by mark shadiac » Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:34 pm
by Bluedemon » Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:49 am
by FootyMad » Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:58 pm
by Down&Out » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:50 pm
by mark shadiac » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:58 pm
Down&Out wrote:wouldn't cost so much if it was only the players going- more officials on these trips than players. Under 23 comp has been a waste of time- wrong players chosen and not taken seriously by players in the league
by FOOTYGODS » Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:44 am
by Benchwarmer » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:21 pm
by PhilG » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:21 pm
by Benchwarmer » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:32 pm
by Jayne » Mon May 07, 2007 10:38 pm
Benchwarmer wrote:Bloody oath - the best players are usually over 23 and why should they be barred from representing their league. If you are going to have a concept such as this, have the best against the best!
by gadj1976 » Mon May 07, 2007 11:36 pm
by Shirtfront » Tue May 08, 2007 10:30 am
by croc11 » Wed May 09, 2007 9:40 pm
by Shirtfront » Thu May 17, 2007 12:07 pm
croc11 wrote:Well gadj1976 you obviously didn't play in 1995 - i actually did and we smashed the West Australians at Goody Oval and then beat the Vics by about 2 goals at Elsternwick on a wet and rainy day. Probably one of the highlights of my footy life along with the other lads who played in that side.
And yes we are the last SAAFL side to beat the Vics - the Under 23's whilst a good concept is not the same - if you want the SAAFL to be the best comp and the A1 league undoubtedly still is - start working harder to beat the Vics and beat them in the main game, not an under age concept game.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |