Always dangerous to say a team will improve with unprovens coming in and proven performance leaving.
Not saying it wont happen (as it does quite often) but dangerous none the less as quite often proves to not happen.
by Wedgie » Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:15 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by bayman » Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:26 pm
topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote: I think Norwood's outs outweigh their ins
And I think most people who watch Norwood week and week out would know that McGuiness is the only significant loss.
by Wedgie » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:08 pm
bayman wrote:topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote: I think Norwood's outs outweigh their ins
And I think most people who watch Norwood week and week out would know that McGuiness is the only significant loss.
topsy, i'd add bailey to that list he may be loose in defence but he gets a lot of it & charges forward making it into an attacking play imo
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:53 pm
by topsywaldron » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:06 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Think realistically the coach might be coaching for his career this season too, so that could be another added element which could ge either way.
by sturtpeter » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:10 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:24 pm
by Punk Rooster » Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by smac » Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:17 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:backwards- eagles, port
neutral- north, sturt, glenelg, centrals, norwood
improvers- west, south
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |