by SDK » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:24 pm
by rod_rooster » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:27 pm
by Hondo » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:35 pm
by G » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:35 pm
by BPBRB » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:45 pm
G wrote:Absolutely spot on SDK on all points.
The guernsey was crap and there is NO need for North to wear any other strip because it doesnt clash with any other club.
Another strip for Heritage reasons is understandable but not that ordinary jumper from yesterday and I dont want to hear they sell the guernsey to help the clubs finances - not relevant in NORTHs case.
by BPBRB » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:17 pm
NFC wrote:Horrible jumper.
by rod_rooster » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:32 pm
BPBRB wrote:G wrote:Absolutely spot on SDK on all points.
The guernsey was crap and there is NO need for North to wear any other strip because it doesnt clash with any other club.
Another strip for Heritage reasons is understandable but not that ordinary jumper from yesterday and I dont want to hear they sell the guernsey to help the clubs finances - not relevant in NORTHs case.
I don't mind it and have got used to it but I agree that we don't need an alternative strip but if we have to have one then why not a white jumper with a big red V (similar to Sth Fremantle - I like their jumper) instead of the thin v on our current alternative strip.
by NFC » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:48 pm
BPBRB wrote:NFC wrote:Horrible jumper.
Now you could apply that to describing Nwds normal strip which is one of the dullest dark blobs ever worn. Even your alternative jumpers is better than your normal one.
by goraw » Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:06 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:25 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by SnappyTom » Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:30 pm
Wedgie wrote:Agree with most, ugly and not needed.
They actually do look better close up (I have one from last year) but a pointless exercise.
If they were going to go for an alternate jumper for marketing purposes (I cant see any other purpose) then the 1930s guernsey that is basically a reversal of their normal jumper is (ie white with red vee) would be the way to go as that's a great looking guernsey.
Having said that we have worn the alternate strip 3 times and won 3 times in it!
by rod_rooster » Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:49 pm
SnappyTom wrote:Wedgie wrote:Agree with most, ugly and not needed.
They actually do look better close up (I have one from last year) but a pointless exercise.
If they were going to go for an alternate jumper for marketing purposes (I cant see any other purpose) then the 1930s guernsey that is basically a reversal of their normal jumper is (ie white with red vee) would be the way to go as that's a great looking guernsey.
Having said that we have worn the alternate strip 3 times and won 3 times in it!
Why not suggest using it against us at Prospect...
by Hondo » Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:57 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:15 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by johntheclaret » Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:34 am
by Jimmy » Mon Jul 09, 2007 6:04 am
by Ian » Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:27 am
by Jimmy » Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:46 am
Ian wrote:Not even close to the ugliest guernsey going around, but not needed, the only side we could now possibly clash with would be West wearing their alternate strip, and I'm sure West would never wear that when playing North, so not even an issue.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |