by Punk Rooster » Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:08 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by heater31 » Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:41 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:
And here's the kicker...
A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland.
by CENTURION » Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:02 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:12 pm
CENTURION wrote:I was born the day that jfk was assassinated, 22/11/1963, my cousin was born the day that his brother was assassinated in June 1969?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by johntheclaret » Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:52 am
Punk Rooster wrote:CENTURION wrote:I was born the day that jfk was assassinated, 22/11/1963, my cousin was born the day that his brother was assassinated in June 1969?
I take it neither of you were in Monroe?
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:50 am
Punk Rooster wrote:John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.
by Psyber » Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:03 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:11 am
CENTURION wrote:I was born the day that jfk was assassinated, 22/11/1963, my cousin was born the day that his brother was assassinated in June 1969?
by ORDoubleBlues » Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:44 am
therisingblues wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln , was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.
I don't think Oswald shot Kennedy.
That's based entirely on what I learned watching "JFK" the movie.
by Psyber » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:46 am
Obviously, it was Monroe's other boyfriends acting together to mutual benefit...ORDoubleBlues wrote:.. That's probably right and if you look at all the facts, how was it possible that one bullet caused 7 wounds and how did the fatal Kennedy headshot hit him from a 90 degree front on angle when the Texas Book Depository was on a 90 degree angle behind him.
Whatever you argue, there's no way that Oswald did it by himself
by Hondo » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:08 am
ORDoubleBlues wrote:therisingblues wrote:I don't think Oswald shot Kennedy.
That's based entirely on what I learned watching "JFK" the movie.
That's probably right and if you look at all the facts, how was it possible that one bullet caused 7 wounds and how did the fatal Kennedy headshot hit him from a 90 degree front on angle when the Texas Book Depository was on a 90 degree angle behind him.
Whatever you argue, there's no way that Oswald did it by himself
by Pidge » Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:27 am
by ORDoubleBlues » Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:25 am
Psyber wrote:Obviously, it was Monroe's other boyfriends acting together to mutual benefit...ORDoubleBlues wrote:.. That's probably right and if you look at all the facts, how was it possible that one bullet caused 7 wounds and how did the fatal Kennedy headshot hit him from a 90 degree front on angle when the Texas Book Depository was on a 90 degree angle behind him.
Whatever you argue, there's no way that Oswald did it by himself
by ORDoubleBlues » Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:33 am
hondo71 wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:therisingblues wrote:I don't think Oswald shot Kennedy.
That's based entirely on what I learned watching "JFK" the movie.
That's probably right and if you look at all the facts, how was it possible that one bullet caused 7 wounds and how did the fatal Kennedy headshot hit him from a 90 degree front on angle when the Texas Book Depository was on a 90 degree angle behind him.
Whatever you argue, there's no way that Oswald did it by himself
I agree Oswald has to be a patsy. The magic bullet theory is ridiculous.
However, be aware that "JFK" the movie is, to a large extent, imaginative fantasy. He's taken facts from here an there and added a lot of fiction. However, by including realistic recreations it makes it seem like a documentary, which it's far from. Oliver Stone has admitted his movie is far from factual.
All the stuff about Cuba and the CIA for example. He's just guessing like the rest of us.
Back on the real assassination, IIRC the idea is that once all the people involved are dead, the real facts will come out.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |