by cd » Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:59 pm
by Mickyj » Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:24 pm
BPBRB wrote:eddie-eagle wrote:dogs01 wrote:Aerie wrote:I expect the Eagles to win. I believe the Eagles are building to a level equal or better than last year. I don't think the Dogs have made up 76 points worth of ground.
Dogs this year are by far a better side than last year. More settled and less players running around with injuries, unlike last year.
Just because the eagles beat the dogs in a Gf doesnt automatically make them a better team than the dogs this year.
Looking at what the two clubs have gained and lost over the summer to improve their lists , the dogs would be miles ahead.(probably more than 76 points)
Not sure miles ahead, just watched the 2006 GF highlights todaydon't forget the 2005 Jack Oatey Medallist Mcabe retired after the GF humiliation, albeit offset by the recruiting of Callinan.
The dogs would be hungrier but the fear of losing again will bring its own pressure come finals.
Something when it comes to GF's the Eagles are more than qualified in. Another sweeping statement!
by BPBRB » Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:44 pm
Mickyj wrote: Umm yeah the Eagles can see what losing finals is like from beating North in finals year after year as well.
by Aerie » Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:16 pm
BPBRB wrote:Aerie wrote:I expect the Eagles to win. I believe the Eagles are building to a level equal or better than last year. I don't think the Dogs have made up 76 points worth of ground.
That's a "sweeping" statement. Despite the Eagles having a horrendous run of injuries which accounts for someof the form and the slow build up, you have still a long way to go to get a top 3 spot by the end of the minor round (although I think North's form slump will probably help you
) but your not the same side you were last year but again you haven't been anywhere near full strength so the jury is still out at this stage.
I think the Dogs are a much stronger and far more versatile side this year and from what I have seen so far I think that 76 points might be the minimum margin your team will lose by if Centrals decide to turn it on tommorow.
by JamesH » Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:15 pm
by pipers » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:17 am
JamesH wrote:Sorry Sturt & North.... this looks like a GF preview
by Mickyj » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:08 pm
fatalberton wrote:JamesH wrote:Sorry Sturt & North.... this looks like a GF preview
Three horse race in my optinion.
Dogs
Blues
Eagles
Eagles will win this week, but when it comes to the crunch, Dogs will prevail.
I'd actually like to see a 2002 rematch. The best two sides I've seen this year, by a long shot.
by Aerie » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:13 pm
Mickyj wrote:Interesting thought but I would say Port helped the eagles find some form .
by Apachebulldog » Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:02 pm
by sturt1 » Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:51 pm
by pipers » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:41 pm
Aerie wrote:Mickyj wrote:Interesting thought but I would say Port helped the eagles find some form .
That's for sure. I've never seen a side play that badly for a win as we did that day!
by Wedgie » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:43 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by pipers » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:45 pm
Wedgie wrote:CENTRAL v EAGLES
Latest odds from sportsbet.com.au:
Central $1.53
Eagles $2.45
by Mickyj » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:46 pm
fatalberton wrote:Aerie wrote:Mickyj wrote:Interesting thought but I would say Port helped the eagles find some form .
That's for sure. I've never seen a side play that badly for a win as we did that day!
Exactly - you're s***t.
by Mickyj » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:50 pm
fatalberton wrote:Wedgie wrote:CENTRAL v EAGLES
Latest odds from sportsbet.com.au:
Central $1.53
Eagles $2.45
Nice value on the Eagles...
by Wedgie » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:51 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Grahaml » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:53 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:55 pm
Grahaml wrote:Port have 1 win from the last 11 rounds by my reckoning. Worse than s***t probably fits pretty well ATM.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by doggies4eva » Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:26 pm
Wedgie wrote:Grahaml wrote:Port have 1 win from the last 11 rounds by my reckoning. Worse than s***t probably fits pretty well ATM.
Does that mean North are worse than worse than s***t?
by eaglehaslanded » Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:42 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |