by another grub » Tue May 23, 2006 11:43 am
by steiger » Tue May 23, 2006 12:29 pm
another grub wrote:Can I just comment on the Times' coverage issue btb. The GM obviously has commitments and cant get to all the games every week. He can only go off the information provided (which is very little). No write-up will be included on the Districts game on Thursday as no one bothered to get back to the GM (ie coach). If people don't want to promote their sport they should take the blame not a sportswriter who makes many a phone call and gets no response.
by eags » Tue May 23, 2006 1:46 pm
by another grub » Tue May 23, 2006 2:18 pm
by steiger » Tue May 23, 2006 3:50 pm
by bluestheboy » Tue May 23, 2006 10:16 pm
by our_longreach » Wed May 24, 2006 7:33 am
bluestheboy wrote:The resident troll seems to have stirred up TRR and JQ...fellas rise above it. We all voted to keep him in, doesn't mean we have to take any notice of what he says. Dont forget....
by westcoastpanther » Wed May 24, 2006 9:46 am
bluestheboy wrote:As for WCP's old Lincoln District chestbeating, it's a tradition based on past history not unlike valentines day. Some choose to get involved each year, but no body can really remember what it's about. As most of us City supporters are firmly based in the current era, when Lincoln City has by far been the dominant side, we need only smile and look forward to another dominant mortlock.
by therealROSSCO » Wed May 24, 2006 9:49 am
WhiteTips wrote:If you want to complain about confidentiality......unfortuanetly this is a public site and you dont have the write to your name being confidential. If you dont want your name next to yourself when your taking the piss out of someone, then dont post on the site.
by bluestheboy » Wed May 24, 2006 9:58 am
by therealROSSCO » Wed May 24, 2006 9:58 am
by bluestheboy » Wed May 24, 2006 10:11 am
westcoastpanther wrote:bluestheboy wrote:As for WCP's old Lincoln District chestbeating, it's a tradition based on past history not unlike valentines day. Some choose to get involved each year, but no body can really remember what it's about. As most of us City supporters are firmly based in the current era, when Lincoln City has by far been the dominant side, we need only smile and look forward to another dominant mortlock.
You have got to be f...g kidding me don't ya!!!! City have been absolutely pathetic for near on 30 years, there can be no come back to that. Rather than debate this issue, yourself and TRR offer reasons why (transient nature etc) they have been the weak link of PL in representative footy. To then offer the above is laughable. How long is an era, 1 year??? And do try to remember, you fluked your win coming from the early Saturday game against Far West while Districts took care of Flinders and Mid West for you, both favourites for the title. We also didn't lose a Mortlock match for three years only two years ago. Cities era, pfft......
I sense I've swallowed some bait here but your not getting away with that sort of tripe.....
by westcoastpanther » Wed May 24, 2006 10:12 am
by bluestheboy » Wed May 24, 2006 11:32 am
OK lets talk about 2003 to 2005 era.westcoastpanther wrote:I'm only qualified to argue about era's during my playing days, which started in 85. Fire away.....
by westcoastpanther » Wed May 24, 2006 11:46 am
by bluestheboy » Wed May 24, 2006 12:06 pm
by westcoastpanther » Wed May 24, 2006 12:18 pm
by therealROSSCO » Wed May 24, 2006 12:27 pm
by bluestheboy » Wed May 24, 2006 12:31 pm
Absolutely incorrect panther, last year was the sweetest of all by a long way. Not many times you geta chance to end the Roosters and Rangers seasons in successive games, and then beat Mallees in the GF. They were the team that we really wanted (and needed) to beat in the big one.westcoastpanther wrote:2 out of 3, not bad, couldn't beat the side you really wanted to though (gee that was a satisfying day).
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |