My guess it would only happen this year as a quirk of the ridiculous SANFL draw for 2007?
Even weirder is the side who is 4th has only lost to one club!

by Wedgie » Sat May 26, 2007 11:46 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by HeartBeatsTrue » Sun May 27, 2007 12:25 am
by spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 12:36 am
by spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 12:42 am
by Wedgie » Sun May 27, 2007 12:44 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 12:48 am
Wedgie wrote:Geezus Spelly, you never cease to amaze me with your stats, well done!
by HeartBeatsTrue » Sun May 27, 2007 12:27 pm
by smac » Sun May 27, 2007 1:12 pm
by SnappyTom » Sun May 27, 2007 1:29 pm
by purch » Sun May 27, 2007 3:46 pm
SnappyTom wrote:WAFL:
Ladder After Round 9 POS TEAM P W L D B FF For Ag PC Pts
1 Subiaco 7 8 0 0 1 0 1033 430 240.23 32
2 Claremont 8 6 2 0 1 0 760 681 111.60 24
3 West Perth 8 4 4 0 1 0 798 787 101.40 16
4 East Perth 7 4 4 0 1 0 702 709 99.01 16
5 South Fremantle 8 4 4 0 1 0 851 882 96.49 16
6 Swan Districts 8 4 4 0 1 0 732 889 82.34 16
7 East Fremantle 8 3 5 0 1 0 725 692 104.77 12
8 Perth 8 2 6 0 1 0 677 914 74.07 8
9 Peel Thunder 8 1 7 0 1 0 627 921 68.08 4
Subiaco 8 wins from 7 games. Hmmm...
by spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 6:36 pm
smac wrote:Has a team ever been so clear on top after so few rounds? The ladder this year is staggering, but that one you just put up is incredibly bizarre spelly.
by spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 9:35 pm
by Hondo » Sun May 27, 2007 9:41 pm
spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.
This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:
Round 5 1987
by redandblack » Sun May 27, 2007 9:52 pm
spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.
This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:
Round 5 1987
by spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 10:52 pm
redandblack wrote:spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.
This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:
Round 5 1987
Who finished up on top in 1909, spelly![]()
by smac » Mon May 28, 2007 9:59 am
spell_check wrote:So there still has only been 4 wins 3 losses after 8 rounds, and not 4 and 4:
by MightyEagles » Mon May 28, 2007 11:46 am
SnappyTom wrote:WAFL:
Ladder After Round 9 POS TEAM P W L D B FF For Ag PC Pts
1 Subiaco 7 8 0 0 1 0 1033 430 240.23 32
2 Claremont 8 6 2 0 1 0 760 681 111.60 24
3 West Perth 8 4 4 0 1 0 798 787 101.40 16
4 East Perth 7 4 4 0 1 0 702 709 99.01 16
5 South Fremantle 8 4 4 0 1 0 851 882 96.49 16
6 Swan Districts 8 4 4 0 1 0 732 889 82.34 16
7 East Fremantle 8 3 5 0 1 0 725 692 104.77 12
8 Perth 8 2 6 0 1 0 677 914 74.07 8
9 Peel Thunder 8 1 7 0 1 0 627 921 68.08 4
Subiaco 8 wins from 7 games. Hmmm...
by Benchwarmer » Mon May 28, 2007 1:28 pm
by doggies4eva » Mon May 28, 2007 3:42 pm
spell_check wrote:redandblack wrote:spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.
This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:
Round 5 1987
Who finished up on top in 1909, spelly![]()
I reckon with that grin, you answered your own question.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |