by Cougar » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:08 am
by Bat Pad » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:41 am
Cougar wrote:Think you'll find Kersbrook and other suitors may have been approached by Gums. I know Kersbrook's reply was 'Thanks, but No Thanks'.
If Brett was to leave, Kersbrook would possibly lose the best coach in the Hills, so naturally would weaken the Brookers. But he would leave Kersbrook 'A' grade the stongest in the history of the Club (IMO) and in the toughest I've ever seen Div 2 Hills (Country). But with players like Lees, DeLuica, Parasiers, Pearce Bros, P.James, Faruiga, Bingos, Hall still around, and with a strong nucleus of Under 10s and 12s coming through, and an Oval to play on next season, think we'll be alright and won't need any Black and White!
by Cougar » Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:04 am
Bat Pad wrote:Cougar wrote:Think you'll find Kersbrook and other suitors may have been approached by Gums. I know Kersbrook's reply was 'Thanks, but No Thanks'.
If Brett was to leave, Kersbrook would possibly lose the best coach in the Hills, so naturally would weaken the Brookers. But he would leave Kersbrook 'A' grade the stongest in the history of the Club (IMO) and in the toughest I've ever seen Div 2 Hills (Country). But with players like Lees, DeLuica, Parasiers, Pearce Bros, P.James, Faruiga, Bingos, Hall still around, and with a strong nucleus of Under 10s and 12s coming through, and an Oval to play on next season, think we'll be alright and won't need any Black and White!
To survive you might be alright, but i was meaning being a contender in the A's. From what you posted, without Brett James i take it it might be a few years before Kersbrook contend for an A grade flag again. would i be correct?
by Q. » Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:07 am
Quichey wrote:Sorry if it's already been mentioned, but where are the two finals being held this week?
by The Sorce » Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:27 am
by Bat Pad » Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:07 am
Cougar wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Cougar wrote:Think you'll find Kersbrook and other suitors may have been approached by Gums. I know Kersbrook's reply was 'Thanks, but No Thanks'.
If Brett was to leave, Kersbrook would possibly lose the best coach in the Hills, so naturally would weaken the Brookers. But he would leave Kersbrook 'A' grade the stongest in the history of the Club (IMO) and in the toughest I've ever seen Div 2 Hills (Country). But with players like Lees, DeLuica, Parasiers, Pearce Bros, P.James, Faruiga, Bingos, Hall still around, and with a strong nucleus of Under 10s and 12s coming through, and an Oval to play on next season, think we'll be alright and won't need any Black and White!
To survive you might be alright, but i was meaning being a contender in the A's. From what you posted, without Brett James i take it it might be a few years before Kersbrook contend for an A grade flag again. would i be correct?
Well Kersbrook have missed the Finals twice (Even then, they won more than they lost) in 16 years, which probably means they're been a contender most years, so it would be a brave person to suggest they won't be again next season, with or without Brett.
by Cougar » Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:51 am
by Bat Pad » Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:34 pm
Cougar wrote:You're entitled to your opinion Bat Pad. But tell me how did Meadows make the Finals from 8th spot (2005) and this year? That's twice in the last 4 Meadows have missed the Major Round, which would be dissapointing considering the talent and juniors at their disposal. But in saying that, I'd expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season.
by Cougar » Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:32 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Cougar wrote:You're entitled to your opinion Bat Pad. But tell me how did Meadows make the Finals from 8th spot (2005) and this year? That's twice in the last 4 Meadows have missed the Major Round, which would be dissapointing considering the talent and juniors at their disposal. But in saying that, I'd expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season.
They recruited very well. But once the catalyst for such a recruiting boom left, they fell away. The reason they fell away is due to those talented juniors didnt step up and play good footy in the A grade, and many who had potential are now playing B grade. I see a similar scenario perhaps for Kersbrook, due to their situation with the juniors. Only time will tell. Why do you expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season?
by Bat Pad » Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:02 pm
Cougar wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Cougar wrote:You're entitled to your opinion Bat Pad. But tell me how did Meadows make the Finals from 8th spot (2005) and this year? That's twice in the last 4 Meadows have missed the Major Round, which would be dissapointing considering the talent and juniors at their disposal. But in saying that, I'd expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season.
They recruited very well. But once the catalyst for such a recruiting boom left, they fell away. The reason they fell away is due to those talented juniors didnt step up and play good footy in the A grade, and many who had potential are now playing B grade. I see a similar scenario perhaps for Kersbrook, due to their situation with the juniors. Only time will tell. Why do you expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season?
Any side with 2 Dawes, Maidment, 2 Reids, Hunter (2 Russells) and with a strong junior program should be respected, and would imagine again to push for a Top 5 spot.
by the wonder elephant » Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:57 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Cougar wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Cougar wrote:You're entitled to your opinion Bat Pad. But tell me how did Meadows make the Finals from 8th spot (2005) and this year? That's twice in the last 4 Meadows have missed the Major Round, which would be dissapointing considering the talent and juniors at their disposal. But in saying that, I'd expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season.
They recruited very well. But once the catalyst for such a recruiting boom left, they fell away. The reason they fell away is due to those talented juniors didnt step up and play good footy in the A grade, and many who had potential are now playing B grade. I see a similar scenario perhaps for Kersbrook, due to their situation with the juniors. Only time will tell. Why do you expect Meadows to be thereabouts next season?
Any side with 2 Dawes, Maidment, 2 Reids, Hunter (2 Russells) and with a strong junior program should be respected, and would imagine again to push for a Top 5 spot.
I agree, but i think you'll find not all of those names will be there next year. interesting to see which way Meadows go. In my opinion they should take a year of a little bit of pain and blood the young talent they have while perhaps not paying anymore money to the older players who they have brought into the club. if they are willing to play for free, by all means let them hang around, but i cant see Meadows being a genuine contender next year, and therefore that will be money thrown at blokes on their last legs as opposed to giving young kids a genuine crack for free and might hang around long enough to make the side a force again. and save some cash in the meantime
by Bat Pad » Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:02 pm
by hillbilly » Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:49 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Have to ask those involved with the club mate, not me.
by Bat Pad » Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:42 am
by oldblueeyes » Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:31 pm
by Saint » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:29 am
by choppy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:44 pm
by The Gimp » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:38 pm
choppy wrote:nairnes junior colts over echunga by couple of goals..meadows senior colts over gums by 10 goals gums b's took the points over meadows in the b grade by a few goals..nairnes a's beat kangys by five goals in upset of the finals so far.
by MIRACLE MAN » Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:12 pm
by Cougar » Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |