A New Record After Round 8??

All discussions to do with the SANFL

A New Record After Round 8??

Postby Wedgie » Sat May 26, 2007 11:46 pm

Over to you spelly but I'd be suprised if you'd find another year when the 2nd side has lost half of their games after 8 rounds?
My guess it would only happen this year as a quirk of the ridiculous SANFL draw for 2007?

Even weirder is the side who is 4th has only lost to one club! :?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Sun May 27, 2007 12:25 am

That would be because Port has played 13 matches more than everyone else. They now have the bye for the next 15 weeks ;)
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 12:36 am

There have been a few times where 2nd have been 4 and 3 after 8 rounds, 1994 for instance, but none on 4 and 4.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 12:42 am

1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.

This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:

Round 5 1987
Image
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby Wedgie » Sun May 27, 2007 12:44 am

Geezus Spelly, you never cease to amaze me with your stats, well done!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 12:48 am

Wedgie wrote:Geezus Spelly, you never cease to amaze me with your stats, well done!


Nothing that Excel (and Eckys' Access) can't handle! :) :wink:
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Sun May 27, 2007 12:27 pm

Should wait til the round is finished. If the Eagles win today by a healthy margin then they can go second.
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Postby smac » Sun May 27, 2007 1:12 pm

Has a team ever been so clear on top after so few rounds? The ladder this year is staggering, but that one you just put up is incredibly bizarre spelly.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

This has to be some kind of record...

Postby SnappyTom » Sun May 27, 2007 1:29 pm

WAFL:
Ladder After Round 9 POS TEAM P W L D B FF For Ag PC Pts
1 Subiaco 7 8 0 0 1 0 1033 430 240.23 32
2 Claremont 8 6 2 0 1 0 760 681 111.60 24
3 West Perth 8 4 4 0 1 0 798 787 101.40 16
4 East Perth 7 4 4 0 1 0 702 709 99.01 16
5 South Fremantle 8 4 4 0 1 0 851 882 96.49 16
6 Swan Districts 8 4 4 0 1 0 732 889 82.34 16
7 East Fremantle 8 3 5 0 1 0 725 692 104.77 12
8 Perth 8 2 6 0 1 0 677 914 74.07 8
9 Peel Thunder 8 1 7 0 1 0 627 921 68.08 4

Subiaco 8 wins from 7 games. Hmmm...
The cats of Australia have made their choice!!!
User avatar
SnappyTom
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:08 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: This has to be some kind of record...

Postby purch » Sun May 27, 2007 3:46 pm

SnappyTom wrote:WAFL:
Ladder After Round 9 POS TEAM P W L D B FF For Ag PC Pts
1 Subiaco 7 8 0 0 1 0 1033 430 240.23 32
2 Claremont 8 6 2 0 1 0 760 681 111.60 24
3 West Perth 8 4 4 0 1 0 798 787 101.40 16
4 East Perth 7 4 4 0 1 0 702 709 99.01 16
5 South Fremantle 8 4 4 0 1 0 851 882 96.49 16
6 Swan Districts 8 4 4 0 1 0 732 889 82.34 16
7 East Fremantle 8 3 5 0 1 0 725 692 104.77 12
8 Perth 8 2 6 0 1 0 677 914 74.07 8
9 Peel Thunder 8 1 7 0 1 0 627 921 68.08 4

Subiaco 8 wins from 7 games. Hmmm...


Struth, with a % of 240 they may as well be...
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
User avatar
purch
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:39 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 1 time

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 6:36 pm

smac wrote:Has a team ever been so clear on top after so few rounds? The ladder this year is staggering, but that one you just put up is incredibly bizarre spelly.


Yes.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 9:35 pm

So there still has only been 4 wins 3 losses after 8 rounds, and not 4 and 4:

Image
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby Hondo » Sun May 27, 2007 9:41 pm

spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.

This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:

Round 5 1987
Image


I think North only lost one more game for the '87 season after that? Spelly?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 9:45 pm

Yes, to Glenelg in Round 17.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby redandblack » Sun May 27, 2007 9:52 pm

spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.

This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:

Round 5 1987
Image


Who finished up on top in 1909, spelly :?: :D
redandblack
 

Postby spell_check » Sun May 27, 2007 10:52 pm

redandblack wrote:
spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.

This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:

Round 5 1987
Image


Who finished up on top in 1909, spelly :?: :D


I reckon with that grin, you answered your own question. :wink:
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re:

Postby smac » Mon May 28, 2007 9:59 am

spell_check wrote:So there still has only been 4 wins 3 losses after 8 rounds, and not 4 and 4:

Image

So the dogs are only 2.5 wins ahead of North, christ this seasons fixture makes it hard to keep up...

Puts a whole new perspective on the two games against North - could go a long way to deciding positions later in the season.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: This has to be some kind of record...

Postby MightyEagles » Mon May 28, 2007 11:46 am

SnappyTom wrote:WAFL:
Ladder After Round 9 POS TEAM P W L D B FF For Ag PC Pts
1 Subiaco 7 8 0 0 1 0 1033 430 240.23 32
2 Claremont 8 6 2 0 1 0 760 681 111.60 24
3 West Perth 8 4 4 0 1 0 798 787 101.40 16
4 East Perth 7 4 4 0 1 0 702 709 99.01 16
5 South Fremantle 8 4 4 0 1 0 851 882 96.49 16
6 Swan Districts 8 4 4 0 1 0 732 889 82.34 16
7 East Fremantle 8 3 5 0 1 0 725 692 104.77 12
8 Perth 8 2 6 0 1 0 677 914 74.07 8
9 Peel Thunder 8 1 7 0 1 0 627 921 68.08 4

Subiaco 8 wins from 7 games. Hmmm...


Then there is East Perth Played 7, won 4, lost 4.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Re: A New Record After Round 8??

Postby Benchwarmer » Mon May 28, 2007 1:28 pm

Spelly ... that's gold, son! 8)

Yes, unfortunately the WAFL is a case of Subiaco, Subiaco and Subiaco. It's just a matter of who should play them in the Grand Final (I know there is no such thing as a dead cert, but c'mon guys let's face it!). Claremont, maybe East Perth but unfortunately that about it ... my Sharkies have tailed off rather badly of late with a case of AFL Disease (where teams kick twice as many behinds as goals).
User avatar
Benchwarmer
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Sunny Perth
Has liked: 254 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Callington

Re:

Postby doggies4eva » Mon May 28, 2007 3:42 pm

spell_check wrote:
redandblack wrote:
spell_check wrote:1909 is another time where 2nd has been on 4 and 3 after 8 rounds.

This is after 5 rounds in a particular season, but you'd be hard pressed to see a more even ladder than this:

Round 5 1987
Image


Who finished up on top in 1909, spelly :?: :D


I reckon with that grin, you answered your own question. :wink:


With 3.5 wins out of 6 games really Norf are second, then Eagles, Sturt and Port. I usually look at games lost as this is a better indicator of how teams are travelling.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |