by redden whites » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:58 pm
by smac » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:02 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:good call smac
well worth the $0.02
by locky801 » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:34 pm
by Sojourner » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:57 pm
by westcoastpanther » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:09 am
Sojourner wrote:Alternativley the SANFL could looking into changing from being the SANFL to the AMFL - Adelaide Metropolitan Football Leauge.
Considering that in many sides the number of players imported from other competitions outnumbers the players gained from the country zones, coupled with the fact that the SANFL is not interested in actually being National across South Australia, maybe the name AMFL is a cap that fits rather than the name SANFL which is clearly not a true representation of what the competition actually is....?
by BPBRB » Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:12 pm
BPBRB wrote:If you want to see your team play more often (and god knows why because they are s***t)
sojourner wrote:There go the windows in the Glasshouse........
by Dirko » Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:13 pm
smac wrote:A lot of people stuck with that team and have become more passionate over time (I know that's the case for me with Essendon). A lot of other people chose to support the newly formed locally based club.
My $0.02.
by smac » Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:18 pm
SJABC wrote:smac wrote:A lot of people stuck with that team and have become more passionate over time (I know that's the case for me with Essendon). A lot of other people chose to support the newly formed locally based club.
My $0.02.
That's all Essendon are worth smac $0.02...
by Wedgie » Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:08 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sojourner » Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:30 pm
BPBRB wrote:Comparing North to your club is hardly appropriate for that old anology!
by Wedgie » Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:52 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by redden whites » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:50 pm
Wedgie wrote:Actually there's been a bit of personal abuse by a few people on this topic.
Cheers.
by Keefy » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:35 pm
by Sojourner » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:48 pm
Keefy wrote:I'm disappointed that South aren't playing down at Encounter Bay again next season. I took the family to Round 1 this past season and had an enjoyable day apart from the result. The weather was great, the kids enjoyed themselves and we all went back to the pub in Victor after the game for a meal.
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:41 pm
Keefy wrote:I'm disappointed that South aren't playing down at Encounter Bay again next season. I took the family to Round 1 this past season and had an enjoyable day apart from the result. The weather was great, the kids enjoyed themselves and we all went back to the pub in Victor after the game for a meal.
by BPBRB » Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:33 am
Sojourner wrote:BPBRB wrote:Comparing North to your club is hardly appropriate for that old anology!
I am not the one declaring that sides that other posters support are "sh*t" either. The analogy was supposed to be a polite way of letting you know that I found your comments offensive.
A number of posters here on SAFooty came from a board where those type of abusive comments were made until it effectivley ended the forum over there. I find your comment that you think the club that I am a member of is Sh*t extremely offensive and inappropriate for a forum that is about encouraging people to support the SANFL.
So if it is what you are looking for, no I wont take your bait and respond with a load of negative tripe about the North Adelaide Football Club.
by JK » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:55 am
by TroyGFC » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:03 pm
by HeartBeatsTrue » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:04 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Perhaps ALL trials could be played in country zones? and maybe 4 games per season proper (with 8 different teams involved once)?
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:38 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |