by bandar » Fri May 01, 2009 9:07 am
by The Bartman » Fri May 01, 2009 3:49 pm
bandar wrote:I saw the agenda for the meeting last night and there is an item relating to a vote to remove a person from the executive. I also looked at the relevant part of the constitution with the reasons that this can be done. One of them is being dead so I am fairly certain it's not that one.
by bandar » Fri May 01, 2009 3:51 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:I heard something similar ace, David Green will be accompanied by his lawyer Greg Griffen to Amateur House next week.![]()
Look out someone down there.
by oldslow » Fri May 01, 2009 6:00 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Before anyone wants to start throwing around bullshit or bagging the league, I'm putting everyone on their first warning right now.
This matter will be discussed in a civil manner and SAFooty Admin and moderators WILL NOT TOLERATE any slagging off of any member of the SAAFL executive committee or any rumour-milling relating to this subject.
Facts, as they come to hand are more than welcome to be discussed.
Anyone NOT complying with the above will have their post removed and receive an automatic ban as SAFooty will not be held responsible for any comment deemed slanderous or libelious.
Thanks in advance for your co-operation.
by Footy Chick » Mon May 04, 2009 11:58 am
by turk186 » Mon May 04, 2009 6:56 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon May 04, 2009 7:11 pm
by turk186 » Mon May 04, 2009 7:14 pm
by Pag » Mon May 04, 2009 7:19 pm
by turk186 » Mon May 04, 2009 7:25 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon May 04, 2009 7:28 pm
by heater31 » Mon May 04, 2009 7:30 pm
Footy Chick wrote:The letter from Greeny simply gave his side of the story and went into allegations of the league (or more speficially Shads and Gino) of mis-appropiating SAAFL funds.
by Pag » Mon May 04, 2009 7:32 pm
The Sunday Mail said the reason was that there was a disagreement regarding a disbaility ramp at Thebarton and a subsuquent phone conversation was deemed unacceptable.turk186 wrote:FC ..what else was in the letter?
Pag...not one of those articles mentioned much on the reason for the sit down..and the reason is what is not to be discussed..I think..maybe some info in the letter FC has spied??...perhaps
by Punk Rooster » Mon May 04, 2009 7:34 pm
heater31 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The letter from Greeny simply gave his side of the story and went into allegations of the league (or more speficially Shads and Gino) of mis-appropiating SAAFL funds.
![]()
like a trip to Ireland
![]()
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by heater31 » Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
Pag wrote:The Sunday Mail said the reason was that there was a disagreement regarding a disbaility ramp at Thebarton and a subsuquent phone conversation was deemed unacceptable.turk186 wrote:FC ..what else was in the letter?
Pag...not one of those articles mentioned much on the reason for the sit down..and the reason is what is not to be discussed..I think..maybe some info in the letter FC has spied??...perhaps
I don't personally believe that's all it is though, as I have heard one side of the argument from someone within SAAFL HQ. Ugly situation I think.
by turk186 » Mon May 04, 2009 7:37 pm
by NO-MERCY » Mon May 04, 2009 7:54 pm
by turk186 » Mon May 04, 2009 8:11 pm
by NO-MERCY » Mon May 04, 2009 8:28 pm
turk186 wrote:NM I have had a "bit to do" with the gentle folk at HQ and have got into the habit of counting my fingers after shaking hands with most
by Jimmy_041 » Mon May 04, 2009 9:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |