Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
JK wrote:Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
I would doubt the first and think the second part simply wouldn't happen.
JK wrote:Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
Interesting isnt it... surely not though, how are they going to recoup the payouts for Watson winning it?
2020 AFL Premiers: Richmond 12.9.81 def Geelong 7.8.50
2019 AFL Premiers: Richmond 17.12.114 def Greater Western Sydney 3.7.25
2017 AFL Premiers: Adelaide 8.12.60 def by Richmond 16.12.108
2012 D5 Premiers: Brahma Lodge 24.15.159 def Hope Valley 7.13.55
Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019 Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
interesting to read that Andy D doesnt like sports scientists etc, surely for the good of AUSTRALIA we need him to take over Cricket Australia to cut out the rotation policy
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
what happens to the salary cap?
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
JK wrote:Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
I would doubt the first and think the second part simply wouldn't happen.
Bookies are bookies, you know?
just like horse racing, they pay out on the result on the day. when horses return positive swabs the TAB or bookies dont go back and then payout on the new result
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
They dont have enough listed players to take out 25 and promote the rest to the senior side
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
That would be the fairest thing for the rest of Australia but we know the AFL doesnt care about any other level of football. Think it goes with out saying that Essendon would be playing for no points for 2 years, basically they only play to fulfill the Tv rights deal
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019 Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
Last year, says ASADA's register, three Queensland amateur rugby players were caught in possession of, using and/or trafficking peptide, and suspended for two to four years.
ASADA makes no allowance for the unsuspecting. ''Athletes are responsible for any substance found in their body,'' said an addendum to a release last year. ''There have been cases where … athletes have been sanctioned after they have used supplements that they thought were OK, but which were actually contaminated with prohibited substances.'
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
They dont have enough listed players to take out 25 and promote the rest to the senior side
would have thought AFL aligned VFL clubs would have to have at least squads of 30. Are First team VFL sides still limited to a max of 14 AFL players on Match day? still need to find 8 players for that and then fill a reserves team and allow for injuries.
Last year, says ASADA's register, three Queensland amateur rugby players were caught in possession of, using and/or trafficking peptide, and suspended for two to four years.
ASADA makes no allowance for the unsuspecting. ''Athletes are responsible for any substance found in their body,'' said an addendum to a release last year. ''There have been cases where … athletes have been sanctioned after they have used supplements that they thought were OK, but which were actually contaminated with prohibited substances.'
In SA in State level Golf Tournaments it states on the Entry form that you could be tested for PED's. I one have entered the past couple of years half the field would be out because they failed the breath test.....
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches. These 2 things are set in stone. Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season? How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc? If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
there would be a out clause in the contract. Would happen if a team had a heap of injuries and suspension that they couldn't fill a side for the week. then again we are talking about the AFL so there probably stupid enough to not have it.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
Im sure they could find 25 players who were around the draft this year or in previous years who would play for petrol money to play AFL and enhance their chance of being recruited in coming years.