by cd » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:07 pm
by bayman » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:17 pm
by Thiele » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:34 pm
by cd » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:03 pm
by Thiele » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:10 pm
by bayman » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:13 pm
by cd » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:16 pm
by bayman » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:35 pm
cd wrote:Bayman I believe reports are 50 metre penalty.
by Mickyj » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:50 pm
bayman wrote:interesting result, (i thought he'd get either a reprimand or 1 game) a bit late i thought & he's lucky he's not in the afl he'd get a minimum of 3 games
so cd, ben got found not guilty of what ? because everyone saw him run into the back of mules' ?
by CENTURION » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:58 pm
cd wrote:Ben Schwarze found not guilty tonight.
by bayman » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:59 pm
Mickyj wrote:bayman wrote:interesting result, (i thought he'd get either a reprimand or 1 game) a bit late i thought & he's lucky he's not in the afl he'd get a minimum of 3 games
so cd, ben got found not guilty of what ? because everyone saw him run into the back of mules' ?
gee bayman it sounds like sour grapes mate .Your team destroyed the eagles and one player gets off from running into the back of a player taking a mark .tough times if u support the bays .
by spell_check » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:01 pm
bayman wrote:interesting result, (i thought he'd get either a reprimand or 1 game) a bit late i thought & he's lucky he's not in the afl he'd get a minimum of 3 games
so cd, ben got found not guilty of what ? because everyone saw him run into the back of mules' ?
by woodwt » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:07 pm
spell_check wrote:bayman wrote:interesting result, (i thought he'd get either a reprimand or 1 game) a bit late i thought & he's lucky he's not in the afl he'd get a minimum of 3 games
so cd, ben got found not guilty of what ? because everyone saw him run into the back of mules' ?
I thought he'd get a reprimand myself, after pleading guilty.
by Mickyj » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:29 pm
bayman wrote:Mickyj wrote:bayman wrote:interesting result, (i thought he'd get either a reprimand or 1 game) a bit late i thought & he's lucky he's not in the afl he'd get a minimum of 3 games
so cd, ben got found not guilty of what ? because everyone saw him run into the back of mules' ?
gee bayman it sounds like sour grapes mate .Your team destroyed the eagles and one player gets off from running into the back of a player taking a mark .tough times if u support the bays .
not at all, just saying how i saw it, obviously i am wrong because he was found not guilty but even you just said he ran into the back of a player (mules) taking a mark, i'm presuming you were at the game so i'll ask you my friend if it was a afl game what would have happened at the tribunal ? & i did say good luck to him
by Pseudo » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:44 pm
by Brodlach » Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:25 pm
Thiele wrote:any news on ferguson
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by ca » Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:32 pm
Brodlach wrote:Thiele wrote:any news on ferguson
Ferguson was found not guilty, but that was right in front of me and I think he might have been lucky.
by wycbloods » Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:43 pm
by JK » Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:49 pm
Brodlach wrote:Thiele wrote:any news on ferguson
Ferguson was found not guilty, but that was right in front of me and I think he might have been lucky.
by cd » Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:15 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |