johnny bravo wrote:[Mawson Lakes have reason to be angry also IMO, if this game was played at Central United they'd be playing finals this weekend.!
Not necessarily.
by Footy Chick » Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:30 pm
johnny bravo wrote:[Mawson Lakes have reason to be angry also IMO, if this game was played at Central United they'd be playing finals this weekend.!
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by morell » Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:35 pm
by secondstring » Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:49 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:52 pm
secondstring wrote:Dutchy is trying his best to change things out there but might be a big task. One thing i did notice, was that after each time someone was suspended and served there SAAFl handed down penalty, they came back straight into the A grade. I would of thought a club imposed penalty as well may have helped?
by Footy Chick » Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:55 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:secondstring wrote:Dutchy is trying his best to change things out there but might be a big task. One thing i did notice, was that after each time someone was suspended and served there SAAFl handed down penalty, they came back straight into the A grade. I would of thought a club imposed penalty as well may have helped?
It's a tough one, especially if they are an influential and important A grade footballer and you are fighting to either make finals or avoid relegation - or both if it is a very even competition like this year.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by secondstring » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:06 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:secondstring wrote:Dutchy is trying his best to change things out there but might be a big task. One thing i did notice, was that after each time someone was suspended and served there SAAFl handed down penalty, they came back straight into the A grade. I would of thought a club imposed penalty as well may have helped?
It's a tough one, especially if they are an influential and important A grade footballer and you are fighting to either make finals or avoid relegation - or both if it is a very even competition like this year.
by johnny bravo » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:09 pm
Footy Chick wrote:johnny bravo wrote:[Mawson Lakes have reason to be angry also IMO, if this game was played at Central United they'd be playing finals this weekend.!
Not necessarily.
by Footy Chick » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:22 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by sprinttospace » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:26 pm
johnny bravo wrote:Footy Chick wrote:johnny bravo wrote:[Mawson Lakes have reason to be angry also IMO, if this game was played at Central United they'd be playing finals this weekend.!
Not necessarily.
Blackfriars haven't won an away game all year, CU is a 5 goal better team at home, Mofflin is one of the toughest road trips in the comp I'm pretty confident in saying CU would have beaten them at home.
by zedman » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:30 pm
johnny bravo wrote:Footy Chick wrote:johnny bravo wrote:[Mawson Lakes have reason to be angry also IMO, if this game was played at Central United they'd be playing finals this weekend.!
Not necessarily.
Blackfriars haven't won an away game all year, CU is a 5 goal better team at home, Mofflin is one of the toughest road trips in the comp I'm pretty confident in saying CU would have beaten them at home.
by Footy Chick » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:42 pm
secondstring wrote:Cohiba wrote:morell wrote:A couple of people have since told me that there were a few reasons why it was moved. Mostly related to the on and off field record CU have and the need to mitigate as much risk as possible for the last round of the year.
Fair enough I would have thought.
Up to Round 18 "they did the crime" and "then they did the time"....metaphorically speaking. If the reason to mitigate a potential risk is based on past transgressions, that then should have been made clear to CU that they are in affect "on parole" with restrictions at the time of being handed the penalties (which they thoroughly deserved). The Leagues actions (if true) are seemingly based on the premise the entire Club is not to be trusted so presume the worst without any regard the impact any such action may have on a club that has already paid for its past transgressions....The Club has an image problem, they know it, and have already taken action to address these problems. If the League Executives concern is for a group of Pollies whose own governance has seen them effectively "stuff up" this country (IMO) during their time in office, are so sensitive about being exposed to Amateur League Football or wherever it is played, let them have the meeting at a Blackfriars Schoolboys game where there sensibilities may be less offended. But don't stuff up a Club's (good or bad) endeavours to raise finances from promoted events at such short notice based on the assumption of what might occur. At the very least the should have the decency consider to compensate them if the want to play "politics" ahead of the interests of one of its own members.
Probably one of the best posts i have read on this site. Yes the club has had some bad publicity in the past, but having no consideration for the effort they had put in for there home game crowd and sponsors day is wrong in my book.
If the club is to be punished, do it at the time, not on a Thursday before the game and making your decision on what you think may happen.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by secondstring » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:54 pm
by giffo » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:58 pm
sprinttospace wrote:johnny bravo wrote:Footy Chick wrote:johnny bravo wrote:[Mawson Lakes have reason to be angry also IMO, if this game was played at Central United they'd be playing finals this weekend.!
Not necessarily.
Blackfriars haven't won an away game all year, CU is a 5 goal better team at home, Mofflin is one of the toughest road trips in the comp I'm pretty confident in saying CU would have beaten them at home.
I hadn't realised that. Not a good sign for this weekend in the rematch of the 2012 elimination final that was played at our ground and Locks got up by a point in the last minute.
by NO-MERCY » Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:22 pm
Bloods4Life wrote:human_torpedo wrote:Quality post there No Mercy, any danger of getting a fact correct?
But anyway, massive game this week v CLG.. Looking like finals has come a week early with plenty on the line for all finals aspirants.. Winner of Rosies CLG earn a week off and all finals as home games.. Winner of WOS and Locks get a double chance.. BOS have the first of 2 possible elimination finals this week, there next loss is there last..
Really starting to crank up now, hopefully the last couple of weeks will act as a learning curve for us and we can turn it around and get back to playing our best.. Up the kennel
Would've thought no mercy is spot on the money!
by Cohiba » Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:43 pm
secondstring wrote:Not sticking up for United here and completely understand the League coukdnt do anything until Garner went up, but how many tines has a club lost a home game over a striking charge. Feeling a bit for Smithfield.
by human_torpedo » Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:45 pm
by lutz » Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:53 pm
by Yank Man » Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:14 pm
zedman wrote:Relegation FC?
by zedman » Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:50 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |