by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:33 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:56 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Every club has band wagoners Jim. How are Essendon propping up other clubs?
Been awhile since the swans have had 1 or 2 lean years.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:03 pm
Jim05 wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Every club has band wagoners Jim. How are Essendon propping up other clubs?
Been awhile since the swans have had 1 or 2 lean years.
If we have 58,000 members now while not going great id love to see how many we can get if we start being competitive, perhaps 80,000 like Collingwood.
Not just Essendon propping up clubs but all the clubs who get big attendances, there are plenty of clubs getting hand outs each year. Who do you think is footing the bill for Paul Roos? certaintly not Melbourne.
Demetriou stated today that the AFL will cop a huge hit to its bottom line by Collingwood and Richmond being eliminated last week. By Port playing Geelong instead of Collingwood v Geelong the AFL could lose potentially up to $1m at the gates alone.
by Jim05 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:10 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Jim05 wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Every club has band wagoners Jim. How are Essendon propping up other clubs?
Been awhile since the swans have had 1 or 2 lean years.
If we have 58,000 members now while not going great id love to see how many we can get if we start being competitive, perhaps 80,000 like Collingwood.
Not just Essendon propping up clubs but all the clubs who get big attendances, there are plenty of clubs getting hand outs each year. Who do you think is footing the bill for Paul Roos? certaintly not Melbourne.
Demetriou stated today that the AFL will cop a huge hit to its bottom line by Collingwood and Richmond being eliminated last week. By Port playing Geelong instead of Collingwood v Geelong the AFL could lose potentially up to $1m at the gates alone.
Guess the 1.25 billion tv/media deal might help also. The AFL has done ok with Essendon and Richmond hardly having an involvement in the last decade come finals, I'm sure they will manage.
by GWW » Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:35 pm
by daysofourlives » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:01 pm
Jim05 wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Every club has band wagoners Jim. How are Essendon propping up other clubs?
Been awhile since the swans have had 1 or 2 lean years.
If we have 58,000 members now while not going great id love to see how many we can get if we start being competitive, perhaps 80,000 like Collingwood.
Not just Essendon propping up clubs but all the clubs who get big attendances, there are plenty of clubs getting hand outs each year. Who do you think is footing the bill for Paul Roos? certaintly not Melbourne.
Demetriou stated today that the AFL will cop a huge hit to its bottom line by Collingwood and Richmond being eliminated last week. By Port playing Geelong instead of Collingwood v Geelong the AFL could lose potentially up to $1m at the gates alone.
by Jim05 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:36 pm
GWW wrote:If there was more equality/fairness in the fixture (eg.Friday night games), there would be less need for richer clubs to "prop up" the not so wealthy ones.
by GWW » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:35 am
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:44 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:31 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:34 am
GWW wrote:Problem with that though is its self-perpetuating situation.
If clubs miss out on Friday night games, they miss out on exposure and ability to maximise sponsorship.
Meanwhile the status quo continues, and the gap between the richer and poorer continues to grow.
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:38 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Such a litigious club are the Bombers. Hope it goes to court.
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:58 am
Sky Pilot wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Such a litigious club are the Bombers. Hope it goes to court.
So are you saying Essendon should just shrug off an incorrect claim such as this. Only asking...
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:17 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Such a litigious club are the Bombers. Hope it goes to court.
So are you saying Essendon should just shrug off an incorrect claim such as this. Only asking...
Incorrect claim? Deluded much. The sooner you accept all this, the much happier you will be. Copped some big penalties for doing "nothing wrong".
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:24 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Such a litigious club are the Bombers. Hope it goes to court.
So are you saying Essendon should just shrug off an incorrect claim such as this. Only asking...
Incorrect claim? Deluded much. The sooner you accept all this, the much happier you will be. Copped some big penalties for doing "nothing wrong".
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:27 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Such a litigious club are the Bombers. Hope it goes to court.
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:29 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:34 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:Who do you reckon will coach us in 2014 Jim?
by woodublieve12 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:40 pm
Jim05 wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:Who do you reckon will coach us in 2014 Jim?
Goodwin would be my choice but I think the board will take someone from outside of the club.
Laidley has an interview today, I wouldnt be surprised to see him or Harvey get the job
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:51 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:Who do you reckon will coach us in 2014 Jim?
Goodwin would be my choice but I think the board will take someone from outside of the club.
Laidley has an interview today, I wouldnt be surprised to see him or Harvey get the job
not stirring, but it would be hard job to take... Yeah you've got a great list, but after 12 months you're gone.... Would top 4 finish secure your job for the following year or what about a flag (unlikely to win one)??? It would be hard to pass back to hird if next year is successful, surely!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |