by bulldogproud » Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:55 pm
by sus » Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:58 pm
bulldogproud wrote:It sure helped in the win against Norwood at Coopers. How many points clear of sixth did the Eagles finish? I thought it was only three.
by Mickyj » Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:12 pm
bulldogproud wrote:It sure helped in the win against Norwood at Coopers. How many points clear of sixth did the Eagles finish? I thought it was only three.
by ca » Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:36 pm
by mal » Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:40 pm
by Mickyj » Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:39 pm
mal wrote:If Welsh played for Norwood that night instead of the Eagles![]()
![]()
![]()
Whatever way I look at it the SANFL has been embarrassed.
by eaglehaslanded » Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:53 pm
bulldogproud wrote:It is a little ironic that the Eagles reserves only made the finals because they had various Crows players play for them virtue of the Eagles being bottom at the time. I very much remember Welsh's nine goals at Norwood Oval for instance.
by bulldogproud » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:36 am
by Punk Rooster » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:23 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Aerie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:34 am
Punk Rooster wrote:The current rules are a mess.
My thoughts...
Crows/Power listed players play 7 regular games with their SANFL club (inc. byes).
This makes them eligible to play finals in the SANFL-
if the Crows & Power are still in the finals
if the Crows & Power are out of the finals
If the Crows & Power are in the finals, & they haven't played 7 regular season games (including byes), then they cannot play in the SANFL finals.
Simple & end of story imo.
by Ecky » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:43 am
by spell_check » Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:16 pm
by Aerie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:18 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:07 pm
Ecky wrote:Sounds good Punky.
The loophole that lets David Westbrook play Reserves this week should also be plugged.
by eaglehaslanded » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:11 pm
Aerie wrote: I hope Travis Oakley gets a full pre-season under his belt and really makes an effort for 2007 because he has the size and plenty of ability. He is well above reserves level.
by Ecky » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:15 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:Ecky wrote:Sounds good Punky.
The loophole that lets David Westbrook play Reserves this week should also be plugged.
westbrook was returning from injury. needed a run and deserves to do so. case closed.
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:30 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:Aerie wrote: I hope Travis Oakley gets a full pre-season under his belt and really makes an effort for 2007 because he has the size and plenty of ability. He is well above reserves level.
he's in good enough form to be playing 1's now and in most other clubs would definately be a walk up start.
by Mickyj » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:34 pm
Wedgie wrote:eaglehaslanded wrote:Aerie wrote: I hope Travis Oakley gets a full pre-season under his belt and really makes an effort for 2007 because he has the size and plenty of ability. He is well above reserves level.
he's in good enough form to be playing 1's now and in most other clubs would definately be a walk up start.
That's what he thought when he was at North only to get the same result at a club with bugerall forwards a year later.
Oakley like many other players (Walton comes to mind from North) will always be the sort of guy that can play well in ressies but isn't good enough to step up to league.
He hasn't got the size or marking strength for a key position in the league and he hasn't got the mobility to be a flanker or a pocket.
He'll be forever in "twilight zone" unless he goes to Norwood where he would get a walk up start.
But so would I!
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:36 pm
Mickyj wrote:I hate to admit this but after watching him this year I would agree with WEDGIE
it is a pity he can not play on a flank
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |