by zedman » Tue May 29, 2012 4:51 pm
by Cash 123 » Tue May 29, 2012 4:53 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:scottroo wrote:A good player yes but defenders in div one would cut him up, plus he would be 35 now yes?
lol if he is 35 he wouldn't have any speed left them legs would be shot
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 4:56 pm
by MIGHTY BULLS » Tue May 29, 2012 4:57 pm
Cash 123 wrote:Gatt_Weasel wrote:scottroo wrote:A good player yes but defenders in div one would cut him up, plus he would be 35 now yes?
lol if he is 35 he wouldn't have any speed left them legs would be shot
bit like you old Gatt, maybe you should join him in Div 6
by Cash 123 » Tue May 29, 2012 4:58 pm
morell wrote:Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.
People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side.
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:00 pm
I would say about 90%, but I agree with your principle.Cash 123 wrote:morell wrote:Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.
People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side.
I think its fair to assume he may slot into a forward pocket but you are talking about 1 player. 95% or higher of the division wouldn't make a Div 1 Side
morell wrote:Each Div 6 side would have at least 2 or 3 players that could play in Division 1 with relative ease
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 29, 2012 5:16 pm
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:19 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 29, 2012 5:20 pm
morell wrote:You are a 1.2/10.
by lutz » Tue May 29, 2012 5:30 pm
morell wrote:I would say about 90%, but I agree with your principle.Cash 123 wrote:morell wrote:Given the supply he would likely receive, it wouldn't matter if Steven Silvagni was on him, he will still be good for 2-3 goals a game, more than most forwards average. I think he he 31.
People also forget he was Happy Valley's leading goal kicker in 2008. Div 2 standard? If he can be an equivalent to a Div 2 clubs leading goal kicker I don't think it's unfair to assume he could slot into a forward pocket in a Div 1 side.
I think its fair to assume he may slot into a forward pocket but you are talking about 1 player. 95% or higher of the division wouldn't make a Div 1 Side
EDIT: Just to calc that out, 21* 10 * 0.1 = 21 players in Div 6 capable of playing Div 1 footy or about 2-3 players per side.
What did that morell bloke say again?:morell wrote:Each Div 6 side would have at least 2 or 3 players that could play in Division 1 with relative ease
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:49 pm
Indeed, we have recruited very well and are going OK.lutz wrote:A page or so back, you said that your side in D7 would have about 5 players that would walk into a D1 side.
I would suggest about 10%. About 1 or 2 from the mediocre sides and 3 or 4 from the good ones.lutz wrote:Maybe into an injury ravaged one resigned to relegation toward the end of the year. There are some good players in these grades sure, but very few could walk into a D1 or D2 side.
This I agree with.lutz wrote:Would take a bit of work in preseason I'd reckon.
Hard, perhaps, but it could very easily happen.lutz wrote:Even then, as someone else pointed out previously, a Gaza, Henley, or SPOC (etc) would have high quality in every position, and great depth...it would be hard to just walk into their club and take someone elses spot.
by Footy Follower » Tue May 29, 2012 5:50 pm
morell wrote:You're full on crazy if you think Luke McDonnell couldn't slot into a Div 1 side tomorrow. I know of players, right now, playing Div 1, that are nowhere near as capable a footballer as Luke is.scottroo wrote:Sorry morell the mcdonnells would full on struggle in div 1
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 5:52 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 29, 2012 6:06 pm
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 6:54 pm
Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
by Q. » Tue May 29, 2012 9:07 pm
BFG wrote:Houghton V lockleys will be a belter of a game up there. just out of interest how are your blokes travelling with injuries Q? would you say that your strongest side was the one we played R1?
by Jetters » Tue May 29, 2012 9:40 pm
morell wrote:Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
by morell » Tue May 29, 2012 10:29 pm
Exactly, thanks for agreeing. Please assist in explaining this principle to others and they have seemingly misunderstood my postings.Jetters wrote:morell wrote:Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Why is it such a big deal that you need to convince everyone that MP and other low ranked sides have good players that could play higher?? No sh!t you have players who could play higher, every club does, they are called the 'good players', you also have stinking players who could play lower. How boring would football be if the best 210 players played D1, the next best 210 playeed D2 etc.
Not at all. You have apparently missed the part where I said we would have players that wouldn't get anywhere near a Div 1 R side playing A grade.Jetters wrote:You do sound however like you have an over inflated view of the players at your club.
by Footy Follower » Wed May 30, 2012 10:22 am
Jetters wrote:morell wrote:Henceforth to be known as the Weekley-Boothey paradox as seemingly neither of those players have actually moved into the higher grades, contrary to all evidence.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Perhaps it could be of greater benefit for these higher grade clubs to raid the lower grades to save on points but still acquire quality footballers whose fitness can be worked on?
Why is it such a big deal that you need to convince everyone that MP and other low ranked sides have good players that could play higher?? No sh!t you have players who could play higher, every club does, they are called the 'good players', you also have stinking players who could play lower. How boring would football be if the best 210 players played D1, the next best 210 playeed D2 etc.
But in the end who cares, they play D7, not D1.
You do sound however like you have an over inflated view of the players at your club.
by White Unicorn » Wed May 30, 2012 10:54 am
bloozebrother wrote:The Riddler wrote:bloozebrother wrote:Didnt sumner make the state side from division 5? I witnessed Div 1 football last year and i reckon just about every team in div 6 would beat alot of the div 1 reserves teams. SHOC's C grade in Div 7 were better than the B grade in Div 1 res who only lost 2 games all year - mainly cause alot of players didnt like playing under the coach. I have seen some great footy this year from some very good players in Div 6 and do you think Uni's C grade is full of C graders? I dont think so! Since the SANFL abolished the u/17 & u/19 system more young players just move on to the local clubs. Some developed later and that 2nd year of u/19's was enough to propel them onto bigger and better things. But that opportunity got removed thanks to one - B Phillips!
I knew it!![]()
Went both ways riddler - the b grade coach couldnt identify the good players that flash had in his team. By finals time they had built a bond and werent going to split up. You faced a bloody good side in the granny - interesting that none of the premiership team have played Div 7 this year. The majority are playing A grade footy somewhere for a new club.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |