by mavrick » Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:29 pm
by barbs » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:44 pm
by FOOTY TALK » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:47 pm
barbs wrote:Here is the squad.
What number of players would everyone consider fair for a side without the bye (DIV 2 and down) to contribute to the side?
1 Capogreco, Daniel
11-V/C Grocke, Nathan
20-C Hay, Joseph
4 Clay, Steven
9 Brunoli, Matthew
10 Papageorgiou, Christopher
12 Kerr, Michael
16 Rowe, Matthew
19 Brewer, Nicholas
28 Robson, Judd
29 Jolly, Nick
31 Kelly, Ryan
32 Dempsey, Anthony
33 Eleftheriou, Mitchell
36 Wilson, Martin
38 Rotolo, Mathew
39 Pollock, Steven
40 Moon, Brendon
42 Frost, Nicholas
45 Motley, Christopher
73 Clark, Jason
74 Spurway-humphries, Dale
by wristwatcher » Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:28 am
by S Demon » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:53 pm
wristwatcher wrote:BIG NEWS
the entire u/23 game v Tassie will be shown on tv next week on thursday instead of Grassroots.Will be good to watch.
by Footy Chick » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:35 am
by oldslow » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:18 pm
FOOTY TALK wrote:barbs wrote:Here is the squad.
What number of players would everyone consider fair for a side without the bye (DIV 2 and down) to contribute to the side?
1 Capogreco, Daniel
11-V/C Grocke, Nathan
20-C Hay, Joseph
4 Clay, Steven
9 Brunoli, Matthew
10 Papageorgiou, Christopher
12 Kerr, Michael
16 Rowe, Matthew
19 Brewer, Nicholas
28 Robson, Judd
29 Jolly, Nick
31 Kelly, Ryan
32 Dempsey, Anthony
33 Eleftheriou, Mitchell
36 Wilson, Martin
38 Rotolo, Mathew
39 Pollock, Steven
40 Moon, Brendon
42 Frost, Nicholas
45 Motley, Christopher
73 Clark, Jason
74 Spurway-humphries, Dale
wouldnt be a state team without a capogreco?
by Shirtfront » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:15 pm
by macca 21 » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:18 am
Shirtfront wrote:Watched the game last night intead of Grass Roots, not overly impressed with the standard.
I know i wasn't there and the footage was a little patchy but i thought the skill level and overall game was pretty ordinary. Not a great example of state footy imo.
Tasmania look a shambles and if its true that they only flew over the morning of the game and only trained a couple times together before that, doesn't that tell you that this Under 23 format is a joke. Obviously they are not taking it serious, why should we care???
by BobbyNeil » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:10 pm
by wristwatcher » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:11 am
BobbyNeil wrote:U23 football is a joke! That side wouldn't even beat a top div 2 team let alone a div 1 team. How is that a good representation of what the SAAFL has to offer?
by Mr Butterworth » Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:39 pm
by mavrick » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:13 pm
by macca 21 » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:46 am
BobbyNeil wrote:U23 football is a joke! That side wouldn't even beat a top div 2 team let alone a div 1 team. How is that a good representation of what the SAAFL has to offer?
by bird of prey » Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:20 am
macca 21 wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:U23 football is a joke! That side wouldn't even beat a top div 2 team let alone a div 1 team. How is that a good representation of what the SAAFL has to offer?
C'mon. The U23 side would beat any current Amatuer team. It was a good team, just would not get close to an open age team.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |