Gozu wrote:Stop the boats! See ya Tone.
Death of the National Party? Some Libs are already blaming the Nats for this.



by fisho mcspaz » Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:56 pm
Gozu wrote:Stop the boats! See ya Tone.
Death of the National Party? Some Libs are already blaming the Nats for this.
by redden whites » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:17 pm
by Tassie Blues » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:29 pm
by Sojourner » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:42 pm
by Tassie Blues » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:53 pm
Sojourner wrote:I suspect we will have three years of a government that wont pass any major legislation at all because its all to hard
by Media Park » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:58 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Q. » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:35 pm
by redden whites » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:39 pm
am Bays wrote:surely he'll knock back the speakers gong Julia has offered him...
by redden whites » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:46 pm
by fish » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:55 pm
Sojourner wrote:I suspect we will have three years of a government that wont pass any major legislation at all because its all to hard, and what will get passed will have to have various slings made to get it voted through...
by Interceptor » Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:01 pm
by Sojourner » Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:20 pm
fish wrote:Sojourner wrote:I suspect we will have three years of a government that wont pass any major legislation at all because its all to hard, and what will get passed will have to have various slings made to get it voted through...
Yeah I've been thinking the same thing Sojourner. Having said that it looks like the broadband network will keep rolling out at the very least.
by Squawk » Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:42 pm
by Q. » Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:37 pm
Squawk wrote:The worst outcome of this is the election commitment to fund a $2bn rail line in Sydney's west, from the budget after the next election.
by Leaping Lindner » Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:41 am
Media Park wrote:I may be completely wrong, but I think the swing the Coalition got this election, despite not being able to form government, means this is just a stay of execution, and with a lacklustre 3 years ahead, the Coalition will be in power in the next election...
Big question is whom will lead them...
by Gozu » Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:18 am
Leaping Lindner wrote:Media Park wrote:I may be completely wrong, but I think the swing the Coalition got this election, despite not being able to form government, means this is just a stay of execution, and with a lacklustre 3 years ahead, the Coalition will be in power in the next election...
Big question is whom will lead them...
Past State results would indicate your wrong. Beattie, Rann, Bracks and Carr all held sway over minority governments at various points but then increased their vote the next election.
by Magpiespower » Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:40 am
Gozu wrote:Some Libs are already blaming the Nats for this.
by Psyber » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:51 am
Really? I'm expecting the return of Paul Keating's "Stagflation" once interest rates start to rise.Quichey wrote:Given the strength of the economy and it's growth expected to continue, the box seat is one of incumbency. Not a great time to be in opposition.
by Media Park » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:38 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by JohnnyG » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:44 am
Interceptor wrote:Overall a case of the federal government following the states with mediocre Labor governments getting in due to weak opposition.
Great, 3 more years of the world's worst communications minister (Conroy).
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |