SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Who will make the Grand Final?

Adelaide University
7
3%
Blackfriars OS
16
7%
Central United
14
6%
Colonel Light Gardens
13
6%
Houghton
7
3%
Ingle Farm
12
5%
Lockleys
18
8%
Mawson Lakes
39
17%
Trinity OS
20
9%
Woodville South
84
37%
 
Total votes : 230

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby zedman » Tue May 29, 2012 4:51 pm

cheers BFG..its all coming back to me now..
zedman
Coach
 
Posts: 6465
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:48 pm
Has liked: 1089 times
Been liked: 387 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Cash 123 » Tue May 29, 2012 4:53 pm

Gatt_Weasel wrote:
scottroo wrote:A good player yes but defenders in div one would cut him up, plus he would be 35 now yes?



lol if he is 35 he wouldn't have any speed left them legs would be shot


bit like you old Gatt, maybe you should join him in Div 6
Cash 123
Under 18s
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:28 am
Location: Apollo 13
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 22 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 4:56 pm

Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.

People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side and be a solid contributor.
Last edited by morell on Tue May 29, 2012 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby MIGHTY BULLS » Tue May 29, 2012 4:57 pm

Cash 123 wrote:
Gatt_Weasel wrote:
scottroo wrote:A good player yes but defenders in div one would cut him up, plus he would be 35 now yes?



lol if he is 35 he wouldn't have any speed left them legs would be shot


bit like you old Gatt, maybe you should join him in Div 6


Cant be talking like that about the bullet train Gatt Weasel
User avatar
MIGHTY BULLS
Member
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:10 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Cash 123 » Tue May 29, 2012 4:58 pm

morell wrote:Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.

People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side.


I think its fair to assume he may slot into a forward pocket but you are talking about 1 player. 95% or higher of the division wouldn't make a Div 1 Side
Cash 123
Under 18s
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:28 am
Location: Apollo 13
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 22 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:00 pm

Cash 123 wrote:
morell wrote:Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.

People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side.


I think its fair to assume he may slot into a forward pocket but you are talking about 1 player. 95% or higher of the division wouldn't make a Div 1 Side
I would say about 90%, but I agree with your principle.

EDIT: Just to calc that out, 21* 10 * 0.1 = 21 players in Div 6 capable of playing Div 1 footy or about 2-3 players per side.

What did that morell bloke say again?:

morell wrote:Each Div 6 side would have at least 2 or 3 players that could play in Division 1 with relative ease
Last edited by morell on Tue May 29, 2012 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 29, 2012 5:16 pm

Morrell, why does your player rating out of 10 go up to 12? Is that for special outstanding players like me? :lol: Am i a 12/10?!? :lol:
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:19 pm

haha, just forgot to remove that from the axis labels, my bad, but I think there is scope there to use those extra points for players lacking in ability but make up for it with looks and charm....

So no. You are not a 12/10.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 29, 2012 5:20 pm

morell wrote:You are a 1.2/10.

edited for accuracy :lol:
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby lutz » Tue May 29, 2012 5:30 pm

morell wrote:
Cash 123 wrote:
morell wrote:Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.

People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side.


I think its fair to assume he may slot into a forward pocket but you are talking about 1 player. 95% or higher of the division wouldn't make a Div 1 Side
I would say about 90%, but I agree with your principle.

EDIT: Just to calc that out, 21* 10 * 0.1 = 21 players in Div 6 capable of playing Div 1 footy or about 2-3 players per side.

What did that morell bloke say again?:

morell wrote:Each Div 6 side would have at least 2 or 3 players that could play in Division 1 with relative ease


A page or so back, you said that your side in D7 would have about 5 players that would walk into a D1 side. Maybe into an injury ravaged one resigned to relegation toward the end of the year. There are some good players in these grades sure, but very few could walk into a D1 or D2 side. Would take a bit of work in preseason I'd reckon. Even then, as someone else pointed out previously, a Gaza, Henley, or SPOC (etc) would have high quality in every position, and great depth...it would be hard to just walk into their club and take someone elses spot.
User avatar
lutz
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:35 pm
Location: Draper Train Station
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:49 pm

lutz wrote:A page or so back, you said that your side in D7 would have about 5 players that would walk into a D1 side.
Indeed, we have recruited very well and are going OK. 8)

MP players who could crack div 1, IMO:

Troy Pots
Luke McDonnell
Nat McDonnell
Michael Mazey
Steve Logan

Jarrad Daish at a stretch.

lutz wrote:Maybe into an injury ravaged one resigned to relegation toward the end of the year. There are some good players in these grades sure, but very few could walk into a D1 or D2 side.
I would suggest about 10%. About 1 or 2 from the mediocre sides and 3 or 4 from the good ones.

This is the thing people keep forgetting:

This. Has. Already. Occurred.

Players from Div 5, 6 and 7 have moved into Div 1 and 2 and performed exceedingly well. I will reiterate the main point again. The top few players in teams in the lower divisions are as good as any player you will find up and down the SAAFL. The predominate reason behind why clubs are in the lower grades is because of the lack of depth of talent, once you get past this first few it drops away quite quickly. If you cop an injury to a key player you're stuffed. The teams in the higher ups can cover losses, can cover form drops, can ensure every man on the ground is fit, motivated, has been at training, has done a pre-season etc.

lutz wrote:Would take a bit of work in preseason I'd reckon.
This I agree with.

lutz wrote:Even then, as someone else pointed out previously, a Gaza, Henley, or SPOC (etc) would have high quality in every position, and great depth...it would be hard to just walk into their club and take someone elses spot.
Hard, perhaps, but it could very easily happen.
Last edited by morell on Tue May 29, 2012 5:51 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Footy Follower » Tue May 29, 2012 5:50 pm

morell wrote:
scottroo wrote:Sorry morell the mcdonnells would full on struggle in div 1
You're full on crazy if you think Luke McDonnell couldn't slot into a Div 1 side tomorrow. I know of players, right now, playing Div 1, that are nowhere near as capable a footballer as Luke is.


At the end of the day you can only base it on what a player has actually done, not what he might :roll: have been or be capable of doing.
User avatar
Footy Follower
Under 16s
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:52 pm

OK, he has lead Happy Valley's goal kicking for a season.

That enough to prove to me he is capable of playing Div 1.

Enuf said.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 29, 2012 6:06 pm

For arguements sake.. what would be the point value of a player in Div 6 or 7 going to Div 1?

Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 6:54 pm

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Q. » Tue May 29, 2012 9:07 pm

BFG wrote:Houghton V lockleys will be a belter of a game up there. just out of interest how are your blokes travelling with injuries Q? would you say that your strongest side was the one we played R1?


Had a settled 21 for the first three rounds. Haven't had much luck with player availability since then, but the blokes picked have still got to get the job done and be prepared to work hard for wins.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Jetters » Tue May 29, 2012 9:40 pm

morell wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.


Why is it such a big deal that you need to convince everyone that MP and other low ranked sides have good players that could play higher?? No sh!t you have players who could play higher, every club does, they are called the 'good players', you also have stinking players who could play lower. How boring would football be if the best 210 players played D1, the next best 210 playeed D2 etc.

But in the end who cares, they play D7, not D1.

You do sound however like you have an over inflated view of the players at your club.
Jetters
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:31 pm
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 119 times
Grassroots Team: Unley

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby morell » Tue May 29, 2012 10:29 pm

Jetters wrote:
morell wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.


Why is it such a big deal that you need to convince everyone that MP and other low ranked sides have good players that could play higher?? No sh!t you have players who could play higher, every club does, they are called the 'good players', you also have stinking players who could play lower. How boring would football be if the best 210 players played D1, the next best 210 playeed D2 etc.
Exactly, thanks for agreeing. Please assist in explaining this principle to others and they have seemingly misunderstood my postings.

As for the veracity of my debate, only trying to match the ignorance demonstrated.

Jetters wrote:You do sound however like you have an over inflated view of the players at your club.
Not at all. You have apparently missed the part where I said we would have players that wouldn't get anywhere near a Div 1 R side playing A grade.

Ask Yank Man if he reckons I overrate Mitchell Park. If anything I go too far the other way. ;)
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2022 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby Footy Follower » Wed May 30, 2012 10:22 am

Jetters wrote:
morell wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.


Why is it such a big deal that you need to convince everyone that MP and other low ranked sides have good players that could play higher?? No sh!t you have players who could play higher, every club does, they are called the 'good players', you also have stinking players who could play lower. How boring would football be if the best 210 players played D1, the next best 210 playeed D2 etc.

But in the end who cares, they play D7, not D1.

You do sound however like you have an over inflated view of the players at your club.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Footy Follower
Under 16s
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: SAAFL Division 6 & D6R (2012)

Postby White Unicorn » Wed May 30, 2012 10:54 am

bloozebrother wrote:
The Riddler wrote:
bloozebrother wrote:Didnt sumner make the state side from division 5? I witnessed Div 1 football last year and i reckon just about every team in div 6 would beat alot of the div 1 reserves teams. SHOC's C grade in Div 7 were better than the B grade in Div 1 res who only lost 2 games all year - mainly cause alot of players didnt like playing under the coach. I have seen some great footy this year from some very good players in Div 6 and do you think Uni's C grade is full of C graders? I dont think so! Since the SANFL abolished the u/17 & u/19 system more young players just move on to the local clubs. Some developed later and that 2nd year of u/19's was enough to propel them onto bigger and better things. But that opportunity got removed thanks to one - B Phillips!

I knew it! :evil: :(

Went both ways riddler - the b grade coach couldnt identify the good players that flash had in his team. By finals time they had built a bond and werent going to split up. You faced a bloody good side in the granny - interesting that none of the premiership team have played Div 7 this year. The majority are playing A grade footy somewhere for a new club.


Mate, you have absolutely no clue. The B grade had better players than the C grade, dont know what ur on about. If you look at the B grade GF side, if you know so much, name me 1 player who didnt deserve to be in that B grade side? Sorry riddler, you did play SHOCs C grade in the GF.
Majority are playing A grade somewhere else? Try 2 blokes (zac ellis and sam marshall) who are playing somewhere else at kenilworth and clg. Dont make me state facts!
White Unicorn
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |