New Rudd Stimulus Package

Anything!

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby mypaddock » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:48 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:HTF is ceiling insulation going to be a savior, surely the money would be more beneficial by building de-salination plants and getting pipelines from NT and Qld to pump water into the other states. It would create far more jobs and help the environment on a national scale.


Yeah i thought the whole insulation thing was a little strange. I think it'll be a long time before we see a govt take any action with the Australia's water issues. They'll probably wait until its too late before doing something about it.
mypaddock
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:51 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby AFLflyer » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:19 am

yeah I don't get that part either, iinsulation is more a climate change thing? saving emissions. I guess it will create jobs too.

even the primary school bit, 7500 upgrades. Although I think is great, how is that directly 'NOW' going to help the economy? (a part from creating jobs etc). I aint no economist so got no idea?
User avatar
AFLflyer
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:36 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Drop Bear » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:24 am

$950 worth of Tooheys New Cans coming up ;)
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby mypaddock » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:38 am

AFLflyer wrote:yeah I don't get that part either, iinsulation is more a climate change thing? saving emissions. I guess it will create jobs too.

even the primary school bit, 7500 upgrades. Although I think is great, how is that directly 'NOW' going to help the economy? (a part from creating jobs etc). I aint no economist so got no idea?


Schools' facilities isn't the problem, it's the curriculum that needs upgrading/revamping!
mypaddock
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:51 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby The Ash Man » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:38 am

Drop Bear wrote:$950 worth of Tooheys New Cans coming up ;)


Yeh Im gonna get half New cans and try and win more $$ for New cans on the slots!! ;)
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby smithy » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:56 am

A $950 once-off bonus to students and other income support recipients to assist with education costs.

Is this for people receiving austudy etc or any kid aged 5 + going to school ?
smithy
 

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Big Phil » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:59 am

I reckon I might use my $950 to fund a trip over to Perth for the SANFL v WAFL State Game...

The missus wants to put both ours towards the wedding in August but I need a holiday I tells ya !!!
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby am Bays » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:08 am

smithy wrote:A $950 once-off bonus to students and other income support recipients to assist with education costs.

Is this for people receiving austudy etc or any kid aged 5 + going to school ?


Abstudy, Austudy, youth allowance basically getting any money from the govt to educate yourself. So school kids nup unless they indicidually get money to go to school. So your average 5 -15 yo won't get it. Just spoke to an electoral officer who works for a govt member...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19813
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2136 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:13 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
smithy wrote:A $950 once-off bonus to students and other income support recipients to assist with education costs.

Is this for people receiving austudy etc or any kid aged 5 + going to school ?


Abstudy, Austudy, youth allowance basically getting any money from the govt to educate yourself. So school kids nup unless they indicidually get money to go to school. So your average 5 -15 yo won't get it. Just spoke to an electoral officer who works for a govt member...


Their parents should get it if they receive family tax benefit A.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53821
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4648 times
Been liked: 8604 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Dutchy » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:17 am

Gozu wrote:
Dutchy wrote:pretty ordinary comment Lunchcutter....more discrimination from Crud

why doesnt he put the $$$ into something that might be sustainable in the long term? cause it wont win him votes


Turn it up. $100K a year, you're sweet. Welfare is not for the rich although John Howard tried to make it acceptable. Take money off the poor to give to the rich, some ethics that. Won't win him votes? You think anyone will give a stuff about this payment come late 2010? Speaking of trying to buy votes, What was Howard's old trick...$300 payment to old age pensioners only on the eve of the election? Nah that's not trying to buy votes. :roll:


So this is welfare?

I fail to see the point of giving out handouts for people sitting on their bum, wont that just encourage them to keep doing waht they are doing?

LM has a great point, Australia gets enough rain, just in the wrong places....a pipeline would costs billions but would be the solution LONG TERM but it would also cost the government the next election as they would have to stop these handouts :roll: so it wont get done
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46313
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2659 times
Been liked: 4345 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby wycbloods » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:19 am

Dutchy wrote:
Gozu wrote:
Dutchy wrote:pretty ordinary comment Lunchcutter....more discrimination from Crud

why doesnt he put the $$$ into something that might be sustainable in the long term? cause it wont win him votes


Turn it up. $100K a year, you're sweet. Welfare is not for the rich although John Howard tried to make it acceptable. Take money off the poor to give to the rich, some ethics that. Won't win him votes? You think anyone will give a stuff about this payment come late 2010? Speaking of trying to buy votes, What was Howard's old trick...$300 payment to old age pensioners only on the eve of the election? Nah that's not trying to buy votes. :roll:


So this is welfare?

I fail to see the point of giving out handouts for people sitting on their bum, wont that just encourage them to keep doing waht they are doing?

LM has a great point, Australia gets enough rain, just in the wrong places....a pipeline would costs billions but would be the solution LONG TERM but it would also cost the government the next election as they would have to stop these handouts :roll: so it wont get done


Have i missed something or did i read that the unemployed will NOT be receiving any payment throught these 'handouts'.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:33 am

wycbloods wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Gozu wrote:
Turn it up. $100K a year, you're sweet. Welfare is not for the rich although John Howard tried to make it acceptable. Take money off the poor to give to the rich, some ethics that. Won't win him votes? You think anyone will give a stuff about this payment come late 2010? Speaking of trying to buy votes, What was Howard's old trick...$300 payment to old age pensioners only on the eve of the election? Nah that's not trying to buy votes. :roll:


So this is welfare?

I fail to see the point of giving out handouts for people sitting on their bum, wont that just encourage them to keep doing waht they are doing?

LM has a great point, Australia gets enough rain, just in the wrong places....a pipeline would costs billions but would be the solution LONG TERM but it would also cost the government the next election as they would have to stop these handouts :roll: so it wont get done


Have i missed something or did i read that the unemployed will NOT be receiving any payment throught these 'handouts'.


If they paid tax on their unemployment benefits or they could possibly fit into the category of "other income support", I'm no expert, I'm just trying to read between the lines of how it's written, I was pretty accurate with the last one.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53821
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4648 times
Been liked: 8604 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby mick » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:40 am

Gozu wrote:
Dutchy wrote:pretty ordinary comment Lunchcutter....more discrimination from Crud

why doesnt he put the $$$ into something that might be sustainable in the long term? cause it wont win him votes


Turn it up. $100K a year, you're sweet. Welfare is not for the rich although John Howard tried to make it acceptable. Take money off the poor to give to the rich, some ethics that. Won't win him votes? You think anyone will give a stuff about this payment come late 2010? Speaking of trying to buy votes, What was Howard's old trick...$300 payment to old age pensioners only on the eve of the election? Nah that's not trying to buy votes. :roll:

A family with an income of $100K and a mortgage is not "rich". In my own situation I won't be getting anything, I've never had a free kick from the government in my whole working life or ever used social security, I'm rather proud of that and thank-you Mr Rudd for preserving my unblemished record :lol:
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Q. » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:47 am

wycbloods wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Gozu wrote:
Dutchy wrote:pretty ordinary comment Lunchcutter....more discrimination from Crud

why doesnt he put the $$$ into something that might be sustainable in the long term? cause it wont win him votes


Turn it up. $100K a year, you're sweet. Welfare is not for the rich although John Howard tried to make it acceptable. Take money off the poor to give to the rich, some ethics that. Won't win him votes? You think anyone will give a stuff about this payment come late 2010? Speaking of trying to buy votes, What was Howard's old trick...$300 payment to old age pensioners only on the eve of the election? Nah that's not trying to buy votes. :roll:


So this is welfare?

I fail to see the point of giving out handouts for people sitting on their bum, wont that just encourage them to keep doing waht they are doing?

LM has a great point, Australia gets enough rain, just in the wrong places....a pipeline would costs billions but would be the solution LONG TERM but it would also cost the government the next election as they would have to stop these handouts :roll: so it wont get done


Have i missed something or did i read that the unemployed will NOT be receiving any payment throught these 'handouts'.


I think there has been a separate proposal to increase welfare payments.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Dutchy » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:50 am

dont have to be unemployed to be a bum
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46313
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2659 times
Been liked: 4345 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby FlyingHigh » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:58 am

Desalination plants :roll:
Pumping water from North to South :roll:
Wasting the water we already get by letting it run out to sea :roll:

I am a part-time student, full-time employee, am i eligible for a student payment?
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4911
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Dutchy » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:18 am

FlyingHigh wrote:Desalination plants :roll:
Pumping water from North to South :roll:
Wasting the water we already get by letting it run out to sea :roll:

I am a part-time student, full-time employee, am i eligible for a student payment?


agree with points 1 & 3 but not sure why you dont like the pipeline idea? too much water up North, not enough in the South...seems sensible to me
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46313
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2659 times
Been liked: 4345 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:22 am

FlyingHigh wrote:Desalination plants :roll:
Pumping water from North to South :roll:
Wasting the water we already get by letting it run out to sea :roll:

I am a part-time student, full-time employee, am i eligible for a student payment?


Go have a look at the Riverland, obviously you're not studying economics or agriculture. The farmers in the Riverland are on sh!t street atm, crops are running at 10% or less for a lot of them. You're educated, why don't you suss out if you're eligible or not. :roll:
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53821
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4648 times
Been liked: 8604 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:25 am

Dutchy wrote:
FlyingHigh wrote:Desalination plants :roll:
Pumping water from North to South :roll:
Wasting the water we already get by letting it run out to sea :roll:

I am a part-time student, full-time employee, am i eligible for a student payment?


agree with points 1 & 3 but not sure why you dont like the pipeline idea? too much water up North, not enough in the South...seems sensible to me


Points 1 & 3 would not be necessary if point 2 was employed. I should've worded it better initially, there should have been an "or" in there somewhere.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53821
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4648 times
Been liked: 8604 times

Re: New Rudd Stimulus Package

Postby Dirko » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:29 am

Pumping water from North - South, would be a great idea, considering Darwin have a Dam they could start using again. They should've done it at the same time as they put the train line in.......
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |