dedja wrote:OK, we've go the 'legs in play now in this thread ... where's the segue to Central?
Gowans = Thugs
by cennals05 » Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:51 pm
dedja wrote:OK, we've go the 'legs in play now in this thread ... where's the segue to Central?
by MAY-Z » Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:52 pm
cennals05 wrote:dedja wrote:OK, we've go the 'legs in play now in this thread ... where's the segue to Central?
Gowans = Thugs
by SANFLnut » Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:16 am
Grahaml wrote:Why would you issue a "please explain" to someone in such circumstances? There's no evidence either Kirk or Cubillo were even involved! If they came back and simply said they didn't know anything, what would (or could) the league do? Suspend them for not knowing anything despite some fans claiming they should?
This whole thread long ago became a massive joke, sadly though it's getting worse. There's no evidence from anywhere at all do proceed with.
As for avoiding future incidents without witnesses, the only option is to add cameras to pick up the whole ground. No you can't simply tell the umpires to watch more closely because there are 9 umpires on the ground I believe, how many do you want to be watching the play? If none of the 17 teammates these guys had on the ground saw it, seems a bit rich to expect the umpires to.
by am Bays » Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:51 am
by Grahaml » Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:39 am
SANFLnut wrote:Grahaml wrote:Why would you issue a "please explain" to someone in such circumstances? There's no evidence either Kirk or Cubillo were even involved! If they came back and simply said they didn't know anything, what would (or could) the league do? Suspend them for not knowing anything despite some fans claiming they should?
This whole thread long ago became a massive joke, sadly though it's getting worse. There's no evidence from anywhere at all do proceed with.
As for avoiding future incidents without witnesses, the only option is to add cameras to pick up the whole ground. No you can't simply tell the umpires to watch more closely because there are 9 umpires on the ground I believe, how many do you want to be watching the play? If none of the 17 teammates these guys had on the ground saw it, seems a bit rich to expect the umpires to.
There is video that suggests Kirk was right near Wundke just before he hit the deck, that is enough grounds to ask him what he saw, heard, thought happened etc. The option of having an SANFL employee attend Monday night training and spend an hour asking questions a couple of times a year is significantly cheaper than setting up behind the goals cameras at four grounds every round.
I do think in the three umpire system that the non controlling umpire who is inside 50 should position himself so that he can see the players in his area of the ground rather than just watch the ball. The players must all watch the ball. My role as a spectator is to watch the game, his is to do what ever is necessary to make the game run properly. If that means not watching the ball then too bad. My suggestion though was that the umpires observer in the grandstand could make a note of incidents in the game that may need reviewing or investigating.
How do you know none of the players on the ground saw what happened if noone has asked them? If Tambling was the nearest Sturt player, has anyone asked him what he knows?
I don't accept that the correct response to fairly serious injuries (even if short lasting) that involve a player being stretchered off is "the TV coverage did not show anything so we will just pretend it did not happen" it damages our competition and that is my concern.
by stampy » Thu Aug 18, 2011 3:24 pm
am Bays wrote:Oh FFS!!!! Just when you thought this thread was almost going to slide down to page two of the SANFL board
Your thoughts about Cubillo being close to Neale and the commentators referring immediately to Neale going down as a result of an incident with Cubillo, or do you just want to continue this four day witch hunt on Kirky???
Took Cross and Meaney et al. almost a minute to finger Kirky and then only after Sturt players started to remonstrate with him.
Your concern for the 2nd smallest player on the field is well and truly noted.
Your not the nut in the SANFL who only thought to write a press releases on the Wundke incident are you???
by SANFLnut » Thu Aug 18, 2011 3:51 pm
am Bays wrote:Oh FFS!!!! Just when you thought this thread was almost going to slide down to page two of the SANFL board
Your thoughts about Cubillo being close to Neale and the commentators referring immediately to Neale going down as a result of an incident with Cubillo, or do you just want to continue this four day witch hunt on Kirky???
Took Cross and Meaney et al. almost a minute to finger Kirky and then only after Sturt players started to remonstrate with him.
Your concern for the 2nd smallest player on the field is well and truly noted.
Your not the nut in the SANFL who only thought to write a press releases on the Wundke incident are you???
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:53 pm
stampy wrote:am Bays wrote:Oh FFS!!!! Just when you thought this thread was almost going to slide down to page two of the SANFL board
Your thoughts about Cubillo being close to Neale and the commentators referring immediately to Neale going down as a result of an incident with Cubillo, or do you just want to continue this four day witch hunt on Kirky???
Took Cross and Meaney et al. almost a minute to finger Kirky and then only after Sturt players started to remonstrate with him.
Your concern for the 2nd smallest player on the field is well and truly noted.
Your not the nut in the SANFL who only thought to write a press releases on the Wundke incident are you???
thats what **** me off the most is that neales hit more than 50 metres behind the play has almost been ignored, the kid had xrays for a broken jaw yet no one gives a flying daffy
by stampy » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:06 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:I thought he knew![]()
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:15 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:33 pm
by fish » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:36 pm
Snouts bar?bulldogproud2 wrote:I think that the grassy knoll was transferred from Dallas to Glenelg for this match. Was there a repository building nearby?
by HOORAY PUNT » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:50 pm
stampy wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:I thought he knew![]()
does somebody need a hug yorrick?
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:50 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:52 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:so I guess he doesn't have a broken jaw?
by stampy » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:04 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:stampy wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:I thought he knew![]()
does somebody need a hug yorrick?
Nah ,just waiting patiently for your eveidence . I think you may have been hugging something yourself though.
Good onya Stampy , you are gold mate. Toodlepip !
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:08 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:09 pm
stampy wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:stampy wrote:oh and can someone tell cubillo that neale's jaw isnt broken, people in glass houses
Oh ,what hapenned ? Did you actually see it ?
yeah so stuyfa!!
by stampy » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:23 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Maybe it was a magic jaw then
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |