by Booney » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:29 am
by once_were_warriors » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:35 am
by FlyingHigh » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:42 am
by smac » Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:10 pm
Booney wrote:You said Laird wouldn't accept the Gowans' doing anything by half.
by Aerie » Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:23 pm
smac wrote:Booney wrote:Interesting that the club has allowed this, IMO it sets a dangerous precedence for future negotiations with players.
Not really. Simply say to anyone requesting such an arrangement: "Are you McKenzie? Have you done all he has to earn this arrangement?"
End of conversation as there are only one or two players at each SANFL club to have done what McKenzie has at the Eagles.
by MagareyLegend » Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:26 pm
by bloods08 » Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:32 pm
MagareyLegend wrote:I think several SANFL clubs erred (without naming them) in not offering Macca their senior coaching position as a playing coach with a suitable mentor. But that's just me obviously Glenelg, West and Sturt (whoops) saw it differently.
by nickname » Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:29 pm
MagareyLegend wrote:I think several SANFL clubs erred (without naming them) in not offering Macca their senior coaching position as a playing coach with a suitable mentor. But that's just me obviously Glenelg, West and Sturt (whoops) saw it differently.
by am Bays » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:04 pm
MagareyLegend wrote:I think several SANFL clubs erred (without naming them) in not offering Macca their senior coaching position as a playing coach with a suitable mentor. But that's just me obviously Glenelg, West and Sturt (whoops) saw it differently.
by The Brad » Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:12 am
by FlyingHigh » Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:16 am
MagareyLegend wrote:I think several SANFL clubs erred (without naming them) in not offering Macca their senior coaching position as a playing coach with a suitable mentor. But that's just me obviously Glenelg, West and Sturt (whoops) saw it differently.
by Big Phil » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:36 am
The Brad wrote:Seems both North and Norwood are chasing for Sydney Swans midfielder Paul Bevan signature.
by on the rails » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:36 am
The Brad wrote:Seems both North and Norwood are chasing for Sydney Swans midfielder Paul Bevan signature.
by Big Phil » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:43 am
on the rails wrote:The Brad wrote:Seems both North and Norwood are chasing for Sydney Swans midfielder Paul Bevan signature.
My mail is Legs odds on to beat North due to the ex Swan factors in Doyle and Davis not to mention Nick Fosdike as well and his ties with Norwood.
by JK » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:46 am
The Brad wrote:Seems both North and Norwood are chasing for Sydney Swans midfielder Paul Bevan signature.
by on the rails » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:06 pm
JK wrote:The Brad wrote:Seems both North and Norwood are chasing for Sydney Swans midfielder Paul Bevan signature.
Port are/were in that mix also
by JK » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:09 pm
on the rails wrote:JK wrote:The Brad wrote:Seems both North and Norwood are chasing for Sydney Swans midfielder Paul Bevan signature.
Port are/were in that mix also
Apparently he is best mates with Meiklejohn so Magpies are big chance to sign him by all accounts.
by SDK » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:32 pm
by Big Phil » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:33 pm
SDK wrote:Except the Mapies can not afford to pay him.
by Booney » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:44 pm
Big Phil wrote:SDK wrote:Except the Mapies can not afford to pay him.
Why's that?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |