
Has been OK for the 'Ants.
by Dirko » Tue May 26, 2009 9:36 am
by nuggety goodness » Tue May 26, 2009 4:31 pm
by Voice » Tue May 26, 2009 7:48 pm
by Swervyn » Fri May 29, 2009 10:59 am
by Dirko » Fri May 29, 2009 11:03 am
Swervyn wrote:Does anyone know WTF has happened to Heath Scotland, not in the side, not suspended (I think) & not on the injury list...
by Voice » Sat May 30, 2009 12:09 pm
by Voice » Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:00 am
by unknown source » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:59 pm
by JK » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:38 pm
unknown source wrote:how bad were the umps with fev against the saints last night?? i know last week they looked after him but last night was a joke.. good game to watch, poor juddy with the nose was starting to look dangerous..
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:30 pm
by Voice » Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:17 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:I keep telling the Carlton supporters at work that the Blues have no defense. No defense= no finals!!!
by gadj1976 » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:36 am
Voice wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:I keep telling the Carlton supporters at work that the Blues have no defense. No defense= no finals!!!
Why is our defence rated 4th in the league before this game if we don't have one? If you're talking about injuries to our defenders then i'm with you but the young players down there stood up well in this game and have been good all year. Austin was really good and Bower did well but some of the delivery to Saint Nick was unstoppable. Joseph was also very good on Milne and is getting used to tagging AND hurting opposition on the way back.
Just wondering, how many Carlton games you watched this year to be an expert on our defence?
by Voice » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:27 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Voice wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:I keep telling the Carlton supporters at work that the Blues have no defense. No defense= no finals!!!
Why is our defence rated 4th in the league before this game if we don't have one? If you're talking about injuries to our defenders then i'm with you but the young players down there stood up well in this game and have been good all year. Austin was really good and Bower did well but some of the delivery to Saint Nick was unstoppable. Joseph was also very good on Milne and is getting used to tagging AND hurting opposition on the way back.
Just wondering, how many Carlton games you watched this year to be an expert on our defence?
Voice, I keep saying to mates of mine that we wont go top till we get a strong key position backman, and that yes, our defence is our weakness. We struggle against big strong marking forwards. What we're doing now is using what I call third stringers (third talls) in key positions because we don't have that big strong body in defence that other teams do. I don't think we have "no defence" but I think we're susceptible to key forwards taking us apart. Essendon, Saints, Brissy for instance. Teams without a big power forward we seem to go better against, like the Bulldogs for instance.
So I think it's reasonable to say that our defence is our weakness, as well as maybe CHF and a third tall in attack.
by gadj1976 » Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:08 pm
Voice wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Voice wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:I keep telling the Carlton supporters at work that the Blues have no defense. No defense= no finals!!!
Why is our defence rated 4th in the league before this game if we don't have one? If you're talking about injuries to our defenders then i'm with you but the young players down there stood up well in this game and have been good all year. Austin was really good and Bower did well but some of the delivery to Saint Nick was unstoppable. Joseph was also very good on Milne and is getting used to tagging AND hurting opposition on the way back.
Just wondering, how many Carlton games you watched this year to be an expert on our defence?
Voice, I keep saying to mates of mine that we wont go top till we get a strong key position backman, and that yes, our defence is our weakness. We struggle against big strong marking forwards. What we're doing now is using what I call third stringers (third talls) in key positions because we don't have that big strong body in defence that other teams do. I don't think we have "no defence" but I think we're susceptible to key forwards taking us apart. Essendon, Saints, Brissy for instance. Teams without a big power forward we seem to go better against, like the Bulldogs for instance.
So I think it's reasonable to say that our defence is our weakness, as well as maybe CHF and a third tall in attack.
Yeah, I agree but they are doing well considering and what I was really jumping on the sleeping midget for was his no defence, no finals comment. We will make finals with the backline we have even when we're missing Waite. If the midget was to say, 'they won't win a premiership with that defence' then I would agree.
Looking through his posts, he does nothing but troll anyway.
by The Jack » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:48 pm
by gadj1976 » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:49 pm
The Jack wrote:So what deficiencies did you see tonight??!!!Or is there not enough cyberspace???
by The Jack » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:53 pm
by gadj1976 » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:01 pm
The Jack wrote:Ha! Fair enough. I wasn't meaning you personally gadj, just the Carlton supporters as a whole!Sigh, if only we could play you guys every week! We'd be awesome!
by Dutchy » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:37 am
by Q. » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:40 am
Dutchy wrote:Serious questions at Carlton, Ratten getting out coached again....Murphy is very disappointing....and Fev, fair dinkum
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |