Botham did it 5 timesSenor Moto Gadili wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I don't know about that stat but this is the third time Ashwin has made a hundred and taken a five wicket haul in test cricket, Ian Botham has done the most at five times.Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Just wondering how many players have taken 10 wickets and made a hundred in a test match. Ashwin a big chance to do it.
There are 3 players who made a century and taken 10 wickets in a test.
1. Ian Botham
2. Imran Khan
3. Shakib Al Hassan
Alan Davidson took 10 wickets and made more than a hundred runs, but he didn't make a century in an innings.
Can Ashwin be the 4th?
Dutchy wrote:Yep Foakes was outstanding in the 1st innings, one of this stumpings was ridiculously quick, one of the best gloveman I've seen for a long time.
I think they took the punt that England wouldn't be able to handle a dust bowl and that they would fair much better.stampy wrote:india lose the first test so what do they do??, serve up a dustbowl for the 2nd test, ......................simples!
Corona Man wrote:Dutchy wrote:Yep Foakes was outstanding in the 1st innings, one of this stumpings was ridiculously quick, one of the best gloveman I've seen for a long time.
stan wrote:I think they took the punt that England wouldn't be able to handle a dust bowl and that they would fair much better.stampy wrote:india lose the first test so what do they do??, serve up a dustbowl for the 2nd test, ......................simples!
Turns out to be the right move for them. Going to see some ugly pitches going forward in this series now.
I think the result would be the same. The English spinners are pie chuckers and Ashwin would have cleaned England up on Day 1tigerpie wrote:stan wrote:I think they took the punt that England wouldn't be able to handle a dust bowl and that they would fair much better.stampy wrote:india lose the first test so what do they do??, serve up a dustbowl for the 2nd test, ......................simples!
Turns out to be the right move for them. Going to see some ugly pitches going forward in this series now.
Same venue as the first test, same curator, same dust bowl.
But India won the toss.
If the POM's won it then they'd be 2 nil up by the end of today's play.
Risky business!
Yeah agree with that. It's more of a dust bowl than the first test. Almost like they just rolled it and used it again.Jim05 wrote:I think the result would be the same. The English spinners are pie chuckers and Ashwin would have cleaned England up on Day 1tigerpie wrote:stan wrote:I think they took the punt that England wouldn't be able to handle a dust bowl and that they would fair much better.stampy wrote:india lose the first test so what do they do??, serve up a dustbowl for the 2nd test, ......................simples!
Turns out to be the right move for them. Going to see some ugly pitches going forward in this series now.
Same venue as the first test, same curator, same dust bowl.
But India won the toss.
If the POM's won it then they'd be 2 nil up by the end of today's play.
Risky business!
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
tigerpie wrote:stan wrote:I think they took the punt that England wouldn't be able to handle a dust bowl and that they would fair much better.stampy wrote:india lose the first test so what do they do??, serve up a dustbowl for the 2nd test, ......................simples!
Turns out to be the right move for them. Going to see some ugly pitches going forward in this series now.
Same venue as the first test, same curator, same dust bowl.
But India won the toss.
If the POM's won it then they'd be 2 nil up by the end of today's play.
Risky business!
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:7 down
locky801 wrote:Brodlach wrote:7 down
will raise you one to 8
And 9locky801 wrote:Brodlach wrote:7 down
will raise you one to 8