Psyber wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Education is actually a State function.Tell me something: why was Garrett going there?
To mark some test papers?
He was there to make political statements
How about letting the little beggars get on with learning.
By the way, Julia, abortion is actually a State issue as well.
Blue ties are a personal issue
(I'm wearing one today)
So was Kevin Rudd on TV this morning!
And the states do run the education system and
even under Gonski would have to put up
most of the money.
That's why they are reluctant to sign up - the federal money has strings.
Education is both a responsibility of the Federal and State Governments, hence why we have both a Commonwealth Department of Education and a State Department of Education. The Commonwealth has more power in Education than the states, simply because our constitution states that in areas of concurrent powers (such as Education) the Commonwealth law will always prevail.
An example of this was in the Franklin Dam case where the Tasmanian State Government wanted a dam built but the Commonwealth was able to stop it.
Under the law the way it is, the Federal Minister of Education carries more weight than the State Minister of Education.
Cheers