pafc1870 wrote:only about 30 goals if they played them in a serious match
How do you arrive at this?
by JK » Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:40 am
pafc1870 wrote:only about 30 goals if they played them in a serious match
by sahboz » Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:06 am
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:LOL ummm doesnt the non selection give you the answer. THEY DIDNT BELIEVE HE WAS IN THEIR BEST 21 TO BEAT THE CENTRALS SIDE WHICH THEY THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE UP AGAINST.
And what you expect North to come out publicly and tell Port fans why he wasnt selected. Here's a tip i bet you the North board dont give a 5hite about the Port fans and their concerns. Any discussion they would have had on this matter would have been to the Power coaches in private.
we all know he was in their best 21, so stop trying act as if he wasn't. If they had a good enough reason why he wasn't they would of said so, to save them looking like idiots for not picking him.
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:55 am
JK wrote:pafc1870 wrote:only about 30 goals if they played them in a serious match
How do you arrive at this?
by Booney » Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:03 am
JK wrote:kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:LOL ummm doesnt the non selection give you the answer. THEY DIDNT BELIEVE HE WAS IN THEIR BEST 21 TO BEAT THE CENTRALS SIDE WHICH THEY THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE UP AGAINST.
And what you expect North to come out publicly and tell Port fans why he wasnt selected. Here's a tip i bet you the North board dont give a 5hite about the Port fans and their concerns. Any discussion they would have had on this matter would have been to the Power coaches in private.
we all know he was in their best 21, so stop trying act as if he wasn't. If they had a good enough reason why he wasn't they would of said so, to save them looking like idiots for not picking him.
To be fair there's not much difference between North Adelaide's best 21 and the Power's best 21
by Brodlach » Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:06 am
pafc1870 wrote:JK wrote:pafc1870 wrote:only about 30 goals if they played them in a serious match
How do you arrive at this?
the huge gap between the worst AFL team and the best SANFL team
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jim05 » Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:08 am
JK wrote:pafc1870 wrote:only about 30 goals if they played them in a serious match
How do you arrive at this?
by Jim05 » Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:10 am
Brodlach wrote:pafc1870 wrote:JK wrote:pafc1870 wrote:only about 30 goals if they played them in a serious match
How do you arrive at this?
the huge gap between the worst AFL team and the best SANFL team
Tipping Norwood to beat Melbourne ATM
by on the rails » Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 am
by Wedgie » Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:45 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by beenreal » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:05 am
on the rails wrote:Interesting in all of this debate is that North laid it's case out on the table to the Port Football Operations Staff re his transfer. The player also stated he didn't want to leave North and that he was happy but that apparently is not part of player development - letting them have some say!
If Port (and the Crows) don't think that playing in the Reserves Comp and at that Standard is good for player development and he only played 1 game yet they moved him because it was in his best interests then what are they going to say or blame when they are only able to field their own stand alone reserves sides in our Reserves Comp as that is the only option that the SANFL Club will even look at and that may not get voted in yet either.
If it does get voted in then Young and all the other non selected AFL players can get their 41 touches week in and week out against fringe SANFL Players and kids and along side fringe types who will be needed as list fillers to field a side. As other have pointed out how will that will that be better than the present system that both AFL Clubs think is broken?
by am Bays » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:24 am
Jim05 wrote:Brodlach wrote:pafc1870 wrote:the huge gap between the worst AFL team and the best SANFL team
Tipping Norwood to beat Melbourne ATM
Norwood wouldnt get close
by Dutchy » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:37 am
on the rails wrote:Interesting in all of this debate is that North laid it's case out on the table to the Port Football Operations Staff re his transfer. The player also stated he didn't want to leave North and that he was happy but that apparently is not part of player development - letting them have some say!
by Ronnie » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:37 am
by Dutchy » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:43 am
by Mr Beefy » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:47 am
by Booney » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:47 am
Wedgie wrote:I think I'm mostly enjoying the fact that Power fans are bragging about beating GWS by 56 points when the Northern Bullants beat GWS by 89 points in a shortened version of the game.
by kickinit » Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:20 am
by Brodlach » Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:24 am
kickinit wrote:where does everyone think the money will come from for the sanfl to survive if
1- the afl license is handed back
2- the crows and power have nothing to do with the sanfl.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Dogwatcher » Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:25 am
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:I think I'm mostly enjoying the fact that Power fans are bragging about beating GWS by 56 points when the Northern Bullants beat GWS by 89 points in a shortened version of the game.
Like to see this bragging "quoted".
by am Bays » Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:28 am
kickinit wrote:where does everyone think the money will come from for the sanfl to survive if
1- the afl license is handed back
2- the crows and power have nothing to do with the sanfl.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |