

bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again

A bit like your spelling…

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Tue Jun 18, 2024 8:29 am

am Bays wrote:Maybe Port can dust off the Frampton brief and claim the sun was in
Dixon’s eyes???

http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic. ... &start=280

Port Power could use Frampton about now also

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Jun 18, 2024 8:36 am

whybother wrote:Where's Koch when you need him? SANFL is soooo different than AFL. More to whine about.

Nothing like a whine about a whiner.

bertiebeatle1 · Post by **bertiebeatle1** » Tue Jun 18, 2024 11:04 am

Spargo wrote:
bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again
A bit like your spelling…

Thanks mum

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Tue Jun 18, 2024 11:21 am

bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again

How?

Based on these https://sanfl-content.imgix.net/content ... L_2024.pdf

it's been graded the lowest possible conduct (careless) the outcome is severe based on the concussion - White will miss at least two games the only possible room for manoeuvre for Port is, is the contact high (four weeks) or three (body) - p 22 of the linked document.

Yep in the past this would've been included in a 2020's version of MMM Rockin' Footy DVD as one of those incidents we all loved 10 years ago but as we all know the our sport takes concussion much more seriously hence why we get this outcome (match review sanction) when players choose to bump.

As your most decorated Port Power player Kane Cornes (4 x BFs 1 x premiership) said on SEN breakfast on Monday - the bump is dead

PS these guidelines would apply if you were in the VFL competition, just quietly

Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Who is online